The fair use screenshots don't look like they have a purpose here. They shouldn't be here unless they exemplify something further than the text could, and there isn't even any text describing the music videos.
The references aren't formatted consistently. They should all have access dates and the publishers should be wikilinked.
There aren't any sources for the chart positions. There needs to be a reliable source for each. See
Wikipedia:Record charts for a list of good archive sites.
This article is definitely lacking in sources. I see three whole paragraphs that are completely unsourced. Every claim of fact must cite a
reliable source. The article is also a bit quote-heavy. This shows in the references. About a third of them are to song lyrics.
I suggest merging the "tracks" and "singles" sections. There's no need to have a separate section just to describe the singles. Also, the track-by-track descriptions need to be shortened and summarized. The section is too long as is. The article setup seems a bit odd to me as well. Take a look at
Wikipedia:Album#Article body for an idea of what the main points of the article should be.
It's going to take a lot of work on your part, as these are major issues, but I'll give you a chance to bring this up to GA quality. I'm going to put the article on hold for now so you have a chance to work on it and fix the issues. I'll give you a few days to get the issues dealt with.
Timmeh(
review me)02:39, 25 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Sorry, but I'm going to have to fail this. It's been 26 days since I put the review on hold, and the normal allowance is only a week. Feel free to resubmit it to
WP:GAN when you've addressed my concerns.
Timmeh23:59, 20 October 2009 (UTC)reply
The fair use screenshots don't look like they have a purpose here. They shouldn't be here unless they exemplify something further than the text could, and there isn't even any text describing the music videos.
The references aren't formatted consistently. They should all have access dates and the publishers should be wikilinked.
There aren't any sources for the chart positions. There needs to be a reliable source for each. See
Wikipedia:Record charts for a list of good archive sites.
This article is definitely lacking in sources. I see three whole paragraphs that are completely unsourced. Every claim of fact must cite a
reliable source. The article is also a bit quote-heavy. This shows in the references. About a third of them are to song lyrics.
I suggest merging the "tracks" and "singles" sections. There's no need to have a separate section just to describe the singles. Also, the track-by-track descriptions need to be shortened and summarized. The section is too long as is. The article setup seems a bit odd to me as well. Take a look at
Wikipedia:Album#Article body for an idea of what the main points of the article should be.
It's going to take a lot of work on your part, as these are major issues, but I'll give you a chance to bring this up to GA quality. I'm going to put the article on hold for now so you have a chance to work on it and fix the issues. I'll give you a few days to get the issues dealt with.
Timmeh(
review me)02:39, 25 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Sorry, but I'm going to have to fail this. It's been 26 days since I put the review on hold, and the normal allowance is only a week. Feel free to resubmit it to
WP:GAN when you've addressed my concerns.
Timmeh23:59, 20 October 2009 (UTC)reply