Love, Blactually has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Pinnochio scene is an airplane! parody, that should be in the cr section —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.117.241.124 ( talk) 14:54, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Not to criticize, but I think the term "making love" should be changed in this article to "having sex". i mean, was there really any love going on here, on Carolyn's end, anyway? She did it with Cleveland in public, and then with Quagmire. Enough said. What do you think? 99.142.27.233 ( talk) 14:38, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
I think what you are saying is right, but for all the wrong reasons. "Making love" is not an encyclopaedic term, "having sex" is a scientifically correct, encyclopaedic term. Whilst I agree it should be changed I think you're looking a bit too deeply into this, it should be changed regardless of the context of the sexual intercourse. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
78.146.71.78 (
talk) 18:04, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
I changed it, hope that's okay. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.138.106.82 ( talk) 14:27, 1 October 2008 (UTC) lol i always have diffrent tabs open to read while a page loads and i swear to god i just edited a talk page to ask if "seduced" was the right word for what meg did to brian in "barely legal" and i click the other tab to read this lol i agree btw 174.42.145.253 ( talk) 06:28, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
I removed the 'citation needed' from the sentence "The title is a pun on the movie Love Actually." but it was reverted because "we cant assume to know the intentions of the writers" (according to user Dp76764). Sorry but is that not ridiculous? Of course we can 'assume' that the writers intended the title as a pun on Love Actually... there's no such word as Blactually and it doesn't sound like any other phrase. Also, Love Actually isn't a phrase in common use... try googling it and you'll just get 60 million hits about the movie! What citation are you likely to find? Another website commenting that the title is similar to Love Actually? A writer spelling it out in a quote? I don't see what qualifies the sentence as a disputable fact when there is literally no other explanation for the title of the episode. Retro junkie ( talk) 20:06, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Fox uses a comma for the episode name ("Love, Blactually"), so the article needs to be moved to the correct name. [1] 96.25.248.210 ( talk) 16:36, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: MayhemMario ( talk · contribs) 16:18, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
Im reviewing this article and will begin my review soon. Mayhem Mario 16:18, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
Having a look at the overall article- I can see it has many problems- just using the tools to my right.
Sources Im not going to go into a full review untill (if you can) these problems have been fixed- at the moment the articles not looking good.
1. The title isnt what you say- it is just 'Family Guy-Love Blactually'.
2. No mention of what your quoting in this source. (i.e. USELESS.) Also- is 'comingsoonnet' a reliable source?
3. The title is 'Family Guy, Vol. 7 (2009)'
4. Again, 'Family Guy - Season 8 (3 Disc Set)' Okay also, Source 3 can source this quote. I think as Amazon is a much more reliable source just use this to quote both. (i.e. Delete this source and source the information with Source 3)
5. OH DEAR. This soruce is excatly the same as source 1. (i.e. Delete this soruce/ merge with soruce 1)
6. This source is dead, which means either a) delete all the information this soruce quoted b) find an alternative source c) puts 'cituation needed' tags- (look messy though).
9. I don't honsestly think your using this source to its full potential. Im not sure if it is relaible- but I think there is much more quotes you can get from that source.
10. See Source 9.
- On hold for 7 days untill further action is taken by the reviewer. Mayhem Mario 18:07, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: M.Mario ( talk · contribs) 15:35, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Reviewing per request at my talk page.
- Tell me on my talk page when you have finished/if you have any questions. — M.Mario ( T/ C) 15:35, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Love, Blactually. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:25, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Love, Blactually has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Pinnochio scene is an airplane! parody, that should be in the cr section —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.117.241.124 ( talk) 14:54, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Not to criticize, but I think the term "making love" should be changed in this article to "having sex". i mean, was there really any love going on here, on Carolyn's end, anyway? She did it with Cleveland in public, and then with Quagmire. Enough said. What do you think? 99.142.27.233 ( talk) 14:38, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
I think what you are saying is right, but for all the wrong reasons. "Making love" is not an encyclopaedic term, "having sex" is a scientifically correct, encyclopaedic term. Whilst I agree it should be changed I think you're looking a bit too deeply into this, it should be changed regardless of the context of the sexual intercourse. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
78.146.71.78 (
talk) 18:04, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
I changed it, hope that's okay. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.138.106.82 ( talk) 14:27, 1 October 2008 (UTC) lol i always have diffrent tabs open to read while a page loads and i swear to god i just edited a talk page to ask if "seduced" was the right word for what meg did to brian in "barely legal" and i click the other tab to read this lol i agree btw 174.42.145.253 ( talk) 06:28, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
I removed the 'citation needed' from the sentence "The title is a pun on the movie Love Actually." but it was reverted because "we cant assume to know the intentions of the writers" (according to user Dp76764). Sorry but is that not ridiculous? Of course we can 'assume' that the writers intended the title as a pun on Love Actually... there's no such word as Blactually and it doesn't sound like any other phrase. Also, Love Actually isn't a phrase in common use... try googling it and you'll just get 60 million hits about the movie! What citation are you likely to find? Another website commenting that the title is similar to Love Actually? A writer spelling it out in a quote? I don't see what qualifies the sentence as a disputable fact when there is literally no other explanation for the title of the episode. Retro junkie ( talk) 20:06, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Fox uses a comma for the episode name ("Love, Blactually"), so the article needs to be moved to the correct name. [1] 96.25.248.210 ( talk) 16:36, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: MayhemMario ( talk · contribs) 16:18, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
Im reviewing this article and will begin my review soon. Mayhem Mario 16:18, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
Having a look at the overall article- I can see it has many problems- just using the tools to my right.
Sources Im not going to go into a full review untill (if you can) these problems have been fixed- at the moment the articles not looking good.
1. The title isnt what you say- it is just 'Family Guy-Love Blactually'.
2. No mention of what your quoting in this source. (i.e. USELESS.) Also- is 'comingsoonnet' a reliable source?
3. The title is 'Family Guy, Vol. 7 (2009)'
4. Again, 'Family Guy - Season 8 (3 Disc Set)' Okay also, Source 3 can source this quote. I think as Amazon is a much more reliable source just use this to quote both. (i.e. Delete this source and source the information with Source 3)
5. OH DEAR. This soruce is excatly the same as source 1. (i.e. Delete this soruce/ merge with soruce 1)
6. This source is dead, which means either a) delete all the information this soruce quoted b) find an alternative source c) puts 'cituation needed' tags- (look messy though).
9. I don't honsestly think your using this source to its full potential. Im not sure if it is relaible- but I think there is much more quotes you can get from that source.
10. See Source 9.
- On hold for 7 days untill further action is taken by the reviewer. Mayhem Mario 18:07, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: M.Mario ( talk · contribs) 15:35, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Reviewing per request at my talk page.
- Tell me on my talk page when you have finished/if you have any questions. — M.Mario ( T/ C) 15:35, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Love, Blactually. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:25, 26 May 2017 (UTC)