This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Louisiana Intelligence Digest article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Louisiana Intelligence Digest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:05, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
I tried to scrounge up some substantial or even trivial coverage in reliable sources for this article, but I think I've struck out. Although there are a lot of conspiracy sources that mention the newsletter, all of them seem to be regurgitating one or two sentences that appear to have origins in one of the following three:
There are currently four sources for this article, all push JFK conspiracy theories, and all offer only simple blurbs that have their origins in one of the three sources above:
Interestingly, despite all the manpower the House Select Committee on Assassinations put into investigating Jim Garrison's claims of Oswald, Banister, Ferrie, etc., there is not one blurb about the Louisiana Intelligence Digest in its thousands upon thousands of documents, memos, and reports. Should this article stay, go, or be merged... and with what reliable sourcing? - Location ( talk) 05:13, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Louisiana Intelligence Digest article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Louisiana Intelligence Digest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:05, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
I tried to scrounge up some substantial or even trivial coverage in reliable sources for this article, but I think I've struck out. Although there are a lot of conspiracy sources that mention the newsletter, all of them seem to be regurgitating one or two sentences that appear to have origins in one of the following three:
There are currently four sources for this article, all push JFK conspiracy theories, and all offer only simple blurbs that have their origins in one of the three sources above:
Interestingly, despite all the manpower the House Select Committee on Assassinations put into investigating Jim Garrison's claims of Oswald, Banister, Ferrie, etc., there is not one blurb about the Louisiana Intelligence Digest in its thousands upon thousands of documents, memos, and reports. Should this article stay, go, or be merged... and with what reliable sourcing? - Location ( talk) 05:13, 16 September 2022 (UTC)