GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Larry Hockett ( talk · contribs) 12:57, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
I will be happy to review this. Thanks to the nominator for his interest in improving Wikipedia's coverage of science and medicine. Larry Hockett ( Talk) 12:57, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
As I read this entry, I am concerned about copyright problems, specifically close paraphrasing, or the use of wording from another source with only superficial modification. Here are a few examples:
These were just examples that I noted from the early portions of the article. The rest of the entry needs to be reviewed for this issue.
There are also some tone/neutrality issues. In the lead, there is a mention of Boursier raising the status of the profession from folklore to science, but there seems to be little support for this idea even in the body of the entry. WP:Peer review may be helpful to stamp out such issues.
A GOCE request may also be helpful for this article; there are some odd constructions, such as "which however did not bring in enough money..." and "just outside Paris called, the".
I am sure that we can work on the writing issues, but copyright problems fall under the quick fail criteria at WP:GAFAIL and should be addressed before re-nomination.
Thank you for your work on this entry. Larry Hockett ( Talk) 13:44, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Larry Hockett ( talk · contribs) 12:57, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
I will be happy to review this. Thanks to the nominator for his interest in improving Wikipedia's coverage of science and medicine. Larry Hockett ( Talk) 12:57, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
As I read this entry, I am concerned about copyright problems, specifically close paraphrasing, or the use of wording from another source with only superficial modification. Here are a few examples:
These were just examples that I noted from the early portions of the article. The rest of the entry needs to be reviewed for this issue.
There are also some tone/neutrality issues. In the lead, there is a mention of Boursier raising the status of the profession from folklore to science, but there seems to be little support for this idea even in the body of the entry. WP:Peer review may be helpful to stamp out such issues.
A GOCE request may also be helpful for this article; there are some odd constructions, such as "which however did not bring in enough money..." and "just outside Paris called, the".
I am sure that we can work on the writing issues, but copyright problems fall under the quick fail criteria at WP:GAFAIL and should be addressed before re-nomination.
Thank you for your work on this entry. Larry Hockett ( Talk) 13:44, 10 August 2020 (UTC)