![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 22 May 2020. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 13:36, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Please fix the references up a bit (like adding Retrieved date, on my edit it was September 1) as I don't know how to do that. Also, criticism of MacBook is not a "campaign", so go figure what to do with that. Emperoringo ( talk) 08:14, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
I wasn't aware of youtube videos being reliable sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.36.67.212 ( talk) 20:34, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Shouldn't it focus on his most viewed video, like "The horrible truth about Apple's repeated engineering failures" and "Genius Bar caught ripping customer off ON CAMERA", etc? I am a longtime viewer of his channel and did not know about the videos mentioned. BalaM314 ( π) ( talk) 16:39, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
There are multiple instances of OR in this article, most notable is his recent move from NY to TX. While certainly an interesting fact, it's inclusion should not be solely based on his own personal announcement or YT videos. (see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tca6xsBEuGw) referenced in the lead. Kcmastrpc ( talk) 16:16, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
My edit was reverted, apparently because of WP:UNDUE: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=&diff=prev&oldid=1188999710. Forgive me if I misunderstand, but since there is no published alternative viewpoint, WP:UNDUE does not apply:
Neutrality requires that mainspace articles and pages fairly represent all significant viewpoints that have been published by reliable sources, in proportion to the prominence of each viewpoint in those sources.
To me, this implies that if there is only one viewpoint published by a reliable source, then it is:
If the argument was that my sources don't meet the criteria defined in WP:BLPSELFPUB for a reliable self-published source, then we could debate that, since they are borderline. But my edit does not, I believe, violate WP:UNDUE. Pandapip1 ( talk) 18:01, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
What's he done other than being a loudmouth about "right to repaair" Wikipedia:Notability applies here, and I fail to see how "random Youtuber" = notable. Also WP:SOAPBOX This is is not a soapbox for grandstanding about "right to repair." If there are noteworthy issues about right to repair then put them on Apple's page 27.96.192.138 ( talk) 05:16, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Should the censorship of the app name "Grayjay" be included? Annon-of-good-will ( talk) 12:29, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Rossman has been making videos where he argues for “ the moral, right” to pirate Contant, but then all the sudden will say “ don’t watch the content because it’s not worth it” which comes across more of a political reason than moral reason. I wonder if Rossman has ties to conservative or Randian idealogy groups. B ThatNerdyGuy ( talk) 07:56, 15 May 2024 (UTC) |
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 22 May 2020. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 13:36, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Please fix the references up a bit (like adding Retrieved date, on my edit it was September 1) as I don't know how to do that. Also, criticism of MacBook is not a "campaign", so go figure what to do with that. Emperoringo ( talk) 08:14, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
I wasn't aware of youtube videos being reliable sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.36.67.212 ( talk) 20:34, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Shouldn't it focus on his most viewed video, like "The horrible truth about Apple's repeated engineering failures" and "Genius Bar caught ripping customer off ON CAMERA", etc? I am a longtime viewer of his channel and did not know about the videos mentioned. BalaM314 ( π) ( talk) 16:39, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
There are multiple instances of OR in this article, most notable is his recent move from NY to TX. While certainly an interesting fact, it's inclusion should not be solely based on his own personal announcement or YT videos. (see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tca6xsBEuGw) referenced in the lead. Kcmastrpc ( talk) 16:16, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
My edit was reverted, apparently because of WP:UNDUE: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=&diff=prev&oldid=1188999710. Forgive me if I misunderstand, but since there is no published alternative viewpoint, WP:UNDUE does not apply:
Neutrality requires that mainspace articles and pages fairly represent all significant viewpoints that have been published by reliable sources, in proportion to the prominence of each viewpoint in those sources.
To me, this implies that if there is only one viewpoint published by a reliable source, then it is:
If the argument was that my sources don't meet the criteria defined in WP:BLPSELFPUB for a reliable self-published source, then we could debate that, since they are borderline. But my edit does not, I believe, violate WP:UNDUE. Pandapip1 ( talk) 18:01, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
What's he done other than being a loudmouth about "right to repaair" Wikipedia:Notability applies here, and I fail to see how "random Youtuber" = notable. Also WP:SOAPBOX This is is not a soapbox for grandstanding about "right to repair." If there are noteworthy issues about right to repair then put them on Apple's page 27.96.192.138 ( talk) 05:16, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Should the censorship of the app name "Grayjay" be included? Annon-of-good-will ( talk) 12:29, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Rossman has been making videos where he argues for “ the moral, right” to pirate Contant, but then all the sudden will say “ don’t watch the content because it’s not worth it” which comes across more of a political reason than moral reason. I wonder if Rossman has ties to conservative or Randian idealogy groups. B ThatNerdyGuy ( talk) 07:56, 15 May 2024 (UTC) |