This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Religion Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Celts Low‑importance Loucetios is within the scope of WikiProject Celts, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the ancient Celts and the modern day Celtic nations. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks or take part in the discussion. Please Join, Create, and Assess.CeltsWikipedia:WikiProject CeltsTemplate:WikiProject CeltsCelts articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Gaul Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gaul, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gaul on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GaulWikipedia:WikiProject GaulTemplate:WikiProject GaulGaul articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Just a note of explanation for why I've opted for the spelling Loucetios: ou is about twice as common as eu, even in Latin spellings. This corresponds to a Gaulish diphthong /ow/ which Latin speakers sometimes equated with their own diphthong /ew/. As for -os vs. -us, Wikipedia seems to have a preference for -os in Celtic names; this represents the indigenous o-stem ending in the nominative singular. We could use the Latin equivalent -us (thus Loucetius), but after all, both these endings must be supplied from the basis of Latin o-stems in the dative -o anyway, so the indigenous Gaulish endings seem just as good to me. (Hope that's not too complicated for comprehension!) Quartier Latin1968 20:34, 11 June 2006 (UTC) reply