This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. Central Asia: Kazakhstan Lotfi Bin Ali is part of WikiProject Central Asia, a project to improve all Central Asia-related articles. This includes but is not limited to Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Tajikistan, Tibet, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Xinjiang and Central Asian portions of Iran, Pakistan and Russia, region-specific topics, and anything else related to Central Asia. If you would like to help improve this and other Central Asia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.Central AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Central AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Central AsiaCentral Asia articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Kazakhstan (assessed as Low-importance). Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Terrorism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Terrorism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on terrorism, individual terrorists, incidents and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TerrorismWikipedia:WikiProject TerrorismTemplate:WikiProject TerrorismTerrorism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Tunisia Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tunisia, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Tunisia. For more information, visit the project page.TunisiaWikipedia:WikiProject TunisiaTemplate:WikiProject TunisiaTunisia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Following up on this edit.

A similar section has been removed after a discussion on WP:BLPN so i am puzzled why this editor works against community consensus.

Sure the sections vary from article to article so ould you please explain.

1) What is the value of this section?

2) What is the topic of this section?

3) The source ^[1] of this information is a redacted primary source that has been interpreted by the the Wikipedia editor himself who wrote the section. That's WP:OR and should be removed. Why should we make and exception from one of our core policies?

Thank you. IQinn ( talk) 23:58, 17 May 2010 (UTC) reply

I don't agree that you have consensus to support your position.

This is not WP:OR. I am extremely puzzled that you keep accusing me of lapsing from WP:OR, as several contributors have pointed out to you that this is not OR, this in not SYNTH. As has been pointed out to you, many times, SYNTH is when a contributor cites a reference that asserts A, and another that asserts B, and then asserts or implies a new conclusion C, that is not referenced. Citing references that assert A, and assert B, without asserting or implying a new conclusion C, is not a lapse from SYNTH, is not a lapse from OR. I am going to repeat that several other contributors have explained this to you. I am frankly extremely puzzled as to why you keep claiming documenting the sources of the name variants lapses from OR, after all these explanations that it does not.

You have not responded to my point that even when an individual is as well known as Joseph Stalin or Mark Twain we explicitly document those individuals other names. Geo Swan ( talk) 12:48, 25 May 2010 (UTC) reply

I have ask you three particular questions regarding the content issue regarding this article here. You did not answer any of the three questions that are relevant for the discussion here on this talk page. Please do, so that we can make some progress as i said above the sections vary from article to article. So if you think we need the section here in this article please answer my questions above. 15:59, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Lotfi Bin Ali. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930184542/http://cageprisoners.com/articles.php?aid=3838 to http://cageprisoners.com/articles.php?aid=3838
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/1773140.stm
• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.brookings.edu%2F%7E%2Fmedia%2Fresearch%2Ffiles%2Freports%2F2008%2F12%2F16%2520detainees%2520wittes%2F1216_detainees_wittes.pdf&date=2012-06-22 to http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/research/files/reports/2008/12/16%20detainees%20wittes/1216_detainees_wittes.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:48, 26 May 2017 (UTC) reply