Lost: The Journey was a Media and drama good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Note, however that the decision has been appealed: WP:DRV#Lost:_The_Journey + + Lar: t/ c 03:21, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
The article has now been substantially rewritten to address the issues brought up in the AfD. Original Research has been removed, and it now includes sourced content. -- Leflyman Talk 17:53, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
I've moved this section form the article. Episode ratings/scores on TV.com (or other similar sites) are not sources of verifiable info since they are self-created. Television without Pity "recaps" are intended to critical of everything for snark value. Reviews there may be funny, but not particularly neutral.
Reception The episode recieved an average score of 6.99 from 256 votes on TV.com, [1] which is lower than both the average score for an original episode and other recap episodes. [2] The recapper from Television Without Pity called the episode an, "hour's worth of 'previously on Lost,'" and said "they're packaging this travesty as a primer to get up to speed on the show" and that ABC is, "making some easy advertising money." [3] Before the episode aired, a jouurnalist from the St. Louis Post anticipated the episode to help viewers find some answers to the show mysteries.
-- Leflyman Talk 18:05, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
References
I'm sorry, but I do not feel that this page meets GA criteria as I do not think it is comprehensive enough. I admit that many of the GAs (which are also Television episodes) are also on the short side, but this article comprises, at best 3 paragraphs and in my view, it fails on GA criteria #3 as it is not broad in its coverage. I realize it is a clip show, but perhaps you could add a short summary of the episode and what it covers. If you feel that I am wrong in my review, feel free to ask for a second opinion or resubmit it for another review. -- Scorpion 0422 02:30, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Lost: The Journey was a Media and drama good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Note, however that the decision has been appealed: WP:DRV#Lost:_The_Journey + + Lar: t/ c 03:21, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
The article has now been substantially rewritten to address the issues brought up in the AfD. Original Research has been removed, and it now includes sourced content. -- Leflyman Talk 17:53, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
I've moved this section form the article. Episode ratings/scores on TV.com (or other similar sites) are not sources of verifiable info since they are self-created. Television without Pity "recaps" are intended to critical of everything for snark value. Reviews there may be funny, but not particularly neutral.
Reception The episode recieved an average score of 6.99 from 256 votes on TV.com, [1] which is lower than both the average score for an original episode and other recap episodes. [2] The recapper from Television Without Pity called the episode an, "hour's worth of 'previously on Lost,'" and said "they're packaging this travesty as a primer to get up to speed on the show" and that ABC is, "making some easy advertising money." [3] Before the episode aired, a jouurnalist from the St. Louis Post anticipated the episode to help viewers find some answers to the show mysteries.
-- Leflyman Talk 18:05, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
References
I'm sorry, but I do not feel that this page meets GA criteria as I do not think it is comprehensive enough. I admit that many of the GAs (which are also Television episodes) are also on the short side, but this article comprises, at best 3 paragraphs and in my view, it fails on GA criteria #3 as it is not broad in its coverage. I realize it is a clip show, but perhaps you could add a short summary of the episode and what it covers. If you feel that I am wrong in my review, feel free to ask for a second opinion or resubmit it for another review. -- Scorpion 0422 02:30, 30 August 2007 (UTC)