![]() | Losh, Wilson and Bell has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: January 31, 2014. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | A fact from Losh, Wilson and Bell appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 23 April 2012 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Cirt ( talk · contribs) 05:47, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
— Cirt ( talk) 05:36, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
NOTE: Please respond, below entire Image review, and not interspersed throughout, thanks!
Please work on addressing these relatively easy issues, above.
Cheers,
— Cirt ( talk) 05:40, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Chiswick Chap ( talk) 19:34, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of January 31, 2014, compares against the six good article criteria:
If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— — Cirt ( talk) 02:14, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
![]() | Losh, Wilson and Bell has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: January 31, 2014. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | A fact from Losh, Wilson and Bell appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 23 April 2012 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Cirt ( talk · contribs) 05:47, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
— Cirt ( talk) 05:36, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
NOTE: Please respond, below entire Image review, and not interspersed throughout, thanks!
Please work on addressing these relatively easy issues, above.
Cheers,
— Cirt ( talk) 05:40, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Chiswick Chap ( talk) 19:34, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of January 31, 2014, compares against the six good article criteria:
If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— — Cirt ( talk) 02:14, 31 January 2014 (UTC)