![]() | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Besides the bid history section, much of the other sections is written in a totally confusing manner and not understandable at all. It also seems that a lot of this confusing text has been copied and pasted from the bid committee website. For future reference, just a PSA, please don't copy and paste content like that. - SantiLak ( talk) 22:57, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
es:Candidatura de Los Ángeles a los Juegos Olímpicos de 2024
also needs HELP. -- Redspork02 ( talk) 22:50, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
I have added {{ Copypaste}} to the article, based on the Earwig's Copyvio Detector review of the page. A lot of the article is word for word from the sources that are listed. Elisfkc ( talk) 18:57, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see
"using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or
"donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 ( talk) 15:04, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Not moved.Weighing the arguments used by both the sides, the oppose !votes are much stronger in rationale.A new article may be created about the 2028 bidding.( non-admin closure) Godric on Leave ( talk) 15:56, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
Los Angeles bid for the 2024 Summer Olympics → Los Angeles bid for the 2024 and 2028 Summer Olympics – Should this be moved to Los Angeles bid for the 2024 and 2028 Summer Olympics now? Jmj713 ( talk) 20:56, 31 July 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. — JFG talk 07:35, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
Since the IOC requires "A 2024 Bid" to "drop out" and re-apply for 2028 exclusively as stated at the 131st IOC session. A new Los Angeles bid for the 2028 Summer Olympics should be created. THe IOC will officially name it a 2028 bid and will officially vote on 9/13/2017. -- 158.61.0.239 ( talk) 22:44, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
This is too complex for a quick-and-dirty move, or cavalier comments about all else being "dumb". After the second move by someone who is more interested making moves than the actual article, I've requested move protection until we can hammer something out. It strikes me that there are a couple of issues to be considered:
I'm in the camp that says no move, and a redirect. Everything that happened grew out of the 2024 bid. A subsection of the article, discussing the IOC 2028 offer and LA acceptance can be included in the article under the standing title. It's the most accurate presentation of what actually happened. (I'd also encourage discussants to review the coverage in the LA Times, which has been extensive, before commenting.) ----Dr.Margi ✉ 17:40, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
There are not two separate bids. The 2024 bid essentially became the 2028 bid. We don't need two articles covering the same process. Therefore, the title needs to reflect both years. Just either one will be factually incorrect. Jmj713 ( talk) 14:56, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
Well, it's been a week now, and it looks like only DrMargi wants things the way they were. Me, Jmj, PhilipTerryGraham and SuperNintendoChalmers want it as both 2024 and 2028; two IPs want it at 2028 only. I'd have to say consensus is in favor of 2024 and 2028. p b p 00:55, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
Oppose Move The article is about the "bid" for the 2024 Olympics. LA never put in a bid for the 2028 Olympics, so changing the article title would be incorrect.-- JOJ Hutton 01:17, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
The 2028 Bid Process should have its own page, no matter how short the process was. LA didn't lose. Both Paris and LA were given the option of 2028. Per press release, LA has to "drop out" and re submit 2028 plans and sign 2028 city contract. -- Redspork02 ( talk) 21:50, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
I have re-added, albeit with slightly different wording, a sentence about the report before the LA City Council that was published this week in the Los Angeles Times. I believe mentioning this report is appropriate, as the article is primarily paraphrased rather than, as another edit puts it, "plagiarized" p b p 15:26, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
I have re-added a second source for the August 11, 2017 LA City Council Vote. Two sources are better than one. Besides, we've got plenty of sources from the L.A. Times, and some sources from elsewhere would probably do this article good. The source I added is from Southern California Public Radio/KPCC (the local NPR affiliate and assuredly a reliable source), where I learned of the vote yesterday. p b p 14:05, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Los Angeles bid for the 2024 Summer Olympics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:41, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Besides the bid history section, much of the other sections is written in a totally confusing manner and not understandable at all. It also seems that a lot of this confusing text has been copied and pasted from the bid committee website. For future reference, just a PSA, please don't copy and paste content like that. - SantiLak ( talk) 22:57, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
es:Candidatura de Los Ángeles a los Juegos Olímpicos de 2024
also needs HELP. -- Redspork02 ( talk) 22:50, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
I have added {{ Copypaste}} to the article, based on the Earwig's Copyvio Detector review of the page. A lot of the article is word for word from the sources that are listed. Elisfkc ( talk) 18:57, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see
"using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or
"donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 ( talk) 15:04, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Not moved.Weighing the arguments used by both the sides, the oppose !votes are much stronger in rationale.A new article may be created about the 2028 bidding.( non-admin closure) Godric on Leave ( talk) 15:56, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
Los Angeles bid for the 2024 Summer Olympics → Los Angeles bid for the 2024 and 2028 Summer Olympics – Should this be moved to Los Angeles bid for the 2024 and 2028 Summer Olympics now? Jmj713 ( talk) 20:56, 31 July 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. — JFG talk 07:35, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
Since the IOC requires "A 2024 Bid" to "drop out" and re-apply for 2028 exclusively as stated at the 131st IOC session. A new Los Angeles bid for the 2028 Summer Olympics should be created. THe IOC will officially name it a 2028 bid and will officially vote on 9/13/2017. -- 158.61.0.239 ( talk) 22:44, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
This is too complex for a quick-and-dirty move, or cavalier comments about all else being "dumb". After the second move by someone who is more interested making moves than the actual article, I've requested move protection until we can hammer something out. It strikes me that there are a couple of issues to be considered:
I'm in the camp that says no move, and a redirect. Everything that happened grew out of the 2024 bid. A subsection of the article, discussing the IOC 2028 offer and LA acceptance can be included in the article under the standing title. It's the most accurate presentation of what actually happened. (I'd also encourage discussants to review the coverage in the LA Times, which has been extensive, before commenting.) ----Dr.Margi ✉ 17:40, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
There are not two separate bids. The 2024 bid essentially became the 2028 bid. We don't need two articles covering the same process. Therefore, the title needs to reflect both years. Just either one will be factually incorrect. Jmj713 ( talk) 14:56, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
Well, it's been a week now, and it looks like only DrMargi wants things the way they were. Me, Jmj, PhilipTerryGraham and SuperNintendoChalmers want it as both 2024 and 2028; two IPs want it at 2028 only. I'd have to say consensus is in favor of 2024 and 2028. p b p 00:55, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
Oppose Move The article is about the "bid" for the 2024 Olympics. LA never put in a bid for the 2028 Olympics, so changing the article title would be incorrect.-- JOJ Hutton 01:17, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
The 2028 Bid Process should have its own page, no matter how short the process was. LA didn't lose. Both Paris and LA were given the option of 2028. Per press release, LA has to "drop out" and re submit 2028 plans and sign 2028 city contract. -- Redspork02 ( talk) 21:50, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
I have re-added, albeit with slightly different wording, a sentence about the report before the LA City Council that was published this week in the Los Angeles Times. I believe mentioning this report is appropriate, as the article is primarily paraphrased rather than, as another edit puts it, "plagiarized" p b p 15:26, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
I have re-added a second source for the August 11, 2017 LA City Council Vote. Two sources are better than one. Besides, we've got plenty of sources from the L.A. Times, and some sources from elsewhere would probably do this article good. The source I added is from Southern California Public Radio/KPCC (the local NPR affiliate and assuredly a reliable source), where I learned of the vote yesterday. p b p 14:05, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Los Angeles bid for the 2024 Summer Olympics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:41, 6 January 2018 (UTC)