This
level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article contains a translation of Lope de Vega from es.wikipedia. ( 535798389 et seq.) |
I reverted a passage referring to Hugh Heffner (sic) and other irrelevant crudities. If there's a reason for that to be there, please reinstate and explain here. Militiades 15:28, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
I corrected some vandalism in the page.
Editors, please be advised that the entire text of the article between the opening paragraph and the References section was removed, per the edit summary "entire article is unsourced", without prior tagging or discussion, by Otolemur crassicaudatus on 24 March. I reverted shortly thereafter, with a request for discussion prior to blanket removal of the majority of the article. "O.c." reverted back within a few minutes, citing WP:RS and WP:V in the edit summary. I also left a message on his talk page, protesting the behavior; the response, in summary, is that he believes he is appropriately enforcing WP:V. The article, is, actually, not entirely unsourced, because it has a 1911-Britannica tag.
I am requesting the assistance of editors interested in the article; it truly could use better references; we also need to get the removed text restored, hopefully without edit warring; the text needs to "be there" in order to be able to add citations where appropriate.
As time allows (have to "run" off to work now), I will also request assistance at the Wikiprojects which would have interest in this article: Theatre, Bio, and Spain. Thanks, Lini ( talk) 11:39, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
I have placed tags on this article requesting work on the article to improve the tone (needs updates from 1911 Britannica verbiage to be more consistent with 21st century encyclopedic tone) and for the incorporation of additional references. Thanks, Lini ( talk) 01:56, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
I've posted the following request for assistance at the talk pages of the Spain, Theatre, and Biography (Arts and Entertainment) projects:
|
-- Lini ( talk) 02:55, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
I removed the title "El Persona Quien Bebe Leche" because it's not one of Lope de Vega's plays. You won't find any source for it other than wikipedia itself. It was added almost a year ago by user 72.2.102.250 ( http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Lope_de_Vega&diff=next&oldid=173168004).
-- Sopotra ( talk) 09:39, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
I'm not sure I understand the sense of this part of the introduction. Is Spanish theater's becoming a mass cultural phenomenon supposed to be that from which Lope de Vega renewed it, or is it a result of Lope de Vega's renewal? This is a really pedantic question, so I apologize if it turns out to be nitpicking.
-- 168.122.116.241 ( talk) 17:18, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
Had he written one play per month, it would have taken 150 years to complete such a task. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.33.35.121 ( talk) 20:14, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
Under Life he libeled Elena and 'his' family. The Spanish article, which quotes a libelous verse, seems to confirm the more plausible idea that he libeled her and her family. A mistaken, or automatic, translation of spanish 'su' as 'his' rather than 'her'? Richard Robert ( talk) 13:15, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
The Spanish page says Lope's exile was 8 years from the court, and 2 years from Castille. Richard Robert ( talk) 13:30, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
I have just modified the article according to the facts reported in the (featured) Spanish article as pertaining to 'Libeled who?' and 'Length of exile' comments above. Richard Robert ( talk) 21:27, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
The introduction to this page says, "... the sheer volume of his literary output is unequalled, making him one of the most prolific authors in the history of literature."
If the volume is unequalled, he is not "one of the most prolific," he is the most prolific.
If it cannot be proven that the volume is unequalled, then it shouldn't say so.
Earlymod ( talk) 22:55, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
Why do we call him Lope, and not Vega? Even if the Spanish have this convention, do we definitely follow it in English? Thanks a lot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.229.116.186 ( talk) 16:15, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
This
level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article contains a translation of Lope de Vega from es.wikipedia. ( 535798389 et seq.) |
I reverted a passage referring to Hugh Heffner (sic) and other irrelevant crudities. If there's a reason for that to be there, please reinstate and explain here. Militiades 15:28, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
I corrected some vandalism in the page.
Editors, please be advised that the entire text of the article between the opening paragraph and the References section was removed, per the edit summary "entire article is unsourced", without prior tagging or discussion, by Otolemur crassicaudatus on 24 March. I reverted shortly thereafter, with a request for discussion prior to blanket removal of the majority of the article. "O.c." reverted back within a few minutes, citing WP:RS and WP:V in the edit summary. I also left a message on his talk page, protesting the behavior; the response, in summary, is that he believes he is appropriately enforcing WP:V. The article, is, actually, not entirely unsourced, because it has a 1911-Britannica tag.
I am requesting the assistance of editors interested in the article; it truly could use better references; we also need to get the removed text restored, hopefully without edit warring; the text needs to "be there" in order to be able to add citations where appropriate.
As time allows (have to "run" off to work now), I will also request assistance at the Wikiprojects which would have interest in this article: Theatre, Bio, and Spain. Thanks, Lini ( talk) 11:39, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
I have placed tags on this article requesting work on the article to improve the tone (needs updates from 1911 Britannica verbiage to be more consistent with 21st century encyclopedic tone) and for the incorporation of additional references. Thanks, Lini ( talk) 01:56, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
I've posted the following request for assistance at the talk pages of the Spain, Theatre, and Biography (Arts and Entertainment) projects:
|
-- Lini ( talk) 02:55, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
I removed the title "El Persona Quien Bebe Leche" because it's not one of Lope de Vega's plays. You won't find any source for it other than wikipedia itself. It was added almost a year ago by user 72.2.102.250 ( http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Lope_de_Vega&diff=next&oldid=173168004).
-- Sopotra ( talk) 09:39, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
I'm not sure I understand the sense of this part of the introduction. Is Spanish theater's becoming a mass cultural phenomenon supposed to be that from which Lope de Vega renewed it, or is it a result of Lope de Vega's renewal? This is a really pedantic question, so I apologize if it turns out to be nitpicking.
-- 168.122.116.241 ( talk) 17:18, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
Had he written one play per month, it would have taken 150 years to complete such a task. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.33.35.121 ( talk) 20:14, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
Under Life he libeled Elena and 'his' family. The Spanish article, which quotes a libelous verse, seems to confirm the more plausible idea that he libeled her and her family. A mistaken, or automatic, translation of spanish 'su' as 'his' rather than 'her'? Richard Robert ( talk) 13:15, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
The Spanish page says Lope's exile was 8 years from the court, and 2 years from Castille. Richard Robert ( talk) 13:30, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
I have just modified the article according to the facts reported in the (featured) Spanish article as pertaining to 'Libeled who?' and 'Length of exile' comments above. Richard Robert ( talk) 21:27, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
The introduction to this page says, "... the sheer volume of his literary output is unequalled, making him one of the most prolific authors in the history of literature."
If the volume is unequalled, he is not "one of the most prolific," he is the most prolific.
If it cannot be proven that the volume is unequalled, then it shouldn't say so.
Earlymod ( talk) 22:55, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
Why do we call him Lope, and not Vega? Even if the Spanish have this convention, do we definitely follow it in English? Thanks a lot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.229.116.186 ( talk) 16:15, 19 September 2020 (UTC)