This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Somerset, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Somerset on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SomersetWikipedia:WikiProject SomersetTemplate:WikiProject SomersetSomerset articles
The title of this page refers properly to a hill of height 365m, on the flanks of which happen to sit this former enclosure. I'd suggest the title of the article which then follows be changed to accurately reflect the content eg 'Croydon Hill hill-fort' or similar and that the title 'Croydon Hill' be reserved for the natural feature which bears that name. Otherwise it is misleading - I was myself misled in arriving at this page, expecting to find a different article! cheers
Geopersona (
talk)
19:35, 1 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Interesting. The
pastscape reference is about "Longwood" and talks about Longwood enclosure (also known as Long Wood Enclosure, or as Croydon Hill hillslope enclosure). The other specific reference used at
Somerset Historic Environment Record is about "The Castles (hillfort), N of Surridge Farm, Bathealton" which is about the wp article
Castles Camp. The lat and long on the article point to a different site to those on the
Entry of the National Heritage List for England which is titled: Later prehistoric defended enclosure, Long Wood. There is something seriously wrong with this article, but I'm not (yet) sure exactly what it is.—
Rodtalk20:41, 1 December 2014 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Somerset, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Somerset on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SomersetWikipedia:WikiProject SomersetTemplate:WikiProject SomersetSomerset articles
The title of this page refers properly to a hill of height 365m, on the flanks of which happen to sit this former enclosure. I'd suggest the title of the article which then follows be changed to accurately reflect the content eg 'Croydon Hill hill-fort' or similar and that the title 'Croydon Hill' be reserved for the natural feature which bears that name. Otherwise it is misleading - I was myself misled in arriving at this page, expecting to find a different article! cheers
Geopersona (
talk)
19:35, 1 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Interesting. The
pastscape reference is about "Longwood" and talks about Longwood enclosure (also known as Long Wood Enclosure, or as Croydon Hill hillslope enclosure). The other specific reference used at
Somerset Historic Environment Record is about "The Castles (hillfort), N of Surridge Farm, Bathealton" which is about the wp article
Castles Camp. The lat and long on the article point to a different site to those on the
Entry of the National Heritage List for England which is titled: Later prehistoric defended enclosure, Long Wood. There is something seriously wrong with this article, but I'm not (yet) sure exactly what it is.—
Rodtalk20:41, 1 December 2014 (UTC)reply