![]() | Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
![]() | This article follows the Law Manual of Style. It uses the Bluebook legal referencing style. This citation style uses standardized abbreviations, such as "N.Y. Times" for The New York Times, and has specific typeface formatting requirements. Please review those standards before making style or formatting changes. Information on this referencing style may be obtained at: Cornell's Basic Legal Citation site. |
![]() | Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: February 27, 2014. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer:
Seabuckthorn (
talk ·
contribs) 00:09, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Nominator:
GregJackP
Boomer!
Hi! My review for this article will be here shortly.
--
Seabuckthorn
♥ 00:09, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
1: Well-written
Check for
WP:LEAD:
|
![]() Check for
WP:LAYOUT:
|
![]() Check for
WP:WTW:
Check for
WP:MOSFICT:
|
![]()
|
2: Verifiable with no original research
![]() Check for
WP:RS: Cross-checked with other FAs: United States v. Lara, Ex parte Crow Dog, Menominee Tribe v. United States
|
![]() Check for inline citations
WP:MINREF:
|
![]()
|
3: Broad in its coverage
a.
Major aspects:
![]() |
---|
![]() Cross-checked with other FAs: United States v. Lara, Ex parte Crow Dog, Menominee Tribe v. United States
|
b.
Focused:
![]() |
---|
![]()
|
4: Neutral
![]() 4. Fair representation without bias:
|
5: Stable: No
edit wars, etc: Yes
6: Images Done (Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license) (PD)
Images:
![]() |
---|
![]() 6: Images are
tagged with their
copyright status, and
valid fair use rationales are provided for
non-free content:
6: Images are provided if possible and are
relevant to the topic, and have
suitable captions:
|
As per the above checklist, there are no issues with the article and it’s a GA. The prose quality in particular has been fantastic in all your articles. I’m inspired a lot by your conscientiousness. Thanks, GregJackP, very much for your diligence in writing such great articles.
Promoting the article to GA status.
--
Seabuckthorn
♥ 22:23, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
![]() | Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
![]() | This article follows the Law Manual of Style. It uses the Bluebook legal referencing style. This citation style uses standardized abbreviations, such as "N.Y. Times" for The New York Times, and has specific typeface formatting requirements. Please review those standards before making style or formatting changes. Information on this referencing style may be obtained at: Cornell's Basic Legal Citation site. |
![]() | Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: February 27, 2014. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer:
Seabuckthorn (
talk ·
contribs) 00:09, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Nominator:
GregJackP
Boomer!
Hi! My review for this article will be here shortly.
--
Seabuckthorn
♥ 00:09, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
1: Well-written
Check for
WP:LEAD:
|
![]() Check for
WP:LAYOUT:
|
![]() Check for
WP:WTW:
Check for
WP:MOSFICT:
|
![]()
|
2: Verifiable with no original research
![]() Check for
WP:RS: Cross-checked with other FAs: United States v. Lara, Ex parte Crow Dog, Menominee Tribe v. United States
|
![]() Check for inline citations
WP:MINREF:
|
![]()
|
3: Broad in its coverage
a.
Major aspects:
![]() |
---|
![]() Cross-checked with other FAs: United States v. Lara, Ex parte Crow Dog, Menominee Tribe v. United States
|
b.
Focused:
![]() |
---|
![]()
|
4: Neutral
![]() 4. Fair representation without bias:
|
5: Stable: No
edit wars, etc: Yes
6: Images Done (Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license) (PD)
Images:
![]() |
---|
![]() 6: Images are
tagged with their
copyright status, and
valid fair use rationales are provided for
non-free content:
6: Images are provided if possible and are
relevant to the topic, and have
suitable captions:
|
As per the above checklist, there are no issues with the article and it’s a GA. The prose quality in particular has been fantastic in all your articles. I’m inspired a lot by your conscientiousness. Thanks, GregJackP, very much for your diligence in writing such great articles.
Promoting the article to GA status.
--
Seabuckthorn
♥ 22:23, 27 February 2014 (UTC)