![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
theres a reference to a decent superconductivity text book at the bottom, so i removed the "references" tag. if its necessary, i can add a further derivation to the article, and cite two other texts which are considered standard solid state textbooks:
if anybody actually wants this, email me at andrew.princep@student.curtin.edu.au
There's a pretty bad error in this article; the equation for the penetration depth is inverted. (Check the units!) It also assumes CGS units with c set to 1. Referencing "Introduction to Solid State Physics" by Charles Kittel, I'm going to take a stab at fixing this. -- Starwed 19:00, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
I rewrote the article recently, so the problems mentioned above should be fixed. I changed the units to standard Gaussian units because that's what most of my references use. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Csmallw ( talk • contribs) 21:16, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Is there any reason to use the term "London Gauge" instead of the common electrodynamics name "Coulomb Gauge" for div A=0 in section 1? (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gauge_fixing#Coulomb_gauge) 129.13.72.198 ( talk) 13:53, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
superconductivity states:
The Meissner effect was given a phenomenological explanation by the brothers Fritz and Heinz London, who showed that the electromagnetic free energy in a superconductor is minimized provided
but this article states something slightly different.
Neither explicate, refer or cite regarding 'phenomenological' in the context of physical law.
WP has no article on PE; I would draw your attention to a major work on P'al mathematics by a non-'phenomenologist'.
Please see Hermann Weyl and related on phenomenology and physics.
Please see the article on Heisenberg an approaches to models and explanation based on observed phenomena and matrix mathematics.
Of some interest in this regard may be the status of Feynman diagrams as a topic in themselves apart from phenomena.
A brief discussion of Ohm's law might be useful in a PE article ? Snell's Law ?
G. Robert Shiplett 11:38, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
theres a reference to a decent superconductivity text book at the bottom, so i removed the "references" tag. if its necessary, i can add a further derivation to the article, and cite two other texts which are considered standard solid state textbooks:
if anybody actually wants this, email me at andrew.princep@student.curtin.edu.au
There's a pretty bad error in this article; the equation for the penetration depth is inverted. (Check the units!) It also assumes CGS units with c set to 1. Referencing "Introduction to Solid State Physics" by Charles Kittel, I'm going to take a stab at fixing this. -- Starwed 19:00, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
I rewrote the article recently, so the problems mentioned above should be fixed. I changed the units to standard Gaussian units because that's what most of my references use. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Csmallw ( talk • contribs) 21:16, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Is there any reason to use the term "London Gauge" instead of the common electrodynamics name "Coulomb Gauge" for div A=0 in section 1? (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gauge_fixing#Coulomb_gauge) 129.13.72.198 ( talk) 13:53, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
superconductivity states:
The Meissner effect was given a phenomenological explanation by the brothers Fritz and Heinz London, who showed that the electromagnetic free energy in a superconductor is minimized provided
but this article states something slightly different.
Neither explicate, refer or cite regarding 'phenomenological' in the context of physical law.
WP has no article on PE; I would draw your attention to a major work on P'al mathematics by a non-'phenomenologist'.
Please see Hermann Weyl and related on phenomenology and physics.
Please see the article on Heisenberg an approaches to models and explanation based on observed phenomena and matrix mathematics.
Of some interest in this regard may be the status of Feynman diagrams as a topic in themselves apart from phenomena.
A brief discussion of Ohm's law might be useful in a PE article ? Snell's Law ?
G. Robert Shiplett 11:38, 13 August 2012 (UTC)