This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Overseas Territories, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
British Overseas Territories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British Overseas TerritoriesWikipedia:WikiProject British Overseas TerritoriesTemplate:WikiProject British Overseas TerritoriesBritish Overseas Territories articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject South America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
South America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject South AmericaTemplate:WikiProject South AmericaSouth America articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Disproportionate weight is given to the to protestors. The (supportive) crowd is numbered at 300k; the protestors are not numbered but were relatively few. Would there be objection to de-weighting the protests?
JDAWiseman (
talk)
23:32, 1 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Royal family exclusion
The fact that the royal family was not part of the parade has received coverage, and I believe this "snub" was covered in The Crown, if I'm not mistaken. If it is notable, it should be included in the article.
Park3r (
talk)
02:32, 11 January 2023 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Overseas Territories, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
British Overseas Territories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British Overseas TerritoriesWikipedia:WikiProject British Overseas TerritoriesTemplate:WikiProject British Overseas TerritoriesBritish Overseas Territories articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject South America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
South America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject South AmericaTemplate:WikiProject South AmericaSouth America articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Disproportionate weight is given to the to protestors. The (supportive) crowd is numbered at 300k; the protestors are not numbered but were relatively few. Would there be objection to de-weighting the protests?
JDAWiseman (
talk)
23:32, 1 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Royal family exclusion
The fact that the royal family was not part of the parade has received coverage, and I believe this "snub" was covered in The Crown, if I'm not mistaken. If it is notable, it should be included in the article.
Park3r (
talk)
02:32, 11 January 2023 (UTC)reply