This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

• This article: Ideographs, such as Chase Bank, are completely abstract forms
• Another article: The Chase logo is a stylized representation of the primitive water pipes laid by the Manhattan Company

This is conflicting, isn't it? A completely abstract logo is e.g. the one for the Norwegian University of Science and Technology by Bruno Oldani. He has stated that the logo “contains no major symbolism” ( in Norwegian).

Also, the term brandmark redirects here, but isn't mentioned. Should it be?

Finally, should the term ideograph, which is used, be defined or have a link elsewhere?

Bjornte ( talk) 08:34, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Yes, the whole article could do with a cohesive rewrite, if you make a start I shall try and help Unibond ( talk) 14:30, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

ENDALKACHEW DEMELASH IMPORT & EXPORT — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.55.111.6 ( talk) 09:48, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Cancelled for the time being.