This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Log Cabin Wilderness Camp is part of the Scouting WikiProject, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
Scouting and
Guiding on the Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to boy and girl organizations,
WAGGGS and
WOSM organizations as well as those not so affiliated, country and region-specific topics, and anything else related to Scouting. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.ScoutingWikipedia:WikiProject ScoutingTemplate:WikiProject ScoutingScouting articles
Bold edit, never discussed, so can (and should) be reverted. Next time, there should be a discussion first.
Purplebackpack89 (
talk) 06:48, 22 November 2009 (UTC)reply
The article had already been tagged for merging on 2008-09-28, and after five days without comment it was merged on 2008-10-02. You then reverted on 2009-02-12 without any edit summary or any other form of explanation. This article still consists of material which has been copied from the history section of the
subject's website, and does not attribute sources of any kind, either in terms of copied material, or in order to establish notability. So, would you actually present some reasoning for why you've now reverted the redirect twice, and why this article shouldn't be deleted/redirected? -
Optigan13 (
talk) 22:24, 25 November 2009 (UTC)reply
The first time I split it was because it dominated the article it had been merged into (at least half of the merged article was about Log Cabin), and because there was no consensus. The second time was for the above reasons (bold edit, never discussed). I believe the article to be notable enough to be on this Wikipedia, and if this is where you register comment on merge or not, strongly oppose merge. Have a nice day.
Purplebackpack89 (
talk) 01:23, 26 November 2009 (UTC)reply
My first recreation of the article was in reaction to
this, which as you can see is dominated by Log Cabin
Purplebackpack89 (
talk) 16:01, 1 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Yes, that copy and paste dominated that page. But now that we've removed trimmed the content listed on the LA council page, and removed the content from the Wilderness Camp's website there isn't a major difference between what is presented there and here. I'm also concerned that there aren't any sources to backup up the general notability of this subject, or even to verify the elevation of the camp. -
Optigan13 (
talk) 01:08, 2 December 2009 (UTC)reply
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Log Cabin Wilderness Camp is part of the Scouting WikiProject, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
Scouting and
Guiding on the Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to boy and girl organizations,
WAGGGS and
WOSM organizations as well as those not so affiliated, country and region-specific topics, and anything else related to Scouting. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.ScoutingWikipedia:WikiProject ScoutingTemplate:WikiProject ScoutingScouting articles
Bold edit, never discussed, so can (and should) be reverted. Next time, there should be a discussion first.
Purplebackpack89 (
talk) 06:48, 22 November 2009 (UTC)reply
The article had already been tagged for merging on 2008-09-28, and after five days without comment it was merged on 2008-10-02. You then reverted on 2009-02-12 without any edit summary or any other form of explanation. This article still consists of material which has been copied from the history section of the
subject's website, and does not attribute sources of any kind, either in terms of copied material, or in order to establish notability. So, would you actually present some reasoning for why you've now reverted the redirect twice, and why this article shouldn't be deleted/redirected? -
Optigan13 (
talk) 22:24, 25 November 2009 (UTC)reply
The first time I split it was because it dominated the article it had been merged into (at least half of the merged article was about Log Cabin), and because there was no consensus. The second time was for the above reasons (bold edit, never discussed). I believe the article to be notable enough to be on this Wikipedia, and if this is where you register comment on merge or not, strongly oppose merge. Have a nice day.
Purplebackpack89 (
talk) 01:23, 26 November 2009 (UTC)reply
My first recreation of the article was in reaction to
this, which as you can see is dominated by Log Cabin
Purplebackpack89 (
talk) 16:01, 1 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Yes, that copy and paste dominated that page. But now that we've removed trimmed the content listed on the LA council page, and removed the content from the Wilderness Camp's website there isn't a major difference between what is presented there and here. I'm also concerned that there aren't any sources to backup up the general notability of this subject, or even to verify the elevation of the camp. -
Optigan13 (
talk) 01:08, 2 December 2009 (UTC)reply