![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Locus Award for Best First Novel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:12, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
I propose to remove the warning that this article over-relies on primary sources. Given the page in question is a list of awards by the magazine Locus, and given the primary source in question is the magazine Locus, and no secondary analysis can have a bearing on the accuracy, analysis or interpretation of the content, I don't see why it is necessary within the spirit of the warning?
The 1983 award was Clare Bell's Ratha's Creature, but isn't it Donald Kingsbury's Courtship Rite? Excuse me for machine translation. -- 影佑樹 ( talk) 15:21, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Locus Award for Best First Novel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:12, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
I propose to remove the warning that this article over-relies on primary sources. Given the page in question is a list of awards by the magazine Locus, and given the primary source in question is the magazine Locus, and no secondary analysis can have a bearing on the accuracy, analysis or interpretation of the content, I don't see why it is necessary within the spirit of the warning?
The 1983 award was Clare Bell's Ratha's Creature, but isn't it Donald Kingsbury's Courtship Rite? Excuse me for machine translation. -- 影佑樹 ( talk) 15:21, 29 November 2021 (UTC)