![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Special thanks to the archive researchers at the National Air and Space Museum for providing me with the SAE report and the Aviation Week articles on which I based this article.
My current understanding of the transcontinental flights by the two Constitution follows:
I will update this article as my understanding changes or grows. Willy Logan 00:16, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
I spent some time exploring the Constitution number 2 at Opalocka in the late 1960s. The aircraft was to have been converted to a flying restaurant or some such. It was not 'torched' by vandals, but in an insurance scheme.
The damage was actually slight. The aircraft was not scrapped at Opalocka but some miles away where it had been moved. I also had a chance to discuss the airplane with Tony LeVier at the IPMS convention in Miami during 1968. The aircraft was underpowered according to him. I realize this personal knowledge is classified as 'original research' (and indeed I did explore the airplane) so I have not bothered to post this on the page.
This information is given for those who might wish to know. Mark Lincoln Mark Lincoln ( talk) 20:52, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Everyone, I'm very sorry that an attempted good faith edit of mine caused nearly the entire page to be blanked. I was in the middle of editing the external links section only (or so I thought) when Firefox crashed out on me, likely because I had far too many tabs open. When Firefox restored my tabs, somehow instead of my editing what I thought was just the external links section I was apparently editing the entire article instead. I still don't quite understand the mechanics of what happened, but I just wanted to ensure everyone that it was completely accidental, and I'm very sorry didn't catch the error on my own right after it happened. -- Itsfullofstars ( talk) 17:00, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
This should probably be mentioned here: According to SPIEGEL online http://einestages.spiegel.de/static/topicalbumbackground/4757/groessenwahn_hoch_x.html the Lockheed R6V Constitution took over the passenger record held for two decades by the Dornier_Do_X. (Unfortunately the article is in German, but it does have 19 nice photographs of the Do X.) Epsiloner ( talk) 13:49, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Both airplanes were lemons.
Mark Lincoln (
talk)
10:36, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
The R6O also tested JATO takeoffs with six rockets mounted on the rear of the fuselage. I saw a video on Youtube where the rockets were mounted in the wings. Vgy7ujm ( talk) 03:04, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
Is this aircraft not very similar to the Boeing Stratocruiser ? It seems curious to me that it is not not included on the list of comparable aircraft. Eregli bob ( talk) 09:44, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
Mark Lincoln ( talk) 10:34, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lockheed R6V Constitution. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 15:37, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Special thanks to the archive researchers at the National Air and Space Museum for providing me with the SAE report and the Aviation Week articles on which I based this article.
My current understanding of the transcontinental flights by the two Constitution follows:
I will update this article as my understanding changes or grows. Willy Logan 00:16, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
I spent some time exploring the Constitution number 2 at Opalocka in the late 1960s. The aircraft was to have been converted to a flying restaurant or some such. It was not 'torched' by vandals, but in an insurance scheme.
The damage was actually slight. The aircraft was not scrapped at Opalocka but some miles away where it had been moved. I also had a chance to discuss the airplane with Tony LeVier at the IPMS convention in Miami during 1968. The aircraft was underpowered according to him. I realize this personal knowledge is classified as 'original research' (and indeed I did explore the airplane) so I have not bothered to post this on the page.
This information is given for those who might wish to know. Mark Lincoln Mark Lincoln ( talk) 20:52, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Everyone, I'm very sorry that an attempted good faith edit of mine caused nearly the entire page to be blanked. I was in the middle of editing the external links section only (or so I thought) when Firefox crashed out on me, likely because I had far too many tabs open. When Firefox restored my tabs, somehow instead of my editing what I thought was just the external links section I was apparently editing the entire article instead. I still don't quite understand the mechanics of what happened, but I just wanted to ensure everyone that it was completely accidental, and I'm very sorry didn't catch the error on my own right after it happened. -- Itsfullofstars ( talk) 17:00, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
This should probably be mentioned here: According to SPIEGEL online http://einestages.spiegel.de/static/topicalbumbackground/4757/groessenwahn_hoch_x.html the Lockheed R6V Constitution took over the passenger record held for two decades by the Dornier_Do_X. (Unfortunately the article is in German, but it does have 19 nice photographs of the Do X.) Epsiloner ( talk) 13:49, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Both airplanes were lemons.
Mark Lincoln (
talk)
10:36, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
The R6O also tested JATO takeoffs with six rockets mounted on the rear of the fuselage. I saw a video on Youtube where the rockets were mounted in the wings. Vgy7ujm ( talk) 03:04, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
Is this aircraft not very similar to the Boeing Stratocruiser ? It seems curious to me that it is not not included on the list of comparable aircraft. Eregli bob ( talk) 09:44, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
Mark Lincoln ( talk) 10:34, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lockheed R6V Constitution. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 15:37, 2 July 2016 (UTC)