This article is within the scope of the
Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of
open tasks and
task forces. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
The 2018 interim bomber will compliment the B-2 and other current bombers. The FB-22's range is only like 1/4 of the B-2 and other current heavy bombers. The interim bomber will replace the F-117, I guess. The F-35 will cover some of that too. The F-117 has missiles as well. -
Fnlayson17:17, 10 November 2007 (UTC)reply
I think the reason it hasn't been renamed that before is that Boeing is the primary proponent of the variant, and would probably be the lead contractor/manufacturer if it were to be produced. -
BilCat (
talk)
21:35, 6 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Thanks, that's a good one. I have not yet run across anything on Boeing involvement with the FB-22. Other than with the F-22, I've only seen mention of a Boeing-LM partnership for the subsonic
New Generation Bomber. -
Fnlayson (
talk)
23:08, 6 September 2009 (UTC)reply
No problem, BR. I looked in the article,and there's no mention of Boeing in it that I could find anyway. I'll see what I can dig up this week, and we'll go from there. -
BilCat (
talk)
04:32, 5 April 2010 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of the
Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of
open tasks and
task forces. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
The 2018 interim bomber will compliment the B-2 and other current bombers. The FB-22's range is only like 1/4 of the B-2 and other current heavy bombers. The interim bomber will replace the F-117, I guess. The F-35 will cover some of that too. The F-117 has missiles as well. -
Fnlayson17:17, 10 November 2007 (UTC)reply
I think the reason it hasn't been renamed that before is that Boeing is the primary proponent of the variant, and would probably be the lead contractor/manufacturer if it were to be produced. -
BilCat (
talk)
21:35, 6 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Thanks, that's a good one. I have not yet run across anything on Boeing involvement with the FB-22. Other than with the F-22, I've only seen mention of a Boeing-LM partnership for the subsonic
New Generation Bomber. -
Fnlayson (
talk)
23:08, 6 September 2009 (UTC)reply
No problem, BR. I looked in the article,and there's no mention of Boeing in it that I could find anyway. I'll see what I can dig up this week, and we'll go from there. -
BilCat (
talk)
04:32, 5 April 2010 (UTC)reply