Localisation (humanitarian practice) was nominated as a Social sciences and society good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (October 20, 2022). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
The contents of the Talk:Interrogating the evidence base on humanitarian localisation page were merged into Localisation (humanitarian practice) on 18 February 2022. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Following the AfD of Interrogating the evidence base on humanitarian localisation, which resulted in a consensus to merge it into here, I've done the merger, I hope correctly. This is my first merger. So wasn't sure about the following:
I don't see any of these issues as crises or urgent, but a second option from someone more experienced would be welcome. CT55555 ( talk) 01:00, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
Since localisation is a British spelling, I am wondering if we should place the {{ EngvarB}} or {{ Use British English}} templates into this article. Please see MOS:ENGVAR for the Manual of Style guidance on this.
Similarly, we should also decide which {{ Use dmy dates}} / {{ Use mdy dates}} template to place. If we are using EngvarB or British English, we should use the first date template.
I am not looking for a lengthy discussion, just the concurrence of a couple of other editors on this matter. Peaceray ( talk) 23:49, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
I am done for now. Do you think you can add a short, terse description for the Wikidata item at wikidata:Q110529247? Peaceray ( talk) 00:39, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
the practice of empowering, funding, and resourcing aid organisations local to an emergency. Peaceray ( talk) 04:22, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: David Fuchs ( talk · contribs) 19:13, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
In progress.
Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs
talk
19:13, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
The main issue I see with this article is criteria 1, 2, and 3.
Given the systemic problems I see with the article at present, I am failing the nomination. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 21:04, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Localisation (humanitarian practice) was nominated as a Social sciences and society good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (October 20, 2022). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
The contents of the Talk:Interrogating the evidence base on humanitarian localisation page were merged into Localisation (humanitarian practice) on 18 February 2022. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Following the AfD of Interrogating the evidence base on humanitarian localisation, which resulted in a consensus to merge it into here, I've done the merger, I hope correctly. This is my first merger. So wasn't sure about the following:
I don't see any of these issues as crises or urgent, but a second option from someone more experienced would be welcome. CT55555 ( talk) 01:00, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
Since localisation is a British spelling, I am wondering if we should place the {{ EngvarB}} or {{ Use British English}} templates into this article. Please see MOS:ENGVAR for the Manual of Style guidance on this.
Similarly, we should also decide which {{ Use dmy dates}} / {{ Use mdy dates}} template to place. If we are using EngvarB or British English, we should use the first date template.
I am not looking for a lengthy discussion, just the concurrence of a couple of other editors on this matter. Peaceray ( talk) 23:49, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
I am done for now. Do you think you can add a short, terse description for the Wikidata item at wikidata:Q110529247? Peaceray ( talk) 00:39, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
the practice of empowering, funding, and resourcing aid organisations local to an emergency. Peaceray ( talk) 04:22, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: David Fuchs ( talk · contribs) 19:13, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
In progress.
Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs
talk
19:13, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
The main issue I see with this article is criteria 1, 2, and 3.
Given the systemic problems I see with the article at present, I am failing the nomination. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 21:04, 20 October 2022 (UTC)