This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
Latin music (music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and the languages of Ibero-America, see project scope for more details) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin musicWikipedia:WikiProject Latin musicTemplate:WikiProject Latin musicLatin music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Separate the lead and second sentence into "Lo Mejor de...Selena is a double disc compilation album by American singer Selena. It was released posthumously in the United States on March 31, 2015 by EMI Latin and Universal Music Latin Entertainment."
I think the tense of the second to last sentence should be the same as the rest of the article; perhaps you could say "The album has charted on the Top..." instead?
It doesn't sound right, it could be me though but it would then read "The album has charted on the U.S. Billboard Top Latin Albums and Latin Pop Albums chart at number two".
jona(talk) 00:32, 24 March 2016 (UTC)reply
The final sentence isn't necessary because it doesn't really describe the article as a whole
Find a source stating that "Como la Flor" is Selena's signature song
The last two sentences at the period verifies this statement.
jona(talk) 00:32, 24 March 2016 (UTC)reply
The fourth sentence contains a total of six references; that's quite a lot; I think you can make the same point with less citations
The acclaim needs to have more than one reference as one source does not explicitly state it was received well, the popular culture reference needs to be proven by multiple sources since not one explicitly state there was an error on their chart reference, and Billboard's reference would need to verify that popular culture has been wrong and in fact the single only peaked at number six.
jona(talk) 00:32, 24 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Paragraph 2
This paragraph is quite good; I have nothing to add to this section
Critical reception
This section doesn't mention any critic reviews or critical opinions; this section should be renamed "Commercial reception" or "Commercial performance"
Since this section no longer has a critical reception section, it definitely needs one; this is major for a GA album
It's a 'best of' album with no promotion or singles so reviews would be hard to find, but I did found a few that discussed briefly on it though nothing major would ever be found since nothing new came out of this album.
jona(talk) 00:32, 24 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Shouldn't Selena be credited as 'Quintanilla' on the tracks instead of 'Selena'?
Her siblings are named Quintanilla, her brother wrote the majority of her songs so it would be confusing to see Quintanilla, Quintanilla, Veda.
jona(talk) 00:32, 24 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Add total time to the track listing for disc two as well
[22] - Remove the link to AllMusic; needs an access date and an author (depends on how the source is used)
I used the
Template:Allmusic which does not allow me alter anything since it was only to source the writing credits and no review was posted.
jona(talk) 00:32, 24 March 2016 (UTC)reply
A very good article, but it definitely needs some work before passing. A critical reception section is necessary before passing. I'm allowing the nominator to make changes before passing. Thank you.
Carbrera (
talk) 23:35, 22 March 2016 (UTC)reply
@
AJona1992: Very, very good! Just one thing away from passing, can you change "has been" to "was" under the commercial section? Then I will gladly pass it! :)
Carbrera (
talk) 01:35, 24 March 2016 (UTC)reply
The awards ceremony hasn't aired yet (April 28, 2016) so that's why I wrote "has been" instead of "was" since the outcome has not been determined. Best,
jona(talk) 01:39, 24 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Oh, duh. I should have figured. Down the road, please change it to 'was' after the airing. Thanks! It was nice working with you!
Carbrera (
talk) 01:40, 24 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Of course, and thanks so much for your review! All the best,
jona(talk) 01:43, 24 March 2016 (UTC)reply
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
Lo Mejor de...Selena. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
Latin music (music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and the languages of Ibero-America, see project scope for more details) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin musicWikipedia:WikiProject Latin musicTemplate:WikiProject Latin musicLatin music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Separate the lead and second sentence into "Lo Mejor de...Selena is a double disc compilation album by American singer Selena. It was released posthumously in the United States on March 31, 2015 by EMI Latin and Universal Music Latin Entertainment."
I think the tense of the second to last sentence should be the same as the rest of the article; perhaps you could say "The album has charted on the Top..." instead?
It doesn't sound right, it could be me though but it would then read "The album has charted on the U.S. Billboard Top Latin Albums and Latin Pop Albums chart at number two".
jona(talk) 00:32, 24 March 2016 (UTC)reply
The final sentence isn't necessary because it doesn't really describe the article as a whole
Find a source stating that "Como la Flor" is Selena's signature song
The last two sentences at the period verifies this statement.
jona(talk) 00:32, 24 March 2016 (UTC)reply
The fourth sentence contains a total of six references; that's quite a lot; I think you can make the same point with less citations
The acclaim needs to have more than one reference as one source does not explicitly state it was received well, the popular culture reference needs to be proven by multiple sources since not one explicitly state there was an error on their chart reference, and Billboard's reference would need to verify that popular culture has been wrong and in fact the single only peaked at number six.
jona(talk) 00:32, 24 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Paragraph 2
This paragraph is quite good; I have nothing to add to this section
Critical reception
This section doesn't mention any critic reviews or critical opinions; this section should be renamed "Commercial reception" or "Commercial performance"
Since this section no longer has a critical reception section, it definitely needs one; this is major for a GA album
It's a 'best of' album with no promotion or singles so reviews would be hard to find, but I did found a few that discussed briefly on it though nothing major would ever be found since nothing new came out of this album.
jona(talk) 00:32, 24 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Shouldn't Selena be credited as 'Quintanilla' on the tracks instead of 'Selena'?
Her siblings are named Quintanilla, her brother wrote the majority of her songs so it would be confusing to see Quintanilla, Quintanilla, Veda.
jona(talk) 00:32, 24 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Add total time to the track listing for disc two as well
[22] - Remove the link to AllMusic; needs an access date and an author (depends on how the source is used)
I used the
Template:Allmusic which does not allow me alter anything since it was only to source the writing credits and no review was posted.
jona(talk) 00:32, 24 March 2016 (UTC)reply
A very good article, but it definitely needs some work before passing. A critical reception section is necessary before passing. I'm allowing the nominator to make changes before passing. Thank you.
Carbrera (
talk) 23:35, 22 March 2016 (UTC)reply
@
AJona1992: Very, very good! Just one thing away from passing, can you change "has been" to "was" under the commercial section? Then I will gladly pass it! :)
Carbrera (
talk) 01:35, 24 March 2016 (UTC)reply
The awards ceremony hasn't aired yet (April 28, 2016) so that's why I wrote "has been" instead of "was" since the outcome has not been determined. Best,
jona(talk) 01:39, 24 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Oh, duh. I should have figured. Down the road, please change it to 'was' after the airing. Thanks! It was nice working with you!
Carbrera (
talk) 01:40, 24 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Of course, and thanks so much for your review! All the best,
jona(talk) 01:43, 24 March 2016 (UTC)reply
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
Lo Mejor de...Selena. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.