GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Larry Hockett ( talk · contribs) 22:34, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
I'll be happy to review this nomination. I will have more specific feedback shortly, but at a glance I am concerned that some of the November 2006 GA review feedback hasn't been implemented. GA reviews were somewhat different back then (it looks like the review was provided on the article talk page rather than on a dedicated GA review page), but there are a number of good suggestions there on items like grammar and punctuation (examples: no italics in Third World Coalition, missing article in "of Greek system", and unnecessary article in "the UCLA's administration"). I don't think it's necessary to quick fail this nomination, even if it could be justified under WP:GAFAIL #5. However, moving forward I would expect the nominator to address the review feedback quickly so that we can work through some longstanding problems. Larry Hockett ( Talk) 22:34, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Thanks to the nominator for the work that has gone into this entry already. More feedback to come. Larry Hockett ( Talk) 23:01, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
To be continued. Larry Hockett ( Talk) 00:33, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
There is a lot of work to do here. The biggest issue is that, in several places, the sources don't support the content in our article. Once we rewrite some of these sentences to address this issue, that could bring up more work. I have noted close paraphrasing in at least one section, but I won't exhaustively search for that problem until we fix the issues above.
The GA process is intended to take about seven days, but that isn't a hard-and-fast rule. Let me know if you would rather close the nomination and work on this at your leisure before renominating it. Larry Hockett ( Talk) 01:55, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
I'm closing this nomination, as we are about ten days into the review with no response to the feedback. It can be nominated again once an editor is willing to address the feedback. Larry Hockett ( Talk) 09:51, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Larry Hockett ( talk · contribs) 22:34, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
I'll be happy to review this nomination. I will have more specific feedback shortly, but at a glance I am concerned that some of the November 2006 GA review feedback hasn't been implemented. GA reviews were somewhat different back then (it looks like the review was provided on the article talk page rather than on a dedicated GA review page), but there are a number of good suggestions there on items like grammar and punctuation (examples: no italics in Third World Coalition, missing article in "of Greek system", and unnecessary article in "the UCLA's administration"). I don't think it's necessary to quick fail this nomination, even if it could be justified under WP:GAFAIL #5. However, moving forward I would expect the nominator to address the review feedback quickly so that we can work through some longstanding problems. Larry Hockett ( Talk) 22:34, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Thanks to the nominator for the work that has gone into this entry already. More feedback to come. Larry Hockett ( Talk) 23:01, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
To be continued. Larry Hockett ( Talk) 00:33, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
There is a lot of work to do here. The biggest issue is that, in several places, the sources don't support the content in our article. Once we rewrite some of these sentences to address this issue, that could bring up more work. I have noted close paraphrasing in at least one section, but I won't exhaustively search for that problem until we fix the issues above.
The GA process is intended to take about seven days, but that isn't a hard-and-fast rule. Let me know if you would rather close the nomination and work on this at your leisure before renominating it. Larry Hockett ( Talk) 01:55, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
I'm closing this nomination, as we are about ten days into the review with no response to the feedback. It can be nominated again once an editor is willing to address the feedback. Larry Hockett ( Talk) 09:51, 27 February 2021 (UTC)