Lloyd Monserratt was a History good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Should really check to see whether this article meets B standards first. Good luck trying to improve this article to eventually achieve GA. Cydperez 21:55, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
-- evrik 22:45, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Suggestions for cleaning up this page? evrik 16:23, 9 September 2005
In 2001 Monserratt was involved in a controversial telephone campaign against mayoral candidate Antonio Villaraigosa wherein a woman impersonated Gloria Molina. District Attorney Steve Cooley investigated the incident and concluded that no laws were broken.
In 2001, Monserratt was involved in a controversial telephone campaign against mayoral candidate Antonio Villaraigosa wherein an individual impersonated Gloria Molina. After looking into the incident District Attorney Steve Cooley, though critical of the campaign tactic, concluded that no laws had been broken.
I removed these unsourced lines. Monserratt was nver charged with any crime and was exonerated of any wrong-doing. A more NPOV insertion with sources may be appropriate, but not this one. -- evrik 01:57, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
This text was attributed to this article
As reported in LA Weekly (5/30/2001), Monserratt admitted to District Attorney Steve Cooley his involvement in a controversial telephone campaign wherein someone impersonating Gloria Molina disparaged the voting record of mayoral candidate Antonio Villaraigosa. Though critical of the tactic, Cooley concluded that no laws had been broken.
How about a more neutral paragraph. -- evrik 19:36, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
How about this:
Monserratt was involved in local Los Angeles politics. In 2001, while on leave from Pacheco’s office to run the campaign of Ed Reyes for 1st District seat of the city council, Monserratt was involved in a small campaign scandal. Monserratt ran the phone-bank computers contracted to the mayoral campaign of Xavier Becerra. The campaign ran a tape of someone impersonating Gloria Molina disparaging the voting record of mayoral candidate Antonio Villaraigosa. Though no laws had been broken, this action tarnished the reputations of all involved.Haefele, Mark (2001-05-30). "The New Alignment". LA Weekly.
-- evrik 20:14, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
This article is POV and OR and barely makes the grade as a Start Class article. Please do not alter ratings without detailed analysis and justification. Without supplying sources to many flamboyant statements the page is certainly a candidate for afD. Anlace 14:42, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
This article will require major revision and expansion before qualifying for GA status. Best of luck and feel free to contact me if you have any questions.
thadius856
talk 07:52, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Here are some more references that can be folded into the article:
-- evrik ( talk) 21:34, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
I removed this citation because it was repetitive: "State Scorecard". Time Magazine. November 1996. Archived from the original on 2004-02-06. Retrieved 2004-02-06. -- evrik ( talk) 01:38, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Some more references:
-- evrik ( talk) 02:48, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Lloyd Monserratt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:11, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Larry Hockett ( talk · contribs) 22:34, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
I'll be happy to review this nomination. I will have more specific feedback shortly, but at a glance I am concerned that some of the November 2006 GA review feedback hasn't been implemented. GA reviews were somewhat different back then (it looks like the review was provided on the article talk page rather than on a dedicated GA review page), but there are a number of good suggestions there on items like grammar and punctuation (examples: no italics in Third World Coalition, missing article in "of Greek system", and unnecessary article in "the UCLA's administration"). I don't think it's necessary to quick fail this nomination, even if it could be justified under WP:GAFAIL #5. However, moving forward I would expect the nominator to address the review feedback quickly so that we can work through some longstanding problems. Larry Hockett ( Talk) 22:34, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Thanks to the nominator for the work that has gone into this entry already. More feedback to come. Larry Hockett ( Talk) 23:01, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
To be continued. Larry Hockett ( Talk) 00:33, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
There is a lot of work to do here. The biggest issue is that, in several places, the sources don't support the content in our article. Once we rewrite some of these sentences to address this issue, that could bring up more work. I have noted close paraphrasing in at least one section, but I won't exhaustively search for that problem until we fix the issues above.
The GA process is intended to take about seven days, but that isn't a hard-and-fast rule. Let me know if you would rather close the nomination and work on this at your leisure before renominating it. Larry Hockett ( Talk) 01:55, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
I'm closing this nomination, as we are about ten days into the review with no response to the feedback. It can be nominated again once an editor is willing to address the feedback. Larry Hockett ( Talk) 09:51, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Lloyd Monserratt was a History good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Should really check to see whether this article meets B standards first. Good luck trying to improve this article to eventually achieve GA. Cydperez 21:55, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
-- evrik 22:45, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Suggestions for cleaning up this page? evrik 16:23, 9 September 2005
In 2001 Monserratt was involved in a controversial telephone campaign against mayoral candidate Antonio Villaraigosa wherein a woman impersonated Gloria Molina. District Attorney Steve Cooley investigated the incident and concluded that no laws were broken.
In 2001, Monserratt was involved in a controversial telephone campaign against mayoral candidate Antonio Villaraigosa wherein an individual impersonated Gloria Molina. After looking into the incident District Attorney Steve Cooley, though critical of the campaign tactic, concluded that no laws had been broken.
I removed these unsourced lines. Monserratt was nver charged with any crime and was exonerated of any wrong-doing. A more NPOV insertion with sources may be appropriate, but not this one. -- evrik 01:57, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
This text was attributed to this article
As reported in LA Weekly (5/30/2001), Monserratt admitted to District Attorney Steve Cooley his involvement in a controversial telephone campaign wherein someone impersonating Gloria Molina disparaged the voting record of mayoral candidate Antonio Villaraigosa. Though critical of the tactic, Cooley concluded that no laws had been broken.
How about a more neutral paragraph. -- evrik 19:36, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
How about this:
Monserratt was involved in local Los Angeles politics. In 2001, while on leave from Pacheco’s office to run the campaign of Ed Reyes for 1st District seat of the city council, Monserratt was involved in a small campaign scandal. Monserratt ran the phone-bank computers contracted to the mayoral campaign of Xavier Becerra. The campaign ran a tape of someone impersonating Gloria Molina disparaging the voting record of mayoral candidate Antonio Villaraigosa. Though no laws had been broken, this action tarnished the reputations of all involved.Haefele, Mark (2001-05-30). "The New Alignment". LA Weekly.
-- evrik 20:14, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
This article is POV and OR and barely makes the grade as a Start Class article. Please do not alter ratings without detailed analysis and justification. Without supplying sources to many flamboyant statements the page is certainly a candidate for afD. Anlace 14:42, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
This article will require major revision and expansion before qualifying for GA status. Best of luck and feel free to contact me if you have any questions.
thadius856
talk 07:52, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Here are some more references that can be folded into the article:
-- evrik ( talk) 21:34, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
I removed this citation because it was repetitive: "State Scorecard". Time Magazine. November 1996. Archived from the original on 2004-02-06. Retrieved 2004-02-06. -- evrik ( talk) 01:38, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Some more references:
-- evrik ( talk) 02:48, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Lloyd Monserratt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:11, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Larry Hockett ( talk · contribs) 22:34, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
I'll be happy to review this nomination. I will have more specific feedback shortly, but at a glance I am concerned that some of the November 2006 GA review feedback hasn't been implemented. GA reviews were somewhat different back then (it looks like the review was provided on the article talk page rather than on a dedicated GA review page), but there are a number of good suggestions there on items like grammar and punctuation (examples: no italics in Third World Coalition, missing article in "of Greek system", and unnecessary article in "the UCLA's administration"). I don't think it's necessary to quick fail this nomination, even if it could be justified under WP:GAFAIL #5. However, moving forward I would expect the nominator to address the review feedback quickly so that we can work through some longstanding problems. Larry Hockett ( Talk) 22:34, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Thanks to the nominator for the work that has gone into this entry already. More feedback to come. Larry Hockett ( Talk) 23:01, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
To be continued. Larry Hockett ( Talk) 00:33, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
There is a lot of work to do here. The biggest issue is that, in several places, the sources don't support the content in our article. Once we rewrite some of these sentences to address this issue, that could bring up more work. I have noted close paraphrasing in at least one section, but I won't exhaustively search for that problem until we fix the issues above.
The GA process is intended to take about seven days, but that isn't a hard-and-fast rule. Let me know if you would rather close the nomination and work on this at your leisure before renominating it. Larry Hockett ( Talk) 01:55, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
I'm closing this nomination, as we are about ten days into the review with no response to the feedback. It can be nominated again once an editor is willing to address the feedback. Larry Hockett ( Talk) 09:51, 27 February 2021 (UTC)