![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
In these two edits I removed what I consider to be promotional fluff. The first bit was a sentence fragment that started out in Dec 2014 as "With Forevermore's success, Soberano is now dubbed as the newest Primetime Princess." Grammar issues aside, this is not an appropriate statement to present as a fact and it certainly wouldn't belong in the lead. If she won People Magazine's "Primetime Princess" award, that might be a different story, but we would present that in the context of awards she's won, not as statements of fact. Same deal with the second statement, "Soberano is recognized as The Leading Lady to Watch For". While sources may have said this, it is not a fact, it's an opinion, and serves to promote the individual. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 15:12, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Everybody and their mother gives out awards. That doesn't mean we include them automatically at Wikipedia. See WP:V, which says that verifiability does not guarantee inclusion. If the awards I removed in these edits are notable, then there should presumably be articles on the awards that have withstood the scrutiny of the community. We're not here to fluff up the article's subject with nonsensical awards, so diligence is required. There were also serious concerns about rowspans that were inexplicably removed by Apettyfer. Please see WP:DTT. Tables need to be accessible to visually impaired users who employ screen readers. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 03:35, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
SS1902: Why did you remove Liza's religion from the article even though it's properly sourced? You do realize that a subject's religious views (or lack thereof) may be put in the article as long as it's neither WP:SYNTH nor unsourced? Please explain yourself. Matieszyn talk 02:48, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Liza Soberano. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:35, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 19:51, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 22:29, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 05:23, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 12:52, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
In these two edits I removed what I consider to be promotional fluff. The first bit was a sentence fragment that started out in Dec 2014 as "With Forevermore's success, Soberano is now dubbed as the newest Primetime Princess." Grammar issues aside, this is not an appropriate statement to present as a fact and it certainly wouldn't belong in the lead. If she won People Magazine's "Primetime Princess" award, that might be a different story, but we would present that in the context of awards she's won, not as statements of fact. Same deal with the second statement, "Soberano is recognized as The Leading Lady to Watch For". While sources may have said this, it is not a fact, it's an opinion, and serves to promote the individual. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 15:12, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Everybody and their mother gives out awards. That doesn't mean we include them automatically at Wikipedia. See WP:V, which says that verifiability does not guarantee inclusion. If the awards I removed in these edits are notable, then there should presumably be articles on the awards that have withstood the scrutiny of the community. We're not here to fluff up the article's subject with nonsensical awards, so diligence is required. There were also serious concerns about rowspans that were inexplicably removed by Apettyfer. Please see WP:DTT. Tables need to be accessible to visually impaired users who employ screen readers. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 03:35, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
SS1902: Why did you remove Liza's religion from the article even though it's properly sourced? You do realize that a subject's religious views (or lack thereof) may be put in the article as long as it's neither WP:SYNTH nor unsourced? Please explain yourself. Matieszyn talk 02:48, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Liza Soberano. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:35, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 19:51, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 22:29, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 05:23, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 12:52, 13 January 2022 (UTC)