This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This site has photos and video of Cohen's Bodywork project which aren't available elsewhere on the web. I feel that this provides additional useful information about the project for which the subject is most notable. The site is accessible to the reader , relevant to the content of the article, likely to remain a functional link and the information can't be added to the Wikipedia article directly due to copyright issues, therefore it should be in the External links section. I have no conflict of interest here, I'm not affiliated with the site in any way. I have considered this link on its merits, using the External links guidelines. While I am going to re-add this link because I don't doubt the appropriateness of it, I am explaining my reasoning on the article talkpage to solicit comments from other editors. -- Versa geek 19:54, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
I don't see anything wrong with linking to the page in this article. It's important to distinguish between the relevance of some page to an article and the on-wiki reputation of the page's author. — xDanielx T/ C\ R 06:17, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Well, here is a not brand-new user, and I just restored the link, since it helps Wikipedia readers (that's who we're here for, right?), and since 4 admins think it should stay as a resource versus only 1 non-admin who thinks it should go (and who has a history of contentious editing and tone). -- John Russ Finley ( talk) 18:21, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Is this Liz Cohen person notable enough to merit an encyclopedia entry? It looks to me like her claim to fame is something about taking a Trebant and making it into a Cheverolet. Why would this garner her a Wikipedia page? JettaMann ( talk) 18:35, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This site has photos and video of Cohen's Bodywork project which aren't available elsewhere on the web. I feel that this provides additional useful information about the project for which the subject is most notable. The site is accessible to the reader , relevant to the content of the article, likely to remain a functional link and the information can't be added to the Wikipedia article directly due to copyright issues, therefore it should be in the External links section. I have no conflict of interest here, I'm not affiliated with the site in any way. I have considered this link on its merits, using the External links guidelines. While I am going to re-add this link because I don't doubt the appropriateness of it, I am explaining my reasoning on the article talkpage to solicit comments from other editors. -- Versa geek 19:54, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
I don't see anything wrong with linking to the page in this article. It's important to distinguish between the relevance of some page to an article and the on-wiki reputation of the page's author. — xDanielx T/ C\ R 06:17, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Well, here is a not brand-new user, and I just restored the link, since it helps Wikipedia readers (that's who we're here for, right?), and since 4 admins think it should stay as a resource versus only 1 non-admin who thinks it should go (and who has a history of contentious editing and tone). -- John Russ Finley ( talk) 18:21, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Is this Liz Cohen person notable enough to merit an encyclopedia entry? It looks to me like her claim to fame is something about taking a Trebant and making it into a Cheverolet. Why would this garner her a Wikipedia page? JettaMann ( talk) 18:35, 23 September 2010 (UTC)