This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

China This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Education This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Found https://global.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202008/13/WS5f34facfa310834817260298.html which may be related (China Daily and Sixth Tone should be OK for "cultural" China-specific things) WhisperToMe ( talk) 19:18, 30 August 2020 (UTC) reply

@ Adam J Hruby:

Hi, Adam! According to Wikipedia:GNG:

• "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list."

This means at least two reliable sources. (The existence only, not only citations within the article)

I used one source written in English which is Sixth Tone (in Wikipedia:Perennial sources Sixth Tone is acceptable for Chinese cultural matters)

Source #2 is from a sister publication of Sixth Tone.

Therefore I disagree with the PROD. WhisperToMe ( talk) 20:24, 30 August 2020 (UTC) reply