Are there other sources to support this page? It had been redirected to Living Constitution, which I believe is the most common use of the phrase. I see the one reference linking here [1] which seems to describe a different use in business, but is there anything more on other uses? Otherwise, the redirect seemed to make sense. Mackan79 16:49, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
The article states "see right to privacy," but the right to privacy article says nothing about a living document or living constitution. Why is this reference here? It doesn't contribute to the concept of a living document. Its inclusion here is suspect. -- Trolleyfish ( talk) 04:33, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Two sources, to internet dictionaries no less, for a topic central to corporate and constitutional law? Are you joking? I deleted the entire section dealing with the law specifically on the grounds that it contains not one source yet pontificates freely on topics such as "non-Originalist" interpretations of the US constitution. A topic as dense and scholarly as constitutional law, not to mention a topic that couldn't be more full of credible source material if someone bothered to look, is utterly off-limits when it comes to making un-cited statements in what purports to be an encyclopedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.162.131.192 ( talk) 04:37, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
its not to be confused with the 'living-document' view i have just posted. yes the constitution is a living document, but the idea that it is to be interpreted that way is called the living-document view. much as federalist is to anti-federalist, living document is to bedrock, which i also mentioned here. not enough information to create a page just for those two ideas so i have left them here. thanks --Roy Stanley 07:03, 11 June 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Royissick ( talk • contribs)
Using the US constitution example of 2 schools of thought, Originalism uses the term "Originalist" to refer to a supporter. However we do need a term for a person who supports the living document theory as outlined in this article. It seems that a "living-documentist" is the perfect candidate for this. 203.46.132.214 ( talk) 06:15, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Are there other sources to support this page? It had been redirected to Living Constitution, which I believe is the most common use of the phrase. I see the one reference linking here [1] which seems to describe a different use in business, but is there anything more on other uses? Otherwise, the redirect seemed to make sense. Mackan79 16:49, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
The article states "see right to privacy," but the right to privacy article says nothing about a living document or living constitution. Why is this reference here? It doesn't contribute to the concept of a living document. Its inclusion here is suspect. -- Trolleyfish ( talk) 04:33, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Two sources, to internet dictionaries no less, for a topic central to corporate and constitutional law? Are you joking? I deleted the entire section dealing with the law specifically on the grounds that it contains not one source yet pontificates freely on topics such as "non-Originalist" interpretations of the US constitution. A topic as dense and scholarly as constitutional law, not to mention a topic that couldn't be more full of credible source material if someone bothered to look, is utterly off-limits when it comes to making un-cited statements in what purports to be an encyclopedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.162.131.192 ( talk) 04:37, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
its not to be confused with the 'living-document' view i have just posted. yes the constitution is a living document, but the idea that it is to be interpreted that way is called the living-document view. much as federalist is to anti-federalist, living document is to bedrock, which i also mentioned here. not enough information to create a page just for those two ideas so i have left them here. thanks --Roy Stanley 07:03, 11 June 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Royissick ( talk • contribs)
Using the US constitution example of 2 schools of thought, Originalism uses the term "Originalist" to refer to a supporter. However we do need a term for a person who supports the living document theory as outlined in this article. It seems that a "living-documentist" is the perfect candidate for this. 203.46.132.214 ( talk) 06:15, 29 August 2023 (UTC)