![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 24 May 2008. The result of the discussion was No consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I re-added the warning on the link to the Literotica website. This website is only suitable for adults, as is clearly stated on the site's main page.
I've just taken a few minutes to edit this article, removing a fair amount of POV, eliminating some comments and tightening it up. I'm amazed that an article can go from creation to suddenly being a battleground this quickly. The semiprotection will hopefully help, but still - let's keep it encyclopedic, folks. Tony Fox (arf!) 15:49, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thank you!
This link to the Literotica website has been updated with a warning. This website is only suitable for adults. Genius12 17:54, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
I was looking at this originally as a vanity/spam page, and got my signals crossed in looking up things like the site's Alexa ranking. It's MUCH higher than I thought it was, at 611. Plus the 800,000 or so links on Google or if you use "link:" on AltaVista you still get 35,000. So I was utterly in error for suggesting this article should get deleted, when it really should just be expanded and properly referenced. My apologies to anyone who's spent time working on it. -- JohnDBuell 04:46, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
I have added it as a link to amateur pornography as some of the sites for sex stories. Pornhistorian ( talk) 20:42, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
The comment
After a long period of instability, including frequent wholesale "boots" of logged-in users, this client is now dependable
really doesn't reflect the reality of LitChat. Mass "boots" are still very common. I'm going to remove that section. I know this is close to WP:OR, but so is the statement I'm removing.
Less than 20, 15, likely several minutes ago. 108.161.114.218 ( talk) 20:32, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Literotica. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:49, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 24 May 2008. The result of the discussion was No consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I re-added the warning on the link to the Literotica website. This website is only suitable for adults, as is clearly stated on the site's main page.
I've just taken a few minutes to edit this article, removing a fair amount of POV, eliminating some comments and tightening it up. I'm amazed that an article can go from creation to suddenly being a battleground this quickly. The semiprotection will hopefully help, but still - let's keep it encyclopedic, folks. Tony Fox (arf!) 15:49, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thank you!
This link to the Literotica website has been updated with a warning. This website is only suitable for adults. Genius12 17:54, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
I was looking at this originally as a vanity/spam page, and got my signals crossed in looking up things like the site's Alexa ranking. It's MUCH higher than I thought it was, at 611. Plus the 800,000 or so links on Google or if you use "link:" on AltaVista you still get 35,000. So I was utterly in error for suggesting this article should get deleted, when it really should just be expanded and properly referenced. My apologies to anyone who's spent time working on it. -- JohnDBuell 04:46, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
I have added it as a link to amateur pornography as some of the sites for sex stories. Pornhistorian ( talk) 20:42, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
The comment
After a long period of instability, including frequent wholesale "boots" of logged-in users, this client is now dependable
really doesn't reflect the reality of LitChat. Mass "boots" are still very common. I'm going to remove that section. I know this is close to WP:OR, but so is the statement I'm removing.
Less than 20, 15, likely several minutes ago. 108.161.114.218 ( talk) 20:32, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Literotica. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:49, 3 January 2018 (UTC)