This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Available pictures on Commons Category:Listenbourg. -- Tukp ( talk) 05:31, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Due to its sensible content, this article may require special maintenance.
@
DarkAudit: I reverted
this disruptive edit, while
the same IP vandalized at the same minute. Why did you restore
the wrong version? Thanks
Belbury,
for the
last update. Also pinging @
Teiladnam: --
Tukp (
talk)
09:37, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
Dear InterestGather, thanks for your interest in collaborating on this article. You're fighting against original researches, excellent. Your help is welcome here. But please, first take a look at the previous discussions, and also check the article history, before making controversial changes. This edit and the other ones you reverted aim to comply with {{ Tone}}. What else do you propose? La Libre is a major daily newspaper in Belgium. Why would its content be unreliable? Read also the section Reliable sources on this page. We're far from WP:OR and there's a warning on WP:Huggle: "You take full responsibility for any action you perform using Huggle", so please use this tool carefully. If the algorithm detects a suspicious contribution, it doesn't mean that the suggestion is always right. You must verify first, and possibly discuss. -- Tukp ( talk) 09:46, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
You can add site http://listenbourg.com 185.171.202.178 ( talk) 21:56, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
The article is currently visited 542 times a day. This performance is higher than many other fictional countries and famous internet memes. Current events or influences from outside Wikipedia, probably. -- Tukp ( talk) 03:46, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
After one month this daily average has slightly increased, reaching 585 visits now. Probably the best way to enlighten readers about a misleading concept. -- Tukp ( talk) 01:30, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Why is this an article ? Mistyhands ( talk) 17:46, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
This article is currently using reliable sources to support its content. Verify for example NBC News, The Times, The New Zealand Herald and CNN have been validated by consensus. In foreign languages, Le Figaro, Television Française 1, France Info (TV channel), The Portugal News are all major daily newspapers or TV channels. A few other sources in English like Evening Standard or Insider are in yellow, which means they're not forbidden and " may be usable depending on context". If a particular source seems questionable to someone, the discussions are of course open. But for now, there is no "fake news" inserted in the description of this fiction. In line with WP:HOAX, we're contributing to an encyclopedic project. -- Tukp ( talk) 09:29, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi everyone, I would like to improve the article's style. And concurrently, declutter the header by removing the template {{ Tone}}.
The users Mucube and JesseRafe have already provided some help in phrasing, recently. And I think the writing could adopt more encyclopedic codes in the second and third sections ( Viral spread and Responses). Thus I'm going to try to ameliorate the wording. Please feel free to perfect these modifications, and to bring your own input, according to your expectations. Thanks. -- Tukp ( talk) 04:03, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Any coverage about how this prank was actually receieved by its intended audience — in the U.S., and by the most “affected” local populations northwestern Spain and Portugal? Tuvalkin ( talk) 01:06, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Je veux mettre à jour la démographie du pays approuvée par le Président. Lemurien321 ( talk) 22:24, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Available pictures on Commons Category:Listenbourg. -- Tukp ( talk) 05:31, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Due to its sensible content, this article may require special maintenance.
@
DarkAudit: I reverted
this disruptive edit, while
the same IP vandalized at the same minute. Why did you restore
the wrong version? Thanks
Belbury,
for the
last update. Also pinging @
Teiladnam: --
Tukp (
talk)
09:37, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
Dear InterestGather, thanks for your interest in collaborating on this article. You're fighting against original researches, excellent. Your help is welcome here. But please, first take a look at the previous discussions, and also check the article history, before making controversial changes. This edit and the other ones you reverted aim to comply with {{ Tone}}. What else do you propose? La Libre is a major daily newspaper in Belgium. Why would its content be unreliable? Read also the section Reliable sources on this page. We're far from WP:OR and there's a warning on WP:Huggle: "You take full responsibility for any action you perform using Huggle", so please use this tool carefully. If the algorithm detects a suspicious contribution, it doesn't mean that the suggestion is always right. You must verify first, and possibly discuss. -- Tukp ( talk) 09:46, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
You can add site http://listenbourg.com 185.171.202.178 ( talk) 21:56, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
The article is currently visited 542 times a day. This performance is higher than many other fictional countries and famous internet memes. Current events or influences from outside Wikipedia, probably. -- Tukp ( talk) 03:46, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
After one month this daily average has slightly increased, reaching 585 visits now. Probably the best way to enlighten readers about a misleading concept. -- Tukp ( talk) 01:30, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Why is this an article ? Mistyhands ( talk) 17:46, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
This article is currently using reliable sources to support its content. Verify for example NBC News, The Times, The New Zealand Herald and CNN have been validated by consensus. In foreign languages, Le Figaro, Television Française 1, France Info (TV channel), The Portugal News are all major daily newspapers or TV channels. A few other sources in English like Evening Standard or Insider are in yellow, which means they're not forbidden and " may be usable depending on context". If a particular source seems questionable to someone, the discussions are of course open. But for now, there is no "fake news" inserted in the description of this fiction. In line with WP:HOAX, we're contributing to an encyclopedic project. -- Tukp ( talk) 09:29, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi everyone, I would like to improve the article's style. And concurrently, declutter the header by removing the template {{ Tone}}.
The users Mucube and JesseRafe have already provided some help in phrasing, recently. And I think the writing could adopt more encyclopedic codes in the second and third sections ( Viral spread and Responses). Thus I'm going to try to ameliorate the wording. Please feel free to perfect these modifications, and to bring your own input, according to your expectations. Thanks. -- Tukp ( talk) 04:03, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Any coverage about how this prank was actually receieved by its intended audience — in the U.S., and by the most “affected” local populations northwestern Spain and Portugal? Tuvalkin ( talk) 01:06, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Je veux mettre à jour la démographie du pays approuvée par le Président. Lemurien321 ( talk) 22:24, 5 July 2024 (UTC)