This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
List of works by Leonardo da Vinci article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
1Auto-archiving period: 365 days
![]() |
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This picture is listed as "Traditionally Accepted", which is a different classsification of Universally/Widely/Generally Accepted at the top of the section. Is this a mistake or intentional (i.e. do we need to add a 4th classification to the top of the section)? 78.18.254.195 ( talk) 23:33, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
This painting was in the "disputed works", section but when it sold for $450m in 2017, an editor decided it was now accepted. However, times have moved on and in November 2021, the Spanish Prado museum downgraded it to "partial" in their major respective cagalog (which took 5 years, and involved the Louve and other museums, to write). [1] [2] In the 2021 documentary The Lost Leonardo, da Vinci expert Frank Zöllner said: "You have the old parts of the painting which are original—these are by pupils—and the new parts of the painting, which look like Leonardo, but they are by the restorer. In some part, it's a masterpiece by Dianne Modestini". [3] In 2022, the Encyclopædia Britannica records that "no official record of the painting's attribution officially exists". [4]
I think we should move this painting back to "disputed works" and with a highlight that it is considered a "Supposedly collaborative work". 78.18.10.8 ( talk) 01:00, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
References
78.18.10.8 ( talk) 01:00, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
List of works by Leonardo da Vinci article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
1Auto-archiving period: 365 days
![]() |
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This picture is listed as "Traditionally Accepted", which is a different classsification of Universally/Widely/Generally Accepted at the top of the section. Is this a mistake or intentional (i.e. do we need to add a 4th classification to the top of the section)? 78.18.254.195 ( talk) 23:33, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
This painting was in the "disputed works", section but when it sold for $450m in 2017, an editor decided it was now accepted. However, times have moved on and in November 2021, the Spanish Prado museum downgraded it to "partial" in their major respective cagalog (which took 5 years, and involved the Louve and other museums, to write). [1] [2] In the 2021 documentary The Lost Leonardo, da Vinci expert Frank Zöllner said: "You have the old parts of the painting which are original—these are by pupils—and the new parts of the painting, which look like Leonardo, but they are by the restorer. In some part, it's a masterpiece by Dianne Modestini". [3] In 2022, the Encyclopædia Britannica records that "no official record of the painting's attribution officially exists". [4]
I think we should move this painting back to "disputed works" and with a highlight that it is considered a "Supposedly collaborative work". 78.18.10.8 ( talk) 01:00, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
References
78.18.10.8 ( talk) 01:00, 14 November 2022 (UTC)