This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Lists Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Musical Instruments Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Musical Instruments, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of musical instruments on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Musical InstrumentsWikipedia:WikiProject Musical InstrumentsTemplate:WikiProject Musical Instrumentsmusical instruments articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Is it really useful to have this page in addition to List of musical instruments by Hornbostel-Sachs number? Granted "woodwinds" do not appear as a single category in Hornbostel-Sachs (instead there are "flutes", and "reed instruments"), and the Hornbostel-Sachs names can be confusing (e.g. they use "clarinets" to mean single reed instruments, so a saxophone is categorized as a "clarinet, conical bore". Still, maintaining but thr laiydhg both that list and this seems a duplication of effort. -- Rsholmes 02:54, 21 August 2006 (UTC) reply

Free reed aerophone instruments are not added like harmonica —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.232.198.8 ( talk) 23:23, 12 November 2008 (UTC) reply

Can we not get pictures up here for everything. One stop shop to see all of them comparatively?-- Inayity ( talk) 16:46, 14 July 2013 (UTC) reply