![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | List of vetos exercised by the US government in the UN Security Council was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 30 November 2016 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into List of vetoed United Nations Security Council resolutions. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
The result of the move request was: Speedy moved as uncontroversial. I also lowercased "resolution" because it is not a proper noun when used in plural. No such user ( talk) 11:49, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
List of vetoed United Nation Security Council Resolutions → List of vetoed United Nations Security Council Resolutions – The naming convention for the UN is United Nations, so this spelling makes more sense Kuilin ( talk) 07:29, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing— the merger discussion—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. 187.104.24.185 ( talk) 10:48, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: NOT MOVED The nom appears a bit nonsensical to me. ( non-admin closure) Galobtter ( pingó mió) 05:31, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
List of vetoed United Nations Security Council resolutions → [[:]] – This article is partial only to cite 100% all Russian and Chinese vetoes, with most of the vetoes appearing in this article being from Russia voting alone or with China, so it would be appropriate to reform the article for the new title or divide It. 2804:14C:5BB5:8FFF:690D:B0E8:B81:CB55 ( talk) 13:06, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
*'''Support'''
or *'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with ~~~~
. Since
polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account
Wikipedia's policy on article titles.I would have expected the criteria for inclusion on this list to be...
But either some such cases have been omitted in error, or some more restrictive criteria are being used; in the latter case, what is it?
The wiki table has source Dag Hammarskjöld Library which in turn has source document A/58/47, Annex III Part I "Part 1 Draft resources [ sic] not adopted owing to the negative vote of a permanent member". However:
jnestorius( talk) 13:57, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
Many of the "Application for Membership" resolutions held on the same day and had the same meeting record were separated into different entries on the list. Clutter should be reduced on an encyclopedia like Wikipedia. If one wants to see a complete list of all the vetoed resolutions, they could just visit the UN page at https://research.un.org/en/docs/sc/quick (which much of this page seems to be copied from). Xenoriole ( talk) 22:00, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Entry for 22 March 2024 S/2024/239 is broken. 72.50.214.194 ( talk) 23:29, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | List of vetos exercised by the US government in the UN Security Council was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 30 November 2016 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into List of vetoed United Nations Security Council resolutions. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
The result of the move request was: Speedy moved as uncontroversial. I also lowercased "resolution" because it is not a proper noun when used in plural. No such user ( talk) 11:49, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
List of vetoed United Nation Security Council Resolutions → List of vetoed United Nations Security Council Resolutions – The naming convention for the UN is United Nations, so this spelling makes more sense Kuilin ( talk) 07:29, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing— the merger discussion—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. 187.104.24.185 ( talk) 10:48, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: NOT MOVED The nom appears a bit nonsensical to me. ( non-admin closure) Galobtter ( pingó mió) 05:31, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
List of vetoed United Nations Security Council resolutions → [[:]] – This article is partial only to cite 100% all Russian and Chinese vetoes, with most of the vetoes appearing in this article being from Russia voting alone or with China, so it would be appropriate to reform the article for the new title or divide It. 2804:14C:5BB5:8FFF:690D:B0E8:B81:CB55 ( talk) 13:06, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
*'''Support'''
or *'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with ~~~~
. Since
polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account
Wikipedia's policy on article titles.I would have expected the criteria for inclusion on this list to be...
But either some such cases have been omitted in error, or some more restrictive criteria are being used; in the latter case, what is it?
The wiki table has source Dag Hammarskjöld Library which in turn has source document A/58/47, Annex III Part I "Part 1 Draft resources [ sic] not adopted owing to the negative vote of a permanent member". However:
jnestorius( talk) 13:57, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
Many of the "Application for Membership" resolutions held on the same day and had the same meeting record were separated into different entries on the list. Clutter should be reduced on an encyclopedia like Wikipedia. If one wants to see a complete list of all the vetoed resolutions, they could just visit the UN page at https://research.un.org/en/docs/sc/quick (which much of this page seems to be copied from). Xenoriole ( talk) 22:00, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Entry for 22 March 2024 S/2024/239 is broken. 72.50.214.194 ( talk) 23:29, 22 March 2024 (UTC)