While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | To be included on this
stand-alone list, each entry should meet the following
list criteria (
see discussion):
|
![]() | The contents of the List of terrorist incidents in March 2016 page were merged into List of terrorist incidents in 2016 on 31 July 2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
![]() | The contents of the List of terrorist incidents in May 2016 page were merged into List of terrorist incidents in 2016 on 31 July 2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
![]() | The contents of the List of terrorist incidents in September 2016 page were merged into List of terrorist incidents in 2016 on 31 July 2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
I dispute the inclusion of the alleged stabbing on the 17 January in Palestine, described as a "Melee attack". One unidentified person stabbed another unidentified civilian. No terrorist organisation claimed to be responsible. How does that equate to terrorism? Why not just crime? AusLondonder ( talk) 08:30, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
@ Rossbawse: @ 84.101.141.18: @ 92.134.228.44: @ Kristijh:
I think I should note the format I use for the description which is used in over half of the incidents in the article. So in order to have a consistant list, I think you should adopt this format. If you think you can improve it, feel free to offer.
Please try to avoid passive tense and write it all in past tense. Do not write "three civilians are killed in shooting", write: "gunmen shot at civilians, killing three"
Do it by this order:
Thank you-- Bolter21 ( talk to me) 09:27, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Following two AFD's in two months (one closed as no consensus, other non-admin keep) I propose January 2016 Paris police station attack be merged into List of terrorist incidents, January–June 2016 (where it is already covered). I think that the content of the article can easily be explained in the context of the terrorist incident list, and that the article is of a reasonable size that the merging of this article will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. Other far more significant attacks are already covered exclusively in the article. AusLondonder ( talk) 08:01, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Not done
E.M.Gregory (
talk)
09:51, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Should these realistically be described as "terrorist" attacks when the target of the attack is militarily legitimate? I can understand condemning attacks perpetrated by the likes of Daesh as such, due to their overtly sectarian and eliminationist motivations (particularly in the latter case when it comes to Sunnis who don't subscribe to Wahhabi-takfirism), but otherwise describing militant attacks on military personnel as "terroristic" seems to be decidedly subjective. Kyle renner ( talk) 23:18, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
I too share the concern that this page includes guerrilla attacks on military occupying forces, but does not include militant attacks on civilians. Especially since the threshold of "military significance" already reflects a POV that legitimizes activities performed by uniformed soldiers (and I do not mean to imply that this is only the case for the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict events listed here). This strikes me as a sign that the definition of terrorism being applied here waffles between being too wide and too narrow. This enables bias in the editing of the list. Jazzcowboy ( talk) 19:12, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
In my opinion, this page getting far too large.
Wikipedia policy states that an article that is larger than 100 kB should usually be divided, though this guideline applies less strongly to lists. However, this article is already over 140 kB, and still growing rapidly.
To ameliorate this size issue, I propose that it be split into three articles:
List of terrorist incidents in January 2016,
List of terrorist incidents in February 2016, and
List of terrorist incidents in March 2016. Further articles would be created in the coming months, starting from
List of terrorist incidents in April 2016.
Each of these articles would be around 50 kB, which is a much more reasonable size. In addition, dividing the article by month seems more natural than dividing it by six-monthly periods. Thoughts? Should we split this article up, or not?
Chessrat (
talk,
contributions)
21:02, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
List of terrorist incidents, January–June 2016. Please take a moment to review
my edit. You may add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 17:54, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
It seems that there are several attacks in Iraq (April 4, 2016), should there be a new article stating "2016 Iraq Attacks," should we combine these at the end of the day? Please let me know, I'd be more than happier to contribute. --William Phoenix 18:19, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Is it necessary to include acts of war in this article? They do not fit the generally accepted definition of terrorism in my view. I'm think about acts related to the Syrian civil war, the Second Libyan Civil War, Iraqi Civil War (2014–present) and the Israeli–Palestinian conflict Could they not be included in articles relating to those wars? Many of these supposed terrorist incidents are not described in reliable sources as such, so the inclusion amounts to WP:OR. AusLondonder ( talk) 15:38, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Would it be possible to provide another column in which the pages corresponding to specific incidents can be linked, for further viewing? Sheepythemouse ( talk) 21:29, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Just curious on your opinion of the Ethiopia killings, http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/19/africa/ethiopia-border-raids/
Not sure if this would be considered terrorism by the page guidelines.
Wolverinesblow ( talk) 03:52, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Are these two spate attacks? I linked a source that said 11 are killed, someone else linked a source stating 33 were killed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beejsterb ( talk • contribs) 21:36, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
This has been resolved. Ignore. Beejsterb ( talk) 00:22, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
Hey!
Someone add these: [2] [www.cbc.ca/news/world/egypt-explosion-1.3526419]
Which copyright protects one or two sentence fragments/extracts? Please provide source before restoring.-- Gerry1214 ( talk) 15:00, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violations need to be removed immediately, however, it is equally important to preserve the information. Is it possible to give a single editor access to removed content to extract event names/dates/refs for re-write? Other options much tougher (e.g. archive 1, 2). Baking Soda ( talk) 23:33, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. — Diannaa ( talk) 15:07, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on List of terrorist incidents, January–June 2016. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 23:07, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
My guess is no, but I am not 100% sure. http://www.iraqinews.com/iraq-war/peshmerga-announces-killing-140-isis-elements-battles-al-khazir-northeast-mosul/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beejsterb ( talk • contribs) 23:08, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Part of an ongoing conflict, against combatants, carried out by the military forces of Iraqi Kurdistan, basically a de facto state at this point. Could potentially be terroristic (though I highly doubt it considering the great number of IS forces killed, and the nature of the Syrian War), but I certainly wouldn't classify it as "non-state". Darkside Of Aquarius ( talk) 18:34, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
44 people were killed in attacks in and around Baghdad on June 9, 2016. Should an article be made? Although none were killed, soldiers from New Zealand and Australia were involved, so I am not sure if this would be an article that would be notable enough to be made or not?
This article is overinflated with various incidents, most having a very low notability. We simply cannot list physically all terror events on one list. In order to make some criteria for inclusion, i propose to start by listing only those terror events with mortal casualties - this would reduce the list by more than half and make some balance, since some regions of the world are covered in detail, while others (like Syria and Iraq) are provided only in relevance to most severe terror incidents. GreyShark ( dibra) 10:09, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Some sources list honour killings as terrorism. I am pretty sure that they are simply domestic violence. Anyone think that we should include them? There are lots.
I've changed it to "This is a timeline of attacks by violent non-state actors for political or unknown motives which took place in the first half of 2016, including terrorist incidents."
This is easier than having a separate drawn-out discussion with Bolter21 about every one of the hundreds of cases here where something isn't called terrorism in the source, or clearly has no known motive. The best solution would be only listing terroristic acts, like the title says, but that's not going to happen, is it? This is the next-best. Every single shooting in Iraq or Syria by a non-uniformed killer can stay, but Wikipedia doesn't look like it has no idea what terrorism is.
Fair enough? InedibleHulk (talk) 21:12, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
This objection doesn't work. There are a lot of mafia murders in New York City, often using guns. By this logic, we should presume every shooting there is a mafia hit. Stick with what's verifiable, not what you think is obvious. InedibleHulk (talk) 21:51, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
I know the idea of splitting this article was brought up in March and decided against, but at the end of June this article ended up being nearly 500 kB and the 14th-longest article in the English Wikipedia. I don't see any reason at this point not to switch this and subsequent articles to quarterly timeframes, considering this article actually crashed Firefox the first time I tried to load it today. I would undertake the split myself but there's probably some guideline at WikiProject Terrorism establishing the six-month timeframe, though I haven't found it. — TORTOISE WRATH 07:43, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
Kristijh ( talk) 18:01, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
In each month's list there should be a column in which we list the RS(s) that declare (or debate) whether the event is in fact terrorism. As it stands, a casual perusal of the months' lists suggests we are making a lot of those judgment calls. NewsAndEventsGuy ( talk) 01:00, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Talk:List of terrorist incidents#RfC: List criteria. –
Leviv
ich
17:58, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
After cleaning up the separate pages for each month to comply with the inclusion criteria determined by this RfC, the individual lists are so short that there is no need to have separate ones for each month. I propose that the lists for the months be merged into a single list for the year. TompaDompa ( talk) 13:53, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | To be included on this
stand-alone list, each entry should meet the following
list criteria (
see discussion):
|
![]() | The contents of the List of terrorist incidents in March 2016 page were merged into List of terrorist incidents in 2016 on 31 July 2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
![]() | The contents of the List of terrorist incidents in May 2016 page were merged into List of terrorist incidents in 2016 on 31 July 2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
![]() | The contents of the List of terrorist incidents in September 2016 page were merged into List of terrorist incidents in 2016 on 31 July 2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
I dispute the inclusion of the alleged stabbing on the 17 January in Palestine, described as a "Melee attack". One unidentified person stabbed another unidentified civilian. No terrorist organisation claimed to be responsible. How does that equate to terrorism? Why not just crime? AusLondonder ( talk) 08:30, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
@ Rossbawse: @ 84.101.141.18: @ 92.134.228.44: @ Kristijh:
I think I should note the format I use for the description which is used in over half of the incidents in the article. So in order to have a consistant list, I think you should adopt this format. If you think you can improve it, feel free to offer.
Please try to avoid passive tense and write it all in past tense. Do not write "three civilians are killed in shooting", write: "gunmen shot at civilians, killing three"
Do it by this order:
Thank you-- Bolter21 ( talk to me) 09:27, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Following two AFD's in two months (one closed as no consensus, other non-admin keep) I propose January 2016 Paris police station attack be merged into List of terrorist incidents, January–June 2016 (where it is already covered). I think that the content of the article can easily be explained in the context of the terrorist incident list, and that the article is of a reasonable size that the merging of this article will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. Other far more significant attacks are already covered exclusively in the article. AusLondonder ( talk) 08:01, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Not done
E.M.Gregory (
talk)
09:51, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Should these realistically be described as "terrorist" attacks when the target of the attack is militarily legitimate? I can understand condemning attacks perpetrated by the likes of Daesh as such, due to their overtly sectarian and eliminationist motivations (particularly in the latter case when it comes to Sunnis who don't subscribe to Wahhabi-takfirism), but otherwise describing militant attacks on military personnel as "terroristic" seems to be decidedly subjective. Kyle renner ( talk) 23:18, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
I too share the concern that this page includes guerrilla attacks on military occupying forces, but does not include militant attacks on civilians. Especially since the threshold of "military significance" already reflects a POV that legitimizes activities performed by uniformed soldiers (and I do not mean to imply that this is only the case for the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict events listed here). This strikes me as a sign that the definition of terrorism being applied here waffles between being too wide and too narrow. This enables bias in the editing of the list. Jazzcowboy ( talk) 19:12, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
In my opinion, this page getting far too large.
Wikipedia policy states that an article that is larger than 100 kB should usually be divided, though this guideline applies less strongly to lists. However, this article is already over 140 kB, and still growing rapidly.
To ameliorate this size issue, I propose that it be split into three articles:
List of terrorist incidents in January 2016,
List of terrorist incidents in February 2016, and
List of terrorist incidents in March 2016. Further articles would be created in the coming months, starting from
List of terrorist incidents in April 2016.
Each of these articles would be around 50 kB, which is a much more reasonable size. In addition, dividing the article by month seems more natural than dividing it by six-monthly periods. Thoughts? Should we split this article up, or not?
Chessrat (
talk,
contributions)
21:02, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
List of terrorist incidents, January–June 2016. Please take a moment to review
my edit. You may add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 17:54, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
It seems that there are several attacks in Iraq (April 4, 2016), should there be a new article stating "2016 Iraq Attacks," should we combine these at the end of the day? Please let me know, I'd be more than happier to contribute. --William Phoenix 18:19, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Is it necessary to include acts of war in this article? They do not fit the generally accepted definition of terrorism in my view. I'm think about acts related to the Syrian civil war, the Second Libyan Civil War, Iraqi Civil War (2014–present) and the Israeli–Palestinian conflict Could they not be included in articles relating to those wars? Many of these supposed terrorist incidents are not described in reliable sources as such, so the inclusion amounts to WP:OR. AusLondonder ( talk) 15:38, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Would it be possible to provide another column in which the pages corresponding to specific incidents can be linked, for further viewing? Sheepythemouse ( talk) 21:29, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Just curious on your opinion of the Ethiopia killings, http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/19/africa/ethiopia-border-raids/
Not sure if this would be considered terrorism by the page guidelines.
Wolverinesblow ( talk) 03:52, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Are these two spate attacks? I linked a source that said 11 are killed, someone else linked a source stating 33 were killed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beejsterb ( talk • contribs) 21:36, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
This has been resolved. Ignore. Beejsterb ( talk) 00:22, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
Hey!
Someone add these: [2] [www.cbc.ca/news/world/egypt-explosion-1.3526419]
Which copyright protects one or two sentence fragments/extracts? Please provide source before restoring.-- Gerry1214 ( talk) 15:00, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violations need to be removed immediately, however, it is equally important to preserve the information. Is it possible to give a single editor access to removed content to extract event names/dates/refs for re-write? Other options much tougher (e.g. archive 1, 2). Baking Soda ( talk) 23:33, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. — Diannaa ( talk) 15:07, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on List of terrorist incidents, January–June 2016. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 23:07, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
My guess is no, but I am not 100% sure. http://www.iraqinews.com/iraq-war/peshmerga-announces-killing-140-isis-elements-battles-al-khazir-northeast-mosul/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beejsterb ( talk • contribs) 23:08, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Part of an ongoing conflict, against combatants, carried out by the military forces of Iraqi Kurdistan, basically a de facto state at this point. Could potentially be terroristic (though I highly doubt it considering the great number of IS forces killed, and the nature of the Syrian War), but I certainly wouldn't classify it as "non-state". Darkside Of Aquarius ( talk) 18:34, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
44 people were killed in attacks in and around Baghdad on June 9, 2016. Should an article be made? Although none were killed, soldiers from New Zealand and Australia were involved, so I am not sure if this would be an article that would be notable enough to be made or not?
This article is overinflated with various incidents, most having a very low notability. We simply cannot list physically all terror events on one list. In order to make some criteria for inclusion, i propose to start by listing only those terror events with mortal casualties - this would reduce the list by more than half and make some balance, since some regions of the world are covered in detail, while others (like Syria and Iraq) are provided only in relevance to most severe terror incidents. GreyShark ( dibra) 10:09, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Some sources list honour killings as terrorism. I am pretty sure that they are simply domestic violence. Anyone think that we should include them? There are lots.
I've changed it to "This is a timeline of attacks by violent non-state actors for political or unknown motives which took place in the first half of 2016, including terrorist incidents."
This is easier than having a separate drawn-out discussion with Bolter21 about every one of the hundreds of cases here where something isn't called terrorism in the source, or clearly has no known motive. The best solution would be only listing terroristic acts, like the title says, but that's not going to happen, is it? This is the next-best. Every single shooting in Iraq or Syria by a non-uniformed killer can stay, but Wikipedia doesn't look like it has no idea what terrorism is.
Fair enough? InedibleHulk (talk) 21:12, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
This objection doesn't work. There are a lot of mafia murders in New York City, often using guns. By this logic, we should presume every shooting there is a mafia hit. Stick with what's verifiable, not what you think is obvious. InedibleHulk (talk) 21:51, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
I know the idea of splitting this article was brought up in March and decided against, but at the end of June this article ended up being nearly 500 kB and the 14th-longest article in the English Wikipedia. I don't see any reason at this point not to switch this and subsequent articles to quarterly timeframes, considering this article actually crashed Firefox the first time I tried to load it today. I would undertake the split myself but there's probably some guideline at WikiProject Terrorism establishing the six-month timeframe, though I haven't found it. — TORTOISE WRATH 07:43, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
Kristijh ( talk) 18:01, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
In each month's list there should be a column in which we list the RS(s) that declare (or debate) whether the event is in fact terrorism. As it stands, a casual perusal of the months' lists suggests we are making a lot of those judgment calls. NewsAndEventsGuy ( talk) 01:00, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Talk:List of terrorist incidents#RfC: List criteria. –
Leviv
ich
17:58, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
After cleaning up the separate pages for each month to comply with the inclusion criteria determined by this RfC, the individual lists are so short that there is no need to have separate ones for each month. I propose that the lists for the months be merged into a single list for the year. TompaDompa ( talk) 13:53, 29 July 2020 (UTC)