For the temples that have the date of the announcement in the notes, I think there should be consistency in the ones announced at General Conference. i.e. of the form: Announced by [[Thomas S. Monson]] at the 200th Semiannual General Conference (October 5, 2030)<ref>...</ref>
I found a great site with the latest in temple news. Though not officially endorsed or operated by the Church, it has up-to-the-minute information on temples. The site is as follows: LDS Temples Site. Information on the site can be easily verified by news stories in the Deseret News, the Church News, and the Church's website. It seems to me, though, that having one source would be simpler than the three, and the LDS Church Temples page combines all three sources. According to the site's chronological list, ground was broken for the Sapporo Japan Temple on October 22, 2011 by Gary E. Stevenson; and for the Fortaleza Brazil Temple on November 15, 2011 by David A. Bednar. Also, according to the webmaster of that site, Church officials, who feed him information for his site, state that the July "announcement" of the Paris France temple was more an acknowledgement of future plans to have a temple, and that the official announcement date for the temple was 1 October 2011, making a total of six temples announced on that date. The order of the announced temples, according to President Monson's opening address at the October General Conference, the order of temples on the site and consequently WP's order of these six should be as follows: Provo City Center Temple (working name that the Church prefers over any other name); Barranquilla Colombia Temple; Durban South Africa Temple; Kinshasa Democratic Republic of Congo Temple; Star Valley Wyoming Temple; and Paris France Temple. Making these changes myself is beyond my area of expertise, so I have posted this information, and someone else can take care of the actual fixing of the page. Hope this information is helpful to you. -- Jgstokes-We can disagree without being disagreeable ( talk) 23:07, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
To ARTEST4ECHO: I was noticing that the content of this page doesn’t match latest information found on ldschurchtemples.com, and I was asking for help to make it more like that, since I didn’t understand the formatting.
To Trödel: I am pleased to learn how information for ldschurchtemples.com is being used here on WP. You told me many things about that which I didn’t know, so, thanks. My question was not about licensing. According to the webmaster of the site, any information on there can be used in any aspect as long as it is attributed, since his site is not officially endorsed or operated by the Church.
On the order question, I think we should list them in the order they were announced. For example, in October 2010, President Thomas S. Monson announced 5 new temples. The order he announced them was not alphabetical. Instead it was as follows: Lisbon, Portugal; Indianapolis, Indiana; Urdaneta, Philippines; Hartford, Connecticut; and Tijuana, Mexico. As We Meet Again Since that is verifiable, I feel that this is the order we should use on WP. It is illogical to list these temples in alphabetical order when the announced order was so different.
Next, on the Paris France Temple, the July 15 date WAS much more an acknowledgement date. The actual announcement came on October 1. Why else would the November 2011 ‘‘ Ensign’’ cover claim “six new temples announced” if that were not the case? In the news of the Church section for that ‘‘ Ensign’’, no mention was made about the earlier announcement of the Paris France Temple. So, 1 October 2011 is the acknowledged date when the Paris France Temple was officially announced, and that is how it should appear here on WP. Now, a word about the rebuilt Provo Tabernacle’s conversion to a temple: Many names have been suggested. On WP, it is listed as the “Provo Utah Tabernacle Temple.” But according to the webmaster of ldschurchtemples.com, the Church officially favors a name that makes no reference to the tabernacle from whence it came. The working title for that temple, according to Church headquarters, is the Provo City Center Temple. That information is verified by the LDS Church Temples site.
As to the order of the temples announced in November 2011, it makes sense to me to list them in the order that President Monson announced them. According to As We Meet Again, the order is as follows: Provo City Center Temple; Barranquilla Columbia Temple; Durban South Africa Temple; Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo Temple; Star Valley Wyoming Temple; and Paris France Temple. If that is the order favored by the Church, that is the order that should be used here on WP. Thoughts?
I tried to move the temples that have had ground broken, but with no success. The fact that ground has been broken for the Sapporo Japan and Fortaleza Brazil Temples is verified on the LDS Church Temples Site, and links are posted for the individual listings on that temple for verification from lds.org, ldschurchnews.com, and deseretnews.com. So we can use ldschurchtemples.com as a verifiable source for the groundbreakings that need to be added to WP. I still don’t understand the formatting, but I will let WP editors more knowledgeable than myself perform these changes. Thanks for the feedback and the help. -- Jgstokes-We can disagree without being disagreeable ( talk) 21:19, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Papeete Tahiti Temple.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 22:46, 9 February 2012 (UTC) |
Posting here to mention three changes on this page: two made and one yet-to-be made. I reordered the announced temples because the temples announced in October 2010 were not listed in the order they were announced. I also reordered the under construction temples. In my opinion, if a temple is scheduled for dedication, it should be listed before those for which no dedication date has yet been announced. Which is why in the list you will see that the Kansas City Missouri Temple is listed prior to those with an earlier groundbreaking date. I am going to reword the opening paragraph so it is less redundant. Please comment here before reverting any or all of these changes. Thanks. -- Jgstokes-We can disagree without being disagreeable ( talk) 06:22, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
According to this article, the official name for the second Provo Utah Temple is the "Provo City Center Temple." I think we should alter the relevant lists and articles to reflect this official information. All we were waiting for was verification, and we have it now, so it is my suggestion that we make this change official on WP. Thoughts? Thanks. -- Jgstokes-We can disagree without being disagreeable ( talk) 18:29, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
When I was reordering the temples based on the recent announcement of the forthcoming groundbreaking for the Provo City Center Temple, I noticed that someone had listed an earlier annoucnement date for the Hartford Conneticut Temple. It makes sense to me that a reference to an earlier announcement date should be made in the specific article about the temple, but in my mind, that information is not relevant to this page, because here we are concerned with the latest information available about temples. But I wanted to get your opinion on this as well. Am I right, or did I do the wrong thing? -- Jgstokes-We can disagree without being disagreeable ( talk) 07:01, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
According to this article, the open house and dedication dates have been announced for the Brigham City Utah temple. I have inserted this information into the page and reordered the under construction temples accordingly, but for some reason, I cannot change the status of this temple from "Under Construction" to "Dedication scheduled." Please help me with this. Thanks. Exciting news! -- Jgstokes-We can disagree without being disagreeable ( talk) 06:32, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
According to ldschurchtemples.com, the rededication of the Buenos Aires Argentina temple has been scheduled for 9 September 2012. I have added this information to the template and changed the status of the temple to "Rededication scheduled." Any questions? Thanks. -- Jgstokes-We can disagree without being disagreeable ( talk) 00:27, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
With the dedication of the Kansas City Missouri Temple last Sunday and the groundbreaking for the Provo City Center Temple that will be held on May 12, the template for current temple status needs to be changed so that it is clear that there are 137 operating temples (with 3 undergoing renovation), 15 under construction, and 14 announced. Tried to change that in the article myself but don't know how that template works. Thanks for your help with this important update. -- Jgstokes-We can disagree without being disagreeable ( talk) 07:20, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
Never mind. With a little experimentation, I managed to perform the needed updates myself. The only thing I would do differently next time is that I performed the move of the Provo City Center Temple in two moves rather than the one I could do it in. Oh, well. As of today, this page is up-to-date. Thanks anyways. -- Jgstokes-We can disagree without being disagreeable ( talk) 17:18, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
The Manaus Brazil temple was dedicated on June 10. I have added information about the dedication and moved it to the appropriate section. I have updated the status of LDS temples. As of now, this page is up-to-date. However, I was not able to find any specifications for this temple, so that information will have to be added. Thanks -- Jgstokes-We can disagree without being disagreeable ( talk) 04:37, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
The correct name for this temple is The Gila Valley Arizona Temple, with deliberate capitalization of the word "The". That is the way it appears on this page. However, the article about it merely calls it "Gila Valley Arizona Temple," which is not correct. Citizens of The Gila Valley would no doubt be incensed to find "The" missing from this temple. The WP page for this temple needs to be fixed. For verification of this fact, I refer you to the following The Gila Valley, plain and simple. That article was run when the temple was dedicated two years ago. Since this is a verifiable fact, I urge a change in the WP page about this temple ASAP. Post here with questions or comments. -- Jgstokes-We can disagree without being disagreeable ( talk) 04:37, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
It has been announced that ground will be broken for the Tijuana Mexico Temple on August 18. For verification of this information, see Tijuana Mexico Temple - LDS Church Temples. I have added this information to the appropriate template and have changed the status of this temple to "Groundbreaking scheduled." However, information about the groundbreaking is not visible. Could someone please help with this? Thanks. -- Jgstokes-We can disagree without being disagreeable ( talk) 18:41, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
![]() | Sorry all, but after over a month of discussion I can see no consensus for any sort of blanket action on these articles. I would suggest proposing mergers on a case-by-case basis as an alternative approach. Beeblebrox ( talk) 20:27, 18 September 2012 (UTC) |
Sure, the big temples like Salt Lake and L.A. are notable, but I'm wondering if the smaller, cookie-cutter ones from the '90s and early '00s like Medford really merit stand-alone articles. Consider the following:
In summary: I think that we should consider merging the small temples articles to other articles. p b p 16:08, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
Proposal that smaller LDS temples aren't notable. See above for proposal. When discussing, please remember to stay on-topic and consider relevant policy; and to not vote or assert blindly p b p 16:08, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
The Boise Idaho Temple is scheduled for rededication on November 18, 2012 after an open house from October 13-November 10. I found out that the rededication done in 1987 by James E. Faust was only for the additions. In trying to add this information, I goofed somewhere, and now I can't fix it. HELP! Thanks. -- Jgstokes-We can disagree without being disagreeable ( talk) 01:44, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
It's in that order as announced 6 October 2012. Someone will need to update real fast over next few months because of other Temples being dedicated or rededicated. Buenos Aires and Boise are major changes in design and layout. Samuelsenwd ( talk) 19:06, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
I notice that some of the coordinates are quoted to 10 decimal places of a degree (of latitude or longitude). I make it that a unit change in the last quoted digit corresponds to a movement of about 1/100 of a millimetre (more or less, depending on the latitude of the temple). As temples are quite substantial buildings, this level of (apparent) precision is meaningless and inappropriate. Five decimal places gives the position to within about a metre, and even with four decimal places (i.e. accurate to about 10 metres) you will still comfortably hit the building. 86.4.253.180 ( talk) 02:20, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
According to this article, the Tegucigalpa Honduras Temple was dedicated today by Dieter F. Uchtdorf. So I attempted to move it. It looks good, but there is a weird symbol of some sort where the status of under construction temples usually go. How do I get rid of that? Please help if you can. Thanks in advance. -- Jgstokes-We can disagree without being disagreeable ( talk) 01:53, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
This [1] April 6, 2013 article from the Deseret News is about the announcment of the Cedar City Utah and Rio de Jainero Brazil Temples. I tried to add them, but I think I did something wrong. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 18:20, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
Someone unilaterally changed the announcement date of the Paris France temple to 15 July 2011. Since the consensus previously decided to use the 1 October date (as the November 2011 Ensign cover read "Six New Temples Announced"), I have reverted that date back to 1 October. Please discuss here before reverting again. -- Jgstokes-We can disagree without being disagreeable ( talk) 08:08, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
According to ldschurchtemples.com, the two temples above will have their ground broken this month: Hartford on August 17 and Fort Collins on August 24. Accordingly, I will reorder the under construction temples and change their statuses to "Groundbreaking Scheduled." Hope this information is helpful to you. -- Jgstokes-We can disagree without being disagreeable ( talk) 07:49, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Hartford had its ground broken on August 17 by President Monson. Fort Collins will have its ground broken next Saturday. These changes need to be implemented to the page and the relevant updates to the templates performed. I just don't have time to take care of it myself right now. If someone could help with these items, I'd appreciate it. Thanks. -- Jgstokes-We can disagree without being disagreeable ( talk) 06:12, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
Just took care of it myself. How does it look? -- Jgstokes-We can disagree without being disagreeable ( talk) 04:16, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
For the temples that have the date of the announcement in the notes, I think there should be consistency in the ones announced at General Conference. i.e. of the form: Announced by [[Thomas S. Monson]] at the 200th Semiannual General Conference (October 5, 2030)<ref>...</ref>
I found a great site with the latest in temple news. Though not officially endorsed or operated by the Church, it has up-to-the-minute information on temples. The site is as follows: LDS Temples Site. Information on the site can be easily verified by news stories in the Deseret News, the Church News, and the Church's website. It seems to me, though, that having one source would be simpler than the three, and the LDS Church Temples page combines all three sources. According to the site's chronological list, ground was broken for the Sapporo Japan Temple on October 22, 2011 by Gary E. Stevenson; and for the Fortaleza Brazil Temple on November 15, 2011 by David A. Bednar. Also, according to the webmaster of that site, Church officials, who feed him information for his site, state that the July "announcement" of the Paris France temple was more an acknowledgement of future plans to have a temple, and that the official announcement date for the temple was 1 October 2011, making a total of six temples announced on that date. The order of the announced temples, according to President Monson's opening address at the October General Conference, the order of temples on the site and consequently WP's order of these six should be as follows: Provo City Center Temple (working name that the Church prefers over any other name); Barranquilla Colombia Temple; Durban South Africa Temple; Kinshasa Democratic Republic of Congo Temple; Star Valley Wyoming Temple; and Paris France Temple. Making these changes myself is beyond my area of expertise, so I have posted this information, and someone else can take care of the actual fixing of the page. Hope this information is helpful to you. -- Jgstokes-We can disagree without being disagreeable ( talk) 23:07, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
To ARTEST4ECHO: I was noticing that the content of this page doesn’t match latest information found on ldschurchtemples.com, and I was asking for help to make it more like that, since I didn’t understand the formatting.
To Trödel: I am pleased to learn how information for ldschurchtemples.com is being used here on WP. You told me many things about that which I didn’t know, so, thanks. My question was not about licensing. According to the webmaster of the site, any information on there can be used in any aspect as long as it is attributed, since his site is not officially endorsed or operated by the Church.
On the order question, I think we should list them in the order they were announced. For example, in October 2010, President Thomas S. Monson announced 5 new temples. The order he announced them was not alphabetical. Instead it was as follows: Lisbon, Portugal; Indianapolis, Indiana; Urdaneta, Philippines; Hartford, Connecticut; and Tijuana, Mexico. As We Meet Again Since that is verifiable, I feel that this is the order we should use on WP. It is illogical to list these temples in alphabetical order when the announced order was so different.
Next, on the Paris France Temple, the July 15 date WAS much more an acknowledgement date. The actual announcement came on October 1. Why else would the November 2011 ‘‘ Ensign’’ cover claim “six new temples announced” if that were not the case? In the news of the Church section for that ‘‘ Ensign’’, no mention was made about the earlier announcement of the Paris France Temple. So, 1 October 2011 is the acknowledged date when the Paris France Temple was officially announced, and that is how it should appear here on WP. Now, a word about the rebuilt Provo Tabernacle’s conversion to a temple: Many names have been suggested. On WP, it is listed as the “Provo Utah Tabernacle Temple.” But according to the webmaster of ldschurchtemples.com, the Church officially favors a name that makes no reference to the tabernacle from whence it came. The working title for that temple, according to Church headquarters, is the Provo City Center Temple. That information is verified by the LDS Church Temples site.
As to the order of the temples announced in November 2011, it makes sense to me to list them in the order that President Monson announced them. According to As We Meet Again, the order is as follows: Provo City Center Temple; Barranquilla Columbia Temple; Durban South Africa Temple; Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo Temple; Star Valley Wyoming Temple; and Paris France Temple. If that is the order favored by the Church, that is the order that should be used here on WP. Thoughts?
I tried to move the temples that have had ground broken, but with no success. The fact that ground has been broken for the Sapporo Japan and Fortaleza Brazil Temples is verified on the LDS Church Temples Site, and links are posted for the individual listings on that temple for verification from lds.org, ldschurchnews.com, and deseretnews.com. So we can use ldschurchtemples.com as a verifiable source for the groundbreakings that need to be added to WP. I still don’t understand the formatting, but I will let WP editors more knowledgeable than myself perform these changes. Thanks for the feedback and the help. -- Jgstokes-We can disagree without being disagreeable ( talk) 21:19, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Papeete Tahiti Temple.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 22:46, 9 February 2012 (UTC) |
Posting here to mention three changes on this page: two made and one yet-to-be made. I reordered the announced temples because the temples announced in October 2010 were not listed in the order they were announced. I also reordered the under construction temples. In my opinion, if a temple is scheduled for dedication, it should be listed before those for which no dedication date has yet been announced. Which is why in the list you will see that the Kansas City Missouri Temple is listed prior to those with an earlier groundbreaking date. I am going to reword the opening paragraph so it is less redundant. Please comment here before reverting any or all of these changes. Thanks. -- Jgstokes-We can disagree without being disagreeable ( talk) 06:22, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
According to this article, the official name for the second Provo Utah Temple is the "Provo City Center Temple." I think we should alter the relevant lists and articles to reflect this official information. All we were waiting for was verification, and we have it now, so it is my suggestion that we make this change official on WP. Thoughts? Thanks. -- Jgstokes-We can disagree without being disagreeable ( talk) 18:29, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
When I was reordering the temples based on the recent announcement of the forthcoming groundbreaking for the Provo City Center Temple, I noticed that someone had listed an earlier annoucnement date for the Hartford Conneticut Temple. It makes sense to me that a reference to an earlier announcement date should be made in the specific article about the temple, but in my mind, that information is not relevant to this page, because here we are concerned with the latest information available about temples. But I wanted to get your opinion on this as well. Am I right, or did I do the wrong thing? -- Jgstokes-We can disagree without being disagreeable ( talk) 07:01, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
According to this article, the open house and dedication dates have been announced for the Brigham City Utah temple. I have inserted this information into the page and reordered the under construction temples accordingly, but for some reason, I cannot change the status of this temple from "Under Construction" to "Dedication scheduled." Please help me with this. Thanks. Exciting news! -- Jgstokes-We can disagree without being disagreeable ( talk) 06:32, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
According to ldschurchtemples.com, the rededication of the Buenos Aires Argentina temple has been scheduled for 9 September 2012. I have added this information to the template and changed the status of the temple to "Rededication scheduled." Any questions? Thanks. -- Jgstokes-We can disagree without being disagreeable ( talk) 00:27, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
With the dedication of the Kansas City Missouri Temple last Sunday and the groundbreaking for the Provo City Center Temple that will be held on May 12, the template for current temple status needs to be changed so that it is clear that there are 137 operating temples (with 3 undergoing renovation), 15 under construction, and 14 announced. Tried to change that in the article myself but don't know how that template works. Thanks for your help with this important update. -- Jgstokes-We can disagree without being disagreeable ( talk) 07:20, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
Never mind. With a little experimentation, I managed to perform the needed updates myself. The only thing I would do differently next time is that I performed the move of the Provo City Center Temple in two moves rather than the one I could do it in. Oh, well. As of today, this page is up-to-date. Thanks anyways. -- Jgstokes-We can disagree without being disagreeable ( talk) 17:18, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
The Manaus Brazil temple was dedicated on June 10. I have added information about the dedication and moved it to the appropriate section. I have updated the status of LDS temples. As of now, this page is up-to-date. However, I was not able to find any specifications for this temple, so that information will have to be added. Thanks -- Jgstokes-We can disagree without being disagreeable ( talk) 04:37, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
The correct name for this temple is The Gila Valley Arizona Temple, with deliberate capitalization of the word "The". That is the way it appears on this page. However, the article about it merely calls it "Gila Valley Arizona Temple," which is not correct. Citizens of The Gila Valley would no doubt be incensed to find "The" missing from this temple. The WP page for this temple needs to be fixed. For verification of this fact, I refer you to the following The Gila Valley, plain and simple. That article was run when the temple was dedicated two years ago. Since this is a verifiable fact, I urge a change in the WP page about this temple ASAP. Post here with questions or comments. -- Jgstokes-We can disagree without being disagreeable ( talk) 04:37, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
It has been announced that ground will be broken for the Tijuana Mexico Temple on August 18. For verification of this information, see Tijuana Mexico Temple - LDS Church Temples. I have added this information to the appropriate template and have changed the status of this temple to "Groundbreaking scheduled." However, information about the groundbreaking is not visible. Could someone please help with this? Thanks. -- Jgstokes-We can disagree without being disagreeable ( talk) 18:41, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
![]() | Sorry all, but after over a month of discussion I can see no consensus for any sort of blanket action on these articles. I would suggest proposing mergers on a case-by-case basis as an alternative approach. Beeblebrox ( talk) 20:27, 18 September 2012 (UTC) |
Sure, the big temples like Salt Lake and L.A. are notable, but I'm wondering if the smaller, cookie-cutter ones from the '90s and early '00s like Medford really merit stand-alone articles. Consider the following:
In summary: I think that we should consider merging the small temples articles to other articles. p b p 16:08, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
Proposal that smaller LDS temples aren't notable. See above for proposal. When discussing, please remember to stay on-topic and consider relevant policy; and to not vote or assert blindly p b p 16:08, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
The Boise Idaho Temple is scheduled for rededication on November 18, 2012 after an open house from October 13-November 10. I found out that the rededication done in 1987 by James E. Faust was only for the additions. In trying to add this information, I goofed somewhere, and now I can't fix it. HELP! Thanks. -- Jgstokes-We can disagree without being disagreeable ( talk) 01:44, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
It's in that order as announced 6 October 2012. Someone will need to update real fast over next few months because of other Temples being dedicated or rededicated. Buenos Aires and Boise are major changes in design and layout. Samuelsenwd ( talk) 19:06, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
I notice that some of the coordinates are quoted to 10 decimal places of a degree (of latitude or longitude). I make it that a unit change in the last quoted digit corresponds to a movement of about 1/100 of a millimetre (more or less, depending on the latitude of the temple). As temples are quite substantial buildings, this level of (apparent) precision is meaningless and inappropriate. Five decimal places gives the position to within about a metre, and even with four decimal places (i.e. accurate to about 10 metres) you will still comfortably hit the building. 86.4.253.180 ( talk) 02:20, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
According to this article, the Tegucigalpa Honduras Temple was dedicated today by Dieter F. Uchtdorf. So I attempted to move it. It looks good, but there is a weird symbol of some sort where the status of under construction temples usually go. How do I get rid of that? Please help if you can. Thanks in advance. -- Jgstokes-We can disagree without being disagreeable ( talk) 01:53, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
This [1] April 6, 2013 article from the Deseret News is about the announcment of the Cedar City Utah and Rio de Jainero Brazil Temples. I tried to add them, but I think I did something wrong. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 18:20, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
Someone unilaterally changed the announcement date of the Paris France temple to 15 July 2011. Since the consensus previously decided to use the 1 October date (as the November 2011 Ensign cover read "Six New Temples Announced"), I have reverted that date back to 1 October. Please discuss here before reverting again. -- Jgstokes-We can disagree without being disagreeable ( talk) 08:08, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
According to ldschurchtemples.com, the two temples above will have their ground broken this month: Hartford on August 17 and Fort Collins on August 24. Accordingly, I will reorder the under construction temples and change their statuses to "Groundbreaking Scheduled." Hope this information is helpful to you. -- Jgstokes-We can disagree without being disagreeable ( talk) 07:49, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Hartford had its ground broken on August 17 by President Monson. Fort Collins will have its ground broken next Saturday. These changes need to be implemented to the page and the relevant updates to the templates performed. I just don't have time to take care of it myself right now. If someone could help with these items, I'd appreciate it. Thanks. -- Jgstokes-We can disagree without being disagreeable ( talk) 06:12, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
Just took care of it myself. How does it look? -- Jgstokes-We can disagree without being disagreeable ( talk) 04:16, 26 August 2013 (UTC)