 | This article was nominated for deletion on 24 July 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
_Gold_color.svg)
- Does anyone know why this article is being considered for deletion? Is it something that can be resolved? MissionInn.Jim ( talk) 13:17, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
- If the article is kept, it probably should be renamed "List of tallest buildings in Riverside, California". MissionInn.Jim ( talk) 13:21, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
- After reading I realized the discussion is at: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tallest buildings in Amarillo. Please ignore the above questions, but if the article is kept, it probably should be renamed.
Since the title of the "tallest" buildings of any particular area is normally determined by height, not the number of floors, I would like to propose we remove the ranking column, until the height of each building can be determined. Otherwise the ranking is misleading. Since the table is now sortable, the reader can arrange them in whatever order they choose anyway. If I don't see a response to this proposal in a week or so, I plan to remove the ranking. MissionInn.Jim ( talk) 16:21, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
|
| This article was nominated for deletion on 24 July 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
|
| This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
- Does anyone know why this article is being considered for deletion? Is it something that can be resolved? MissionInn.Jim ( talk) 13:17, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
- If the article is kept, it probably should be renamed "List of tallest buildings in Riverside, California". MissionInn.Jim ( talk) 13:21, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
- After reading I realized the discussion is at: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tallest buildings in Amarillo. Please ignore the above questions, but if the article is kept, it probably should be renamed.
Since the title of the "tallest" buildings of any particular area is normally determined by height, not the number of floors, I would like to propose we remove the ranking column, until the height of each building can be determined. Otherwise the ranking is misleading. Since the table is now sortable, the reader can arrange them in whatever order they choose anyway. If I don't see a response to this proposal in a week or so, I plan to remove the ranking. MissionInn.Jim ( talk) 16:21, 1 August 2009 (UTC)