![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
![]() | The contents of the RU Andromedae page were merged into List of stars in Andromeda on 6 November 2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
We should make the star table wider by adding more data into it in every opened articles in the list of stars by constellations and make it like the other web sites, such as star catalogues, right ascension, declination, absolute magnitude and spectral type. Currently, the table only contain Bayer designations, Flamsteed designations for some constellations, star name icons and proper names, apparent magnitudes, distance, comments, and sometimes right ascension and declination before aparent magnitude, distance, but after the names/designations. The figure of table from left to right is shown here:
Name | Designation | Location | Magnitude | Distance | Sp. class | Notes | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | F | HD | HIP | RA | Dec | vis. | abs. | Ly | Pc |
Thank you alot for making the new table style in the list of star by constellation articles, from Fornax to Lyra as of 23:45 UTC, December 26, 2006, but you should add one more thing, "distance in parsec". For more information about the distance, look in Talk:List of stars in Lyra and Talk:List of stars in Vulpecula. Cosmium 00:34, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Etymologies listed in this table don't fit into the new table, so please add them in respective star articles with sources.-- JyriL talk 16:54, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
BD | F | Names and other designations | Mag. | Ly away | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
α | 21 | Alpha Andromedae, Alpheratz, Alpherat, Al'faret, Al'ferats, Sirrah, Sirah, Sirrakh | 2.06 | 97.1 |
|
β | 43 | Beta Andromedae, Mirach, Merach, Mirac, Mirak, Mirakh, Merak, Mirar, Mirath, Mirax, El Mizar, Al Mizar | 2.07 | 199 |
|
γ¹,² | 57 | Gamma Andromedae, Almach, Almaak, Alamak, Almak, Almaach, Alamac, Al'mak | 2.26 | 355 |
|
δ | 31 | Delta Andromedae, Sadiradra, Saderazra, Sadir Elazra | 3.27 | 101 |
|
51 | 51 Andromedae, Anfal, El Enfal | 3.59 | 174 |
| |
ο | 1 | Omicron Andromedae | 3.62 | 692 | |
λ | 16 | Lambda Andromedae | 3.81 | 84.2 | |
μ | 37 | Mu Andromedae | 3.86 | 136 | |
ζ | 34 | Zeta Andromedae | 4.08 | 181 | |
υ | 50 | Upsilon Andromedae, Adhab, Azab | 4.09 | 43.9 |
|
κ | 19 | Kappa Andromedae | 4.15 | 170 | |
φ | 42 | Phi Andromedae, Keun Nan Mun | 4.26 | 740 |
|
ι | 17 | Iota Andromedae | 4.29 | 503 | |
ε | 30 | Epsilon Andromedae | 4.34 | 169 | |
π | 29 | Pi Andromedae | 4.34 | 660 | |
η | 34 | Eta Andromedae | 4.40 | 243 | |
σ | 25 | Sigma Andromedae | 4.51 | 141 | |
ν | 35 | Nu Andromedae | 4.53 | 680 | |
7 | 7 Andromedae | 4.53 | 63.6... | ||
θ | 24 | Theta Andromedae | 4.61 | 253 | |
3 | 3 Andromedae | 4.64 | 927 | ||
65 | 65 Andromedae | 4.73 | 307 | ||
58 | 58 Andromedae | 4.78 | 580 | ||
8 | 8 Andromedae | 4.82 | 655 | ||
ω | 48 | Omega Andromedae | 4.83 | 92.3 | |
b | 60 | 60 Andromedae | 4.84 | 557 | |
ξ | 46 | Xi Andromedae, Adhil | 4.88 | 196 |
|
τ | 53 | Tau Andromedae | 4.96 | 680 | |
ψ | 20 | Psi Andromedae | 4.97 | 1310 | |
χ | 52 | Chi Andromedae, Keun Nan Mun | 5.01 | 242 |
|
22 | 22 Andromedae | 5.01 | 1639 | ||
41 | 41 Andromedae | 5.04 | 106.4 | ||
2 | 2 Andromedae | 5.09 | 95.6 | ||
ρ | 27 | Rho Andromedae | 5.16 | 160 | |
64 | 64 Andromedae | 5.19 | 3507 | ||
28 | 28 Andromedae | 5.20 | 2297 | ||
14 | 14 Andromedae | 5.22 | 211.5 | ||
A | 49 | 49 Andromedae | 5.27 | 222 | |
4 | 4 Andromedae | 5.30 | |||
32 | 32 Andromedae | 5.30 | 260 | ||
c | 62 | 62 Andromedae | 5.31 | 224.7 | |
18 | 18 Andromedae | 5.35 | |||
55 | 55 Andromedae | 5.42 | 513.6 | ||
11 | 11 Andromedae | 5.44 | 197 | ||
36 | 36 Andromedae | 5.46 | 146.8 | ||
15 | 15 Andromedae | 5.55 | 236.52 | ||
63 | 63 Andromedae | 5.57 | |||
47 | 47 Andromedae | 5.60 | |||
44 | 44 Andromedae | 5.67 | |||
5 | 5 Andromedae | 5.68 | 157.3... | ||
56 | 56 Andromedae | 5.69 | |||
23 | 23 Andromedae | 5.71 | 137.56 | ||
13 | 13 Andromedae | 5.75 | |||
12 | 12 Andromedae | 5.77 | |||
45 | 45 Andromedae | 5.80 | 867.4... | ||
10 | 10 Andromedae | 5.81 | |||
6 | 6 Andromedae | 5.91 | 141 | ||
39 | 39 Andromedae | 5.95 | |||
9 | 9 Andromedae | 5.98 | |||
59 | 59 Andromedae | 6.09 | 272 | ||
26 | 26 Andromedae | 6.10 | |||
66 | 66 Andromedae | 6.16 | |||
HR 465, GY Andromedae | 6.36 | 455 |
| ||
59 | 59 Andromedae | 6.82 | 264 | ||
Groombridge 34, GQ Andromedae, GX Andromedae | 8.01 | 11.62 |
| ||
Ross 248 | 12.29 | 10.32 |
| ||
S Andromedae, Supernova 1885 | 2.9 million |
|
List of stars in Andromeda → List of stars in the constellation Andromeda — "Andromeda" is highly ambiguous, since it's the name of a constellation and of a widely known galaxy, so a less ambiguous name should be used. — 76.66.195.63 ( talk) 02:46, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
*'''Support'''
or *'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with ~~~~
. Since
polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account
Wikipedia's naming conventions.I think that there is no possibility to make any ambiguity: if sometime a list of stars known in the Andromeda Galaxy, hits title will be List of stars of the Andromeda Galaxy. Furthermore, all other 87 lists of stars by constellations are "List of stars in...", why this list has to be different? -- Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 11:10, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
The long harangues star name variants don't serve any good purpose in star lists. Most of those name variants are not used any more. As far as I can tell from the source, Quinta Struthionum is Knobel's unmotivated translation to Latin of Khamis al Namet. This is wrong, and no indication that "names" such as Quinta Struthionum were ever used. The main flood of Arabic star names occurred in the immediate aftermath of Reconquista especially around 1250 (see the Alfonsine tables) when Almagest was translated into Latin. They kept the Arabic star names without translation, but generally with a certain transcription obfuscation, such as Zuban aš-Šamaliyy (?) becoming Zubeneschemali. Original star and constellation names of Antiquity from before the Islamic Golden Age were generally Greek, Canopus/Kanobos, Arcturus/Arktouros, while the Latinization mostly regarded the constellations. Knobels translation Quinta Struthionum is from 1895. It should not be regarded as a genuine star name. Rursus dixit. ( mbork3!) 07:11, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
All other such lists of stars in the respective constellations are named "List of stars in [constellation]"; this seems to be the one exception. It is unclear why. Any thoughts? Regards, RJH ( talk) 22:39, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
What is the source of the position data for the stars in the table? The legend says that it is Epoch 2000.0, but it isn't. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tlj18 ( talk • contribs) 21:09, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved per request. Favonian ( talk) 19:34, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
List of stars in the constellation Andromeda → List of stars in Andromeda – All of the other lists of stars in constellations are in this format. I see no reason why this one shouldn't be either. String Theory 11 20:21, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
*'''Support'''
or *'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with ~~~~
. Since
polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account
Wikipedia's policy on article titles.![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
![]() | The contents of the RU Andromedae page were merged into List of stars in Andromeda on 6 November 2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
We should make the star table wider by adding more data into it in every opened articles in the list of stars by constellations and make it like the other web sites, such as star catalogues, right ascension, declination, absolute magnitude and spectral type. Currently, the table only contain Bayer designations, Flamsteed designations for some constellations, star name icons and proper names, apparent magnitudes, distance, comments, and sometimes right ascension and declination before aparent magnitude, distance, but after the names/designations. The figure of table from left to right is shown here:
Name | Designation | Location | Magnitude | Distance | Sp. class | Notes | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | F | HD | HIP | RA | Dec | vis. | abs. | Ly | Pc |
Thank you alot for making the new table style in the list of star by constellation articles, from Fornax to Lyra as of 23:45 UTC, December 26, 2006, but you should add one more thing, "distance in parsec". For more information about the distance, look in Talk:List of stars in Lyra and Talk:List of stars in Vulpecula. Cosmium 00:34, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Etymologies listed in this table don't fit into the new table, so please add them in respective star articles with sources.-- JyriL talk 16:54, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
BD | F | Names and other designations | Mag. | Ly away | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
α | 21 | Alpha Andromedae, Alpheratz, Alpherat, Al'faret, Al'ferats, Sirrah, Sirah, Sirrakh | 2.06 | 97.1 |
|
β | 43 | Beta Andromedae, Mirach, Merach, Mirac, Mirak, Mirakh, Merak, Mirar, Mirath, Mirax, El Mizar, Al Mizar | 2.07 | 199 |
|
γ¹,² | 57 | Gamma Andromedae, Almach, Almaak, Alamak, Almak, Almaach, Alamac, Al'mak | 2.26 | 355 |
|
δ | 31 | Delta Andromedae, Sadiradra, Saderazra, Sadir Elazra | 3.27 | 101 |
|
51 | 51 Andromedae, Anfal, El Enfal | 3.59 | 174 |
| |
ο | 1 | Omicron Andromedae | 3.62 | 692 | |
λ | 16 | Lambda Andromedae | 3.81 | 84.2 | |
μ | 37 | Mu Andromedae | 3.86 | 136 | |
ζ | 34 | Zeta Andromedae | 4.08 | 181 | |
υ | 50 | Upsilon Andromedae, Adhab, Azab | 4.09 | 43.9 |
|
κ | 19 | Kappa Andromedae | 4.15 | 170 | |
φ | 42 | Phi Andromedae, Keun Nan Mun | 4.26 | 740 |
|
ι | 17 | Iota Andromedae | 4.29 | 503 | |
ε | 30 | Epsilon Andromedae | 4.34 | 169 | |
π | 29 | Pi Andromedae | 4.34 | 660 | |
η | 34 | Eta Andromedae | 4.40 | 243 | |
σ | 25 | Sigma Andromedae | 4.51 | 141 | |
ν | 35 | Nu Andromedae | 4.53 | 680 | |
7 | 7 Andromedae | 4.53 | 63.6... | ||
θ | 24 | Theta Andromedae | 4.61 | 253 | |
3 | 3 Andromedae | 4.64 | 927 | ||
65 | 65 Andromedae | 4.73 | 307 | ||
58 | 58 Andromedae | 4.78 | 580 | ||
8 | 8 Andromedae | 4.82 | 655 | ||
ω | 48 | Omega Andromedae | 4.83 | 92.3 | |
b | 60 | 60 Andromedae | 4.84 | 557 | |
ξ | 46 | Xi Andromedae, Adhil | 4.88 | 196 |
|
τ | 53 | Tau Andromedae | 4.96 | 680 | |
ψ | 20 | Psi Andromedae | 4.97 | 1310 | |
χ | 52 | Chi Andromedae, Keun Nan Mun | 5.01 | 242 |
|
22 | 22 Andromedae | 5.01 | 1639 | ||
41 | 41 Andromedae | 5.04 | 106.4 | ||
2 | 2 Andromedae | 5.09 | 95.6 | ||
ρ | 27 | Rho Andromedae | 5.16 | 160 | |
64 | 64 Andromedae | 5.19 | 3507 | ||
28 | 28 Andromedae | 5.20 | 2297 | ||
14 | 14 Andromedae | 5.22 | 211.5 | ||
A | 49 | 49 Andromedae | 5.27 | 222 | |
4 | 4 Andromedae | 5.30 | |||
32 | 32 Andromedae | 5.30 | 260 | ||
c | 62 | 62 Andromedae | 5.31 | 224.7 | |
18 | 18 Andromedae | 5.35 | |||
55 | 55 Andromedae | 5.42 | 513.6 | ||
11 | 11 Andromedae | 5.44 | 197 | ||
36 | 36 Andromedae | 5.46 | 146.8 | ||
15 | 15 Andromedae | 5.55 | 236.52 | ||
63 | 63 Andromedae | 5.57 | |||
47 | 47 Andromedae | 5.60 | |||
44 | 44 Andromedae | 5.67 | |||
5 | 5 Andromedae | 5.68 | 157.3... | ||
56 | 56 Andromedae | 5.69 | |||
23 | 23 Andromedae | 5.71 | 137.56 | ||
13 | 13 Andromedae | 5.75 | |||
12 | 12 Andromedae | 5.77 | |||
45 | 45 Andromedae | 5.80 | 867.4... | ||
10 | 10 Andromedae | 5.81 | |||
6 | 6 Andromedae | 5.91 | 141 | ||
39 | 39 Andromedae | 5.95 | |||
9 | 9 Andromedae | 5.98 | |||
59 | 59 Andromedae | 6.09 | 272 | ||
26 | 26 Andromedae | 6.10 | |||
66 | 66 Andromedae | 6.16 | |||
HR 465, GY Andromedae | 6.36 | 455 |
| ||
59 | 59 Andromedae | 6.82 | 264 | ||
Groombridge 34, GQ Andromedae, GX Andromedae | 8.01 | 11.62 |
| ||
Ross 248 | 12.29 | 10.32 |
| ||
S Andromedae, Supernova 1885 | 2.9 million |
|
List of stars in Andromeda → List of stars in the constellation Andromeda — "Andromeda" is highly ambiguous, since it's the name of a constellation and of a widely known galaxy, so a less ambiguous name should be used. — 76.66.195.63 ( talk) 02:46, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
*'''Support'''
or *'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with ~~~~
. Since
polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account
Wikipedia's naming conventions.I think that there is no possibility to make any ambiguity: if sometime a list of stars known in the Andromeda Galaxy, hits title will be List of stars of the Andromeda Galaxy. Furthermore, all other 87 lists of stars by constellations are "List of stars in...", why this list has to be different? -- Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 11:10, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
The long harangues star name variants don't serve any good purpose in star lists. Most of those name variants are not used any more. As far as I can tell from the source, Quinta Struthionum is Knobel's unmotivated translation to Latin of Khamis al Namet. This is wrong, and no indication that "names" such as Quinta Struthionum were ever used. The main flood of Arabic star names occurred in the immediate aftermath of Reconquista especially around 1250 (see the Alfonsine tables) when Almagest was translated into Latin. They kept the Arabic star names without translation, but generally with a certain transcription obfuscation, such as Zuban aš-Šamaliyy (?) becoming Zubeneschemali. Original star and constellation names of Antiquity from before the Islamic Golden Age were generally Greek, Canopus/Kanobos, Arcturus/Arktouros, while the Latinization mostly regarded the constellations. Knobels translation Quinta Struthionum is from 1895. It should not be regarded as a genuine star name. Rursus dixit. ( mbork3!) 07:11, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
All other such lists of stars in the respective constellations are named "List of stars in [constellation]"; this seems to be the one exception. It is unclear why. Any thoughts? Regards, RJH ( talk) 22:39, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
What is the source of the position data for the stars in the table? The legend says that it is Epoch 2000.0, but it isn't. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tlj18 ( talk • contribs) 21:09, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved per request. Favonian ( talk) 19:34, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
List of stars in the constellation Andromeda → List of stars in Andromeda – All of the other lists of stars in constellations are in this format. I see no reason why this one shouldn't be either. String Theory 11 20:21, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
*'''Support'''
or *'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with ~~~~
. Since
polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account
Wikipedia's policy on article titles.