 | This article was nominated for deletion on 15 October 2006. The result of the discussion was no consensus (thus keep). |
Not alot goes on in a year. That's why I'm proposing the reorganisation of all the list of sovereign states in xxxx pages ( master list here) into decades instead of single years (e.g. List of sovereign states in the 1990s). Organising these lists by single years is just not practical. The lists are:
- rarely frequented,
- incredibly unmanageable,
- never maintained,
- unsourced,
- easily susceptible to POVs
- and very problematic to improve.
All of these things just lead to wrong information being put forth, and it's a stupid way to present this kind of data. All lists were proposed for deletion in 2006. The decade movement has already been proposed before, but apparently the editor lost momentum. Reorganising the lists into decades means that they become more manageable and therefore less susceptible to vandalism and unverified edits. I chose the 2000s as a starting point, but if I can get community approval, I'll do it for the rest of the decades aswell. Night w ( talk) 16:22, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
- I would be fine with organizing the list by decade but I'm worried that at a certain point it would become too cumbersome for the reader to understand, especially in more complicated decades like the 1940s. Could you maybe do a sandbox version of the 2000s or 1990s so we could see what the pages would look like?
Orange Tuesday (
talk)
17:45, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
- If there's a period (like during the World Wars) that requires greater division, then we can stick to years in those cases, but I'm certainly game to try and see how if it works. I think 2000-2009 certainly does. The draft is
here. No major differences in the first category. The second is good too, but I still have to add the commentaries that were on the 07-09 pages. The last category is a little more pedantic with the terminology changes, but I'm going to clean that up. Most of the information was cut and paste, so I can't guarantee the facts displayed—but I'm hoping the broader time coverage will be able to get greater traffic flow from editors.
Night w (
talk)
07:44, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
- Draft for 1990s here. Night w ( talk) 15:59, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
- Draft for 1980s here. Night w ( talk) 00:25, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
- Draft for 1970s here. Night w ( talk) 16:25, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
- Draft for 1960s here. Night w ( talk) 08:24, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
- Draft for 1950s here. Night w ( talk) 14:21, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
- If there's a period (like during the World Wars) that requires greater division, then we can stick to years in those cases, but I'm certainly game to try and see how if it works. I think 2000-2009 certainly does. The draft is
here. No major differences in the first category. The second is good too, but I still have to add the commentaries that were on the 07-09 pages. The last category is a little more pedantic with the terminology changes, but I'm going to clean that up. Most of the information was cut and paste, so I can't guarantee the facts displayed—but I'm hoping the broader time coverage will be able to get greater traffic flow from editors.
Night w (
talk)
07:44, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
Merges completed. Night w ( talk) 03:32, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
- It isn't working very well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.55.212.221 ( talk) 18:18, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of sovereign states in 2000. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151203000000/http://www.orderofmalta.int/diplomatic-relations/862/sovereign-order-of-malta-bilateral-relations/?lang=en to http://www.orderofmalta.int/diplomatic-relations/862/sovereign-order-of-malta-bilateral-relations/?lang=en
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:08, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 00:37, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
|
| This article was nominated for deletion on 15 October 2006. The result of the discussion was no consensus (thus keep). |
Not alot goes on in a year. That's why I'm proposing the reorganisation of all the list of sovereign states in xxxx pages ( master list here) into decades instead of single years (e.g. List of sovereign states in the 1990s). Organising these lists by single years is just not practical. The lists are:
- rarely frequented,
- incredibly unmanageable,
- never maintained,
- unsourced,
- easily susceptible to POVs
- and very problematic to improve.
All of these things just lead to wrong information being put forth, and it's a stupid way to present this kind of data. All lists were proposed for deletion in 2006. The decade movement has already been proposed before, but apparently the editor lost momentum. Reorganising the lists into decades means that they become more manageable and therefore less susceptible to vandalism and unverified edits. I chose the 2000s as a starting point, but if I can get community approval, I'll do it for the rest of the decades aswell. Night w ( talk) 16:22, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
- I would be fine with organizing the list by decade but I'm worried that at a certain point it would become too cumbersome for the reader to understand, especially in more complicated decades like the 1940s. Could you maybe do a sandbox version of the 2000s or 1990s so we could see what the pages would look like?
Orange Tuesday (
talk)
17:45, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
- If there's a period (like during the World Wars) that requires greater division, then we can stick to years in those cases, but I'm certainly game to try and see how if it works. I think 2000-2009 certainly does. The draft is
here. No major differences in the first category. The second is good too, but I still have to add the commentaries that were on the 07-09 pages. The last category is a little more pedantic with the terminology changes, but I'm going to clean that up. Most of the information was cut and paste, so I can't guarantee the facts displayed—but I'm hoping the broader time coverage will be able to get greater traffic flow from editors.
Night w (
talk)
07:44, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
- Draft for 1990s here. Night w ( talk) 15:59, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
- Draft for 1980s here. Night w ( talk) 00:25, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
- Draft for 1970s here. Night w ( talk) 16:25, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
- Draft for 1960s here. Night w ( talk) 08:24, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
- Draft for 1950s here. Night w ( talk) 14:21, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
- If there's a period (like during the World Wars) that requires greater division, then we can stick to years in those cases, but I'm certainly game to try and see how if it works. I think 2000-2009 certainly does. The draft is
here. No major differences in the first category. The second is good too, but I still have to add the commentaries that were on the 07-09 pages. The last category is a little more pedantic with the terminology changes, but I'm going to clean that up. Most of the information was cut and paste, so I can't guarantee the facts displayed—but I'm hoping the broader time coverage will be able to get greater traffic flow from editors.
Night w (
talk)
07:44, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
Merges completed. Night w ( talk) 03:32, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
- It isn't working very well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.55.212.221 ( talk) 18:18, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of sovereign states in 2000. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151203000000/http://www.orderofmalta.int/diplomatic-relations/862/sovereign-order-of-malta-bilateral-relations/?lang=en to http://www.orderofmalta.int/diplomatic-relations/862/sovereign-order-of-malta-bilateral-relations/?lang=en
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:08, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 00:37, 23 September 2019 (UTC)