This article was nominated for deletion on 10 August 2023. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
Colemanballs has enough supporting information to merit its own article, but these three articles are just single-paragraph explanations with a lot of (fairly arbitrarily chosen) examples - they're funny, but they don't add anything to the article. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, and I think these would all be better off merged with the list article here. What do other editors think? -- McGeddon 13:47, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
I agree with merging Luvvies and Dumb Britain, but I do think that there exists an awareness of Pseud's Corner outside of the hardcore Eye readership, which might make it noteworthy enough to deserve its own page. Whatever anyone does though, those lists of quotes have to go. They're just to long and pointless. Sceptic-all 15:07, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion on 10 August 2023. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
Colemanballs has enough supporting information to merit its own article, but these three articles are just single-paragraph explanations with a lot of (fairly arbitrarily chosen) examples - they're funny, but they don't add anything to the article. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, and I think these would all be better off merged with the list article here. What do other editors think? -- McGeddon 13:47, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
I agree with merging Luvvies and Dumb Britain, but I do think that there exists an awareness of Pseud's Corner outside of the hardcore Eye readership, which might make it noteworthy enough to deserve its own page. Whatever anyone does though, those lists of quotes have to go. They're just to long and pointless. Sceptic-all 15:07, 13 September 2007 (UTC)