This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Lists Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Government Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance). U.S. Congress Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is about one (or many) people(s). Politics: American Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance). Biography: Politics and Government This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

The contents of the Presidents pro tempore of the United States Senate, 1911–1913 page were merged into List of presidents pro tempore of the United States Senate on 10 November 2012. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

Why was John Langdon's PPT term broken up during the 1st Congress? -- Markles 02:25, 7 November 2005 (UTC) reply

What's the basis for this? Many other people have continued as senators after serving as President pro tempore. (Including the ones we mention - Byrd was emeritus from 1995 to 2001, and Thurmond from 1987 to 1995, and again from 2001 to 2003.) The same goes for Styles Bridges (1955-1961), Arthur Vandenberg (1949-1951), and Kenneth McKellar (1947-1949), just in the post-WWII era.

Is this a formal title? If so, a citation would be in order. john k ( talk) 18:35, 10 April 2008 (UTC) reply

I feel it would be useful if the time they were senator was added, next to the time as pro tempore. Thoughts? PrairieKid ( talk) 05:24, 10 February 2013 (UTC) reply

Images should be added to the table. MB298 ( talk) 04:19, 12 February 2016 (UTC) reply

In the Emeritus section ... (which is peculiar, and maybe redundant) someone wrote that no one was eligible to be President Pro Tempore from 2009-2015.

This is false. Citation: the full list of Presidents Pro-Tempore on this page.

& The Senate website just says tradition is to choose the most senior member of the majority party of the Senate.

I suspect the error may have been vandalism, as the information is not hard to find and those terms correlate with the Obama Administration. Dtibsyh ( talk) 04:52, 14 May 2023 (UTC) reply

Should “pro administration” be changed to federalist? Ayunipear ( talk) 14:44, 6 May 2024 (UTC) reply

No, because there were no organized political parties prior to the 4th Congress. Drdpw ( talk) 15:35, 6 May 2024 (UTC) reply