![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Per discussions on the List of pumped-storage hydroelectric power stations page, I added pumped-storage hydropower stations in China to this list. I added a "PS" to the end of each name and made a note at the bottom to indicate they are pumped-storage. I will be moving the rest of the PS stations that meet to criteria to regional pages in the coming week. Since this is part of a larger effort and Wiki, let me know if you like the formatting.-- NortyNort ( talk) 05:03, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
From what I see, Generalhuo ( talk · contribs) should not have reverted the 366849271 edit made by NortyNort ( talk · contribs), until a firm conclusion is reached in the above discussion. Aside that, I think it is wrong for Generalhuo to comment "Let's not be double standard. Look all other nations articles. Most of entries have no references either. Why just be picky on articles about China". It may be true that other articles are not in standard, or by the MOS, but we as editors, should make sure that it is in standard even if it means editing the first article out of a million more; this encyclopaedia is after all, functioning on that principle.
I also do agree that the newer version (compared to the old) by Generalhuo did do some considerable damage to the article. For example (keeping the referencing aside), many links in the new version are broken (improperly linked).
On the last comment above (by NortyNort), I strongly agree that "Power stations below 1000 MW were specifically taken off the big lists and put on these countries pages", as I myself was involved in that process. Regional lists, like this article, seems to be the most accessible place to list such power stations. Thus removal of these entries, without proper reason, may simply considered vandalism.
I will, for the above reasons, revert again, and will have to ask both to stop any further reverts. Please consider discussing (with proper consensus) before making any further edits which may be considered controversial. I hope this helps. Kind regards to both. Rehman( +) 10:11, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
I think there should be totals at the bottom of the columns reflecting operational, proposed, and under construction capacities. 174.30.44.30 ( talk) 10:14, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
I started a discussion back in February
here but it didn't have any input. These two articles have very similar names and should be merged. There is no sense in having a list of major power stations and a list of power stations. All of the separate lists in the major power station article can be placed at the bottom of this article or better yet, at the bottom in a nav box. These lists are a great contribution to the encyclopedia but I want to reduce redundancy.--
NortyNort
(Holla) 02:45, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
I started a nav box below:--
NortyNort
(Holla) 05:53, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
Lots of coal fired stations missing. The list is probably about 10% of the units!!
I've added:
Daya Bay Units 1 & 2 Nuclear
Ling Ao Phase 1 Units 1&2 Nuclear
Ling Ao Phase 2 Units 1&2 nuclear
159.245.16.100 ( talk) 16:30, 20 April 2012 (UTC) Martin
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Per discussions on the List of pumped-storage hydroelectric power stations page, I added pumped-storage hydropower stations in China to this list. I added a "PS" to the end of each name and made a note at the bottom to indicate they are pumped-storage. I will be moving the rest of the PS stations that meet to criteria to regional pages in the coming week. Since this is part of a larger effort and Wiki, let me know if you like the formatting.-- NortyNort ( talk) 05:03, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
From what I see, Generalhuo ( talk · contribs) should not have reverted the 366849271 edit made by NortyNort ( talk · contribs), until a firm conclusion is reached in the above discussion. Aside that, I think it is wrong for Generalhuo to comment "Let's not be double standard. Look all other nations articles. Most of entries have no references either. Why just be picky on articles about China". It may be true that other articles are not in standard, or by the MOS, but we as editors, should make sure that it is in standard even if it means editing the first article out of a million more; this encyclopaedia is after all, functioning on that principle.
I also do agree that the newer version (compared to the old) by Generalhuo did do some considerable damage to the article. For example (keeping the referencing aside), many links in the new version are broken (improperly linked).
On the last comment above (by NortyNort), I strongly agree that "Power stations below 1000 MW were specifically taken off the big lists and put on these countries pages", as I myself was involved in that process. Regional lists, like this article, seems to be the most accessible place to list such power stations. Thus removal of these entries, without proper reason, may simply considered vandalism.
I will, for the above reasons, revert again, and will have to ask both to stop any further reverts. Please consider discussing (with proper consensus) before making any further edits which may be considered controversial. I hope this helps. Kind regards to both. Rehman( +) 10:11, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
I think there should be totals at the bottom of the columns reflecting operational, proposed, and under construction capacities. 174.30.44.30 ( talk) 10:14, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
I started a discussion back in February
here but it didn't have any input. These two articles have very similar names and should be merged. There is no sense in having a list of major power stations and a list of power stations. All of the separate lists in the major power station article can be placed at the bottom of this article or better yet, at the bottom in a nav box. These lists are a great contribution to the encyclopedia but I want to reduce redundancy.--
NortyNort
(Holla) 02:45, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
I started a nav box below:--
NortyNort
(Holla) 05:53, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
Lots of coal fired stations missing. The list is probably about 10% of the units!!
I've added:
Daya Bay Units 1 & 2 Nuclear
Ling Ao Phase 1 Units 1&2 Nuclear
Ling Ao Phase 2 Units 1&2 nuclear
159.245.16.100 ( talk) 16:30, 20 April 2012 (UTC) Martin