![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 4 February 2016. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
for easy of reference wouldn't this be a better layout?
Cézanne, Paul, (1839-1906), French artist
Singularity 20:34, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
---
Isn't this person entirely fictional? See Bluebeard (book); as far as I know there is no real historical person.
Perhaps the list under "Maine Painting" should go on a sepperate page?
Done, to List of Maine Painters. -- Infrogmation
---
Isn't it time this page broken up into separate pages by letter? BevRowe 17:44 Apr 3, 2003 (UTC)
Does anyone think that L. S. Lowry is famous enough to be put in the popular artists section of this article, as he is very famous in Britain. Or has no-one outside Britain ever heard of him? G-Man 30th apr 2003
I've given it a week and no-ones objected so I'll take that as a yes G-Man 6th may 03
I think it's rather superfluous to note that an individual on the list is a "painter". Clearly, they wouldn't belong on the list if they weren't. -- Infrogmation 17:41 25 Jul 2003 (UTC)
I do not think that Mikhail Lermontov belongs to the list. He was a great poet but quite a mediocre painter, maybe we should exclude him?
The list is indeed completely chaotic. Some examples:
Conclusion: this list requires a thorough cleanup.
Addendum: Painters needs it's own subcategory in a new subcategory "Artists" in "Culture - Art"
Proposal: complete overhaul of the article (and several others), a few possibilities:
As for the name question: seeing as any webpage can be searched, it doesn't seem me as necessary to deviate from the standard "Name-Surname" form and place the surname first. Besides, most painters have their own seperate article.
Please comment or leave a message on my talk page.
Hraban 14:05, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
Cleanup fase I now complete:
Cleanup fase II can now begin:
This leaves the case of determining "who should be on the list".
Proposal:
be on the lists.
Criteria I propose:
Or, simpler:
Advice on the criteria would be more than welcome.
Hraban 12:35, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
I have going through the list and nominating linked articles for deletion. I don't know if that is appropriate or not. There must be guidelines for inclusion on this list, or the millions of people who adequately and deftly weild paintbrushes will need entries. I suggest the guidlines for inclusion be: 1. A history of critical response in recognized journals and periodicals. 2.A consistent exhibition record in public galleries or records of participation with public galleries and foundations. 3. Evidence of a significant contribution to the discipline of painting in other capacities. I have done a cursory perusal of the list, and there are many that need to be deleted for the above reasons. -- Thamiel 17:15 6 Nov 2006
16-April-2007: I estimate the list has only about 1,800 painters, so more could be added. Many notable painters are not yet in English Wikipedia, but those painters appear in foreign WPs. - Wikid77 13:18, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
16-April-2007: I estimate the list has about 1,850 painters, so removing painters is not a priority yet (start pruning after 3,000? painters). This month, I have added dozens of notable painters who have WP articles or German-WP articles but were not on the list. Pre-judging notability is difficult (such as the painter of the recently purported painting of Jane Austen), so judge not too quickly. As of April 2007, I believe that WP art-articles are in their infancy, so keep adding everywhere. - Wikid77 13:19, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
This list has far too many non-notable, self promoting, red links. Can they be deleted? Teapotgeorge 10:11, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
The entry "Wolfgang Siemens" was deleted twice. What about "This list is incomplete; you can help by expanding it."? What about the other "red links"? You Can find an articel about the painter on German-WK: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolfgang_Siemens (I am not: Wolfgang Siemens himself, not a friend or his agent.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 145.254.134.239 ( talk) 18:10, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
I've restored the red ink primarily because several are well known artists and while there are no articles yet they are in many instances deserving and/or notable. I'v observed other lists in other languages with well known American artists in red ink awaiting translation into German, Italian, Spanish, and French etc... Modernist ( talk) 22:57, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
According to a series of edits like https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=List_of_painters_by_name_beginning_with_%22A%22&oldid=958377518 by @ Bmcln1:, it was suggested that the lists by letter each follow U.S. spelling conventions. Is there a particular reason for this? Wouldn't "English-language" spelling conventions be more appropriate, to avoid WP:ENGVAR questions? TheFeds 01:24, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
Most pages can be one or the other, but shouldn't be both. Subsequently changing from one to the other is discouraged. Bmcln1 ( talk) 16:28, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 4 February 2016. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
for easy of reference wouldn't this be a better layout?
Cézanne, Paul, (1839-1906), French artist
Singularity 20:34, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
---
Isn't this person entirely fictional? See Bluebeard (book); as far as I know there is no real historical person.
Perhaps the list under "Maine Painting" should go on a sepperate page?
Done, to List of Maine Painters. -- Infrogmation
---
Isn't it time this page broken up into separate pages by letter? BevRowe 17:44 Apr 3, 2003 (UTC)
Does anyone think that L. S. Lowry is famous enough to be put in the popular artists section of this article, as he is very famous in Britain. Or has no-one outside Britain ever heard of him? G-Man 30th apr 2003
I've given it a week and no-ones objected so I'll take that as a yes G-Man 6th may 03
I think it's rather superfluous to note that an individual on the list is a "painter". Clearly, they wouldn't belong on the list if they weren't. -- Infrogmation 17:41 25 Jul 2003 (UTC)
I do not think that Mikhail Lermontov belongs to the list. He was a great poet but quite a mediocre painter, maybe we should exclude him?
The list is indeed completely chaotic. Some examples:
Conclusion: this list requires a thorough cleanup.
Addendum: Painters needs it's own subcategory in a new subcategory "Artists" in "Culture - Art"
Proposal: complete overhaul of the article (and several others), a few possibilities:
As for the name question: seeing as any webpage can be searched, it doesn't seem me as necessary to deviate from the standard "Name-Surname" form and place the surname first. Besides, most painters have their own seperate article.
Please comment or leave a message on my talk page.
Hraban 14:05, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
Cleanup fase I now complete:
Cleanup fase II can now begin:
This leaves the case of determining "who should be on the list".
Proposal:
be on the lists.
Criteria I propose:
Or, simpler:
Advice on the criteria would be more than welcome.
Hraban 12:35, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
I have going through the list and nominating linked articles for deletion. I don't know if that is appropriate or not. There must be guidelines for inclusion on this list, or the millions of people who adequately and deftly weild paintbrushes will need entries. I suggest the guidlines for inclusion be: 1. A history of critical response in recognized journals and periodicals. 2.A consistent exhibition record in public galleries or records of participation with public galleries and foundations. 3. Evidence of a significant contribution to the discipline of painting in other capacities. I have done a cursory perusal of the list, and there are many that need to be deleted for the above reasons. -- Thamiel 17:15 6 Nov 2006
16-April-2007: I estimate the list has only about 1,800 painters, so more could be added. Many notable painters are not yet in English Wikipedia, but those painters appear in foreign WPs. - Wikid77 13:18, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
16-April-2007: I estimate the list has about 1,850 painters, so removing painters is not a priority yet (start pruning after 3,000? painters). This month, I have added dozens of notable painters who have WP articles or German-WP articles but were not on the list. Pre-judging notability is difficult (such as the painter of the recently purported painting of Jane Austen), so judge not too quickly. As of April 2007, I believe that WP art-articles are in their infancy, so keep adding everywhere. - Wikid77 13:19, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
This list has far too many non-notable, self promoting, red links. Can they be deleted? Teapotgeorge 10:11, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
The entry "Wolfgang Siemens" was deleted twice. What about "This list is incomplete; you can help by expanding it."? What about the other "red links"? You Can find an articel about the painter on German-WK: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolfgang_Siemens (I am not: Wolfgang Siemens himself, not a friend or his agent.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 145.254.134.239 ( talk) 18:10, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
I've restored the red ink primarily because several are well known artists and while there are no articles yet they are in many instances deserving and/or notable. I'v observed other lists in other languages with well known American artists in red ink awaiting translation into German, Italian, Spanish, and French etc... Modernist ( talk) 22:57, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
According to a series of edits like https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=List_of_painters_by_name_beginning_with_%22A%22&oldid=958377518 by @ Bmcln1:, it was suggested that the lists by letter each follow U.S. spelling conventions. Is there a particular reason for this? Wouldn't "English-language" spelling conventions be more appropriate, to avoid WP:ENGVAR questions? TheFeds 01:24, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
Most pages can be one or the other, but shouldn't be both. Subsequently changing from one to the other is discouraged. Bmcln1 ( talk) 16:28, 27 December 2020 (UTC)