This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
List of offshore wind farms in the United States. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 07:32, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on
List of offshore wind farms in the United States. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 18:41, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.73.186.139 ( talk) 16:14, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
This article has grown about large enough to be split, into List of offshore wind farms in the United States and Offshore wind power in the United States. Not sure where to put the Projects list. TGCP ( talk) 21:28, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
This article is hard to understand without any visual references, so I added a map showing the current Massachusetts/Rhode Island projects (of which one is operational, two are under construction, one is in permitting, and three more are in design and exploration phases. I also added some references that make it clearer why this location was the first to be commercially developed at large scale. I did not go into detail about why this location is favorable from a grid injection standpoint (that would take an essay, and more digging up of references than I care to do tonight), but the ultimate explanation is that the retirement of Pilgrim and Brayton Point power stations have left the SEMA/RI region import-constrained, but have also left the region with significant export capacity. (The two New York-focused projects in this area will deliver power to Long Island, which is also import-constrained.) The recent ISO New England study of grid needs to support the renewable energy transition found that existing transmission infrastructure in southern New England can support injection of up to 8 GW, although the high end of that range may require uneconomically long transmission lines; additional offshore or onshore wind development is a matter for further study. 121a0012 ( talk) 03:19, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
I'd like to propose removing some of the duplicative or uninformative columns from the tables. The regulatory authority is the same for all of the projects (it's BOEM) and shouldn't be confused with the state energy regulator or the state agency responsible for managing PPA solicitations. The long-winded descriptions of the locations were written by the proponents to market them to state energy regulators, and thus describe projects in the same location as being X many nautical miles offshore Y state for different X and Y. The coordinates and BOEM lease number should be sufficient and would reduce the amount of scrolling required to read the table. 121a0012 ( talk) 03:04, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
List of offshore wind farms in the United States. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 07:32, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on
List of offshore wind farms in the United States. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 18:41, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.73.186.139 ( talk) 16:14, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
This article has grown about large enough to be split, into List of offshore wind farms in the United States and Offshore wind power in the United States. Not sure where to put the Projects list. TGCP ( talk) 21:28, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
This article is hard to understand without any visual references, so I added a map showing the current Massachusetts/Rhode Island projects (of which one is operational, two are under construction, one is in permitting, and three more are in design and exploration phases. I also added some references that make it clearer why this location was the first to be commercially developed at large scale. I did not go into detail about why this location is favorable from a grid injection standpoint (that would take an essay, and more digging up of references than I care to do tonight), but the ultimate explanation is that the retirement of Pilgrim and Brayton Point power stations have left the SEMA/RI region import-constrained, but have also left the region with significant export capacity. (The two New York-focused projects in this area will deliver power to Long Island, which is also import-constrained.) The recent ISO New England study of grid needs to support the renewable energy transition found that existing transmission infrastructure in southern New England can support injection of up to 8 GW, although the high end of that range may require uneconomically long transmission lines; additional offshore or onshore wind development is a matter for further study. 121a0012 ( talk) 03:19, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
I'd like to propose removing some of the duplicative or uninformative columns from the tables. The regulatory authority is the same for all of the projects (it's BOEM) and shouldn't be confused with the state energy regulator or the state agency responsible for managing PPA solicitations. The long-winded descriptions of the locations were written by the proponents to market them to state energy regulators, and thus describe projects in the same location as being X many nautical miles offshore Y state for different X and Y. The coordinates and BOEM lease number should be sufficient and would reduce the amount of scrolling required to read the table. 121a0012 ( talk) 03:04, 20 January 2023 (UTC)