This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The column on "Website" should not be the main purpose of a column in the table for sources. The main need, per WP:V and WP:RS, is for a verifiable, reliable secondary source, for any and all claims made in Wikipedia. Sometimes, a primary source, such as the website of the company or government entity building a wind farm, is the best we have, at least temporarily. But I do think that "website" should not be the point of the column; a verifiable source should be. If we are to make the assertions made in this list, we want to find better sources than mere company websites, whether those sources are accessble via the internet (always preferable, per WP:V) or not. Cheers. N2e ( talk) 17:27, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
There's another offshore wind farm at Blyth (the Blyth Offshore Demonstrator Project), built in 2017: Source: [1], [2] — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheJoff ( talk • contribs) 09:49, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Should this be added?
This paper lists recent load factors on page 5-7. Seems to be similar to capacity factor, but I'm not sure. . Source: Tools and Other Data: Draft Annual Load Factors 2014-15 TGCP ( talk) 20:31, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on List of offshore wind farms in the United Kingdom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:14, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
Dogger Bank is now operational, and generating power for the nation grid, though will continue to be constructed until 2026. Should it be moved to the operational table?
https://www.itv.com/news/tyne-tees/2023-10-10/worlds-largest-wind-farm-starts-producing-electricity Foxdown ( talk) 13:55, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
Billed as "The first commercial-scale floating offshore windfarm in Europe" this should probably be on this page, but not sure where. It apparently has planning consent for both onshore and offshore works, not sure about grid connection... https://greenvoltoffshorewind.com/greenvoltoffshoreconsent/. There may be other INTOG projects missing too see https://www.crownestatescotland.com/news/intog-13-projects-selected-to-support-green-innovation-and-help-decarbonise-north-sea, but not familiar with status of these. Drnoble ( talk) 18:43, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The column on "Website" should not be the main purpose of a column in the table for sources. The main need, per WP:V and WP:RS, is for a verifiable, reliable secondary source, for any and all claims made in Wikipedia. Sometimes, a primary source, such as the website of the company or government entity building a wind farm, is the best we have, at least temporarily. But I do think that "website" should not be the point of the column; a verifiable source should be. If we are to make the assertions made in this list, we want to find better sources than mere company websites, whether those sources are accessble via the internet (always preferable, per WP:V) or not. Cheers. N2e ( talk) 17:27, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
There's another offshore wind farm at Blyth (the Blyth Offshore Demonstrator Project), built in 2017: Source: [1], [2] — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheJoff ( talk • contribs) 09:49, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Should this be added?
This paper lists recent load factors on page 5-7. Seems to be similar to capacity factor, but I'm not sure. . Source: Tools and Other Data: Draft Annual Load Factors 2014-15 TGCP ( talk) 20:31, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on List of offshore wind farms in the United Kingdom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:14, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
Dogger Bank is now operational, and generating power for the nation grid, though will continue to be constructed until 2026. Should it be moved to the operational table?
https://www.itv.com/news/tyne-tees/2023-10-10/worlds-largest-wind-farm-starts-producing-electricity Foxdown ( talk) 13:55, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
Billed as "The first commercial-scale floating offshore windfarm in Europe" this should probably be on this page, but not sure where. It apparently has planning consent for both onshore and offshore works, not sure about grid connection... https://greenvoltoffshorewind.com/greenvoltoffshoreconsent/. There may be other INTOG projects missing too see https://www.crownestatescotland.com/news/intog-13-projects-selected-to-support-green-innovation-and-help-decarbonise-north-sea, but not familiar with status of these. Drnoble ( talk) 18:43, 4 July 2024 (UTC)