![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from this version of List of number-one singles in 2008 (New Zealand) was copied or moved into List of number-one singles from the 2000s (New Zealand) with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Are the album Photos necessary because i find they take up to much space and are just really annoying anyway please comment on why/why not this should be kept/not kept. Glamgirljaspreet101 ( talk) 05:39, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Which table format would the article be better of with?. The one currently being used in the article, or the table which User:Laydan Mortensen has created to be used in the article? JayJ47 ( talk) 05:07, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
I believe the newer version is easier to read now I have made some changes. The only change I am planning to make is to merge together multiple cells, and emphasise New Zealand Songs in the charts. At the moment it looks messy with consecutive cells containing the same data.
If we agree, the first few rows of the table will look like this:-
Week | Artist | Title | Album |
---|---|---|---|
6 January | Leona Lewis | " Bleeding Love" | Spirit |
14 January | |||
21 January | |||
28 January |
Flo Rida featuring T-Pain |
" Low" | Mail on Sunday |
4 February | |||
11 February | |||
18 February | Chris Brown | " With You" | Exclusive |
Leave any messages for me on my talk page please.
Thanks, Laydan Mortensen ( talk) 07:11, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
Or how about we use this format instead as shown below:
Week | Artist | Title | Album | |
January 6 | Leona Lewis | Bleeding Love | Spirit | |
January 14 | Leona Lewis | Bleeding Love | Spirit | |
January 21 | Leona Lewis | Bleeding Love | Spirit |
and so on. What do you guys think????? JayJ47 ( talk) 09:55, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
Week beginning | Artist | Title | Album |
---|---|---|---|
January 6 | Leona Lewis | Bleeding Love | Spirit |
January 14 | Leona Lewis | Bleeding Love | Spirit |
January 21 | Leona Lewis | Bleeding Love | Spirit |
28 January | Flo Rida featuring T-Pain | Low | Mail on Sunday |
Laydan Mortensen ( talk) 22:02, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
Hmmm...... I think the album is a bit too close to the song. However I do agree with you, on the table i suggested. The columns are too far apart but i'm not sure how to fix this. How about you try and fix it? JayJ47 ( talk) 06:47, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
So what do you guys think we should do?. I think its best that we choose one of the tables you guys have suggested. Both look fine to me, but i'd like us all to come to the same conclusion. SJPH ( talk) 06:51, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from this version of List of number-one singles in 2008 (New Zealand) was copied or moved into List of number-one singles from the 2000s (New Zealand) with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Are the album Photos necessary because i find they take up to much space and are just really annoying anyway please comment on why/why not this should be kept/not kept. Glamgirljaspreet101 ( talk) 05:39, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Which table format would the article be better of with?. The one currently being used in the article, or the table which User:Laydan Mortensen has created to be used in the article? JayJ47 ( talk) 05:07, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
I believe the newer version is easier to read now I have made some changes. The only change I am planning to make is to merge together multiple cells, and emphasise New Zealand Songs in the charts. At the moment it looks messy with consecutive cells containing the same data.
If we agree, the first few rows of the table will look like this:-
Week | Artist | Title | Album |
---|---|---|---|
6 January | Leona Lewis | " Bleeding Love" | Spirit |
14 January | |||
21 January | |||
28 January |
Flo Rida featuring T-Pain |
" Low" | Mail on Sunday |
4 February | |||
11 February | |||
18 February | Chris Brown | " With You" | Exclusive |
Leave any messages for me on my talk page please.
Thanks, Laydan Mortensen ( talk) 07:11, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
Or how about we use this format instead as shown below:
Week | Artist | Title | Album | |
January 6 | Leona Lewis | Bleeding Love | Spirit | |
January 14 | Leona Lewis | Bleeding Love | Spirit | |
January 21 | Leona Lewis | Bleeding Love | Spirit |
and so on. What do you guys think????? JayJ47 ( talk) 09:55, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
Week beginning | Artist | Title | Album |
---|---|---|---|
January 6 | Leona Lewis | Bleeding Love | Spirit |
January 14 | Leona Lewis | Bleeding Love | Spirit |
January 21 | Leona Lewis | Bleeding Love | Spirit |
28 January | Flo Rida featuring T-Pain | Low | Mail on Sunday |
Laydan Mortensen ( talk) 22:02, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
Hmmm...... I think the album is a bit too close to the song. However I do agree with you, on the table i suggested. The columns are too far apart but i'm not sure how to fix this. How about you try and fix it? JayJ47 ( talk) 06:47, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
So what do you guys think we should do?. I think its best that we choose one of the tables you guys have suggested. Both look fine to me, but i'd like us all to come to the same conclusion. SJPH ( talk) 06:51, 20 June 2008 (UTC)