![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The lead says that this is a "list of acronyms listed in scholarly books and articles" but only one of the terms cites such a book or article, and that gives a bare ISBN with no page reference, making it a cite of limited value.
I have removed several terms that were not even defined at the linked pages, which were in those cases dab pages. But if references to at lest prove the use of these acronyms are not provided soon, I will nominate this for deletion. Moreover, so many acronyms are used in marketing that I suspect this list is unmaintainable (inherently incomplete) anyway, so I would still be inclined to suggest deletion. DES (talk) 06:30, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
What is the point of this page when authors can simply categorize their entries with Category:Marketing terminology ? Mark R. Attisha ( talk) 23:10, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
I agree with the previous comment. This page is entirely pointless.
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The lead says that this is a "list of acronyms listed in scholarly books and articles" but only one of the terms cites such a book or article, and that gives a bare ISBN with no page reference, making it a cite of limited value.
I have removed several terms that were not even defined at the linked pages, which were in those cases dab pages. But if references to at lest prove the use of these acronyms are not provided soon, I will nominate this for deletion. Moreover, so many acronyms are used in marketing that I suspect this list is unmaintainable (inherently incomplete) anyway, so I would still be inclined to suggest deletion. DES (talk) 06:30, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
What is the point of this page when authors can simply categorize their entries with Category:Marketing terminology ? Mark R. Attisha ( talk) 23:10, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
I agree with the previous comment. This page is entirely pointless.