This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
List of individual bears article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 4 February 2008. The result of the discussion was Keep. |
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Can someone who knows better clear up a point under sectn, The Great Bear of Burtonport – which part is tongue-in-cheek/real etc because it's not referenced and needs to be encyclopedic in tone. Don't know enough about it to sort out the irony. Thanks, Julia Rossi ( talk) 07:48, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Amusingly, this article was created far before 2006, but deleted and some of that information put into categories. You won't find this in the history of this article, because it's 'new'. I guess all good things come back around :)
~ender 2008-12-20 11:20:AM MST —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
4.240.27.73 (
talk)
Should this "list" be sorted alphabetically or chronologically? It really should be one or the other, I think. Right now there doesn't seem to be any particular order to it. - dcljr ( talk) 22:48, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
I can't believe he wasn't mentioned. (Yes, he really did exist. LOL) Raphael ( talk) 19:24, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: page moved per unanimous consensus here. Beeblebrox ( talk) 00:52, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
List of non-fictional bears → List of individual bears – This is an article title only Wikipedia would produce. I think it is enough that we have a hatnonte pointing to List of fictional bears instead of making that distinction right in the article title. It seems to me that just "list of bears" is sufficient. Thoughts? Beeblebrox ( talk) 23:14, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
I was dissatisfied with the page as it was, so I made some rather large changes
I apologize for the unbearable pun. The list still needs a deal of work, if anyone is feeling inspired. Piboy51 ( talk) 23:52, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on List of individual bears. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:39, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of individual bears. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:06, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
List of individual bears article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 4 February 2008. The result of the discussion was Keep. |
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Can someone who knows better clear up a point under sectn, The Great Bear of Burtonport – which part is tongue-in-cheek/real etc because it's not referenced and needs to be encyclopedic in tone. Don't know enough about it to sort out the irony. Thanks, Julia Rossi ( talk) 07:48, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Amusingly, this article was created far before 2006, but deleted and some of that information put into categories. You won't find this in the history of this article, because it's 'new'. I guess all good things come back around :)
~ender 2008-12-20 11:20:AM MST —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
4.240.27.73 (
talk)
Should this "list" be sorted alphabetically or chronologically? It really should be one or the other, I think. Right now there doesn't seem to be any particular order to it. - dcljr ( talk) 22:48, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
I can't believe he wasn't mentioned. (Yes, he really did exist. LOL) Raphael ( talk) 19:24, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: page moved per unanimous consensus here. Beeblebrox ( talk) 00:52, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
List of non-fictional bears → List of individual bears – This is an article title only Wikipedia would produce. I think it is enough that we have a hatnonte pointing to List of fictional bears instead of making that distinction right in the article title. It seems to me that just "list of bears" is sufficient. Thoughts? Beeblebrox ( talk) 23:14, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
I was dissatisfied with the page as it was, so I made some rather large changes
I apologize for the unbearable pun. The list still needs a deal of work, if anyone is feeling inspired. Piboy51 ( talk) 23:52, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on List of individual bears. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:39, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of individual bears. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:06, 30 December 2017 (UTC)