![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
May I suggest adding the tracks of storms or adding some more pics? The article in its current state looks very dull. Also I would suggest changing the title to List of Canadian Hurricanes, as that's a lot more gramatically correct. "Nova Scotia's biggest train person" ( talk) 15:33, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Another one added to the "List of" series. How's it look? →Cycl one1→ 19:23, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
"Ontario"
Ontario has experienced the remnants of several tropical cyclones that struck the United States, with the most notable storm being Hurricane Hazel in 1954. Hazel dropped heavy rainfall in Toronto, killing 35 people.
And that's it. Then, the List of Ontario hurricanes article would have every last tropical cyclone to effect the area. The NJ format would work well that way. It would be a lot of work, but I'm sure you can get help if you need it. For provinces like Alberta and Manitoba, you could say,
"Alberta" No tropical cyclone has effected the province.
That might get a little redundant, but it's a good way to keep things organized for now. Hurricanehink ( talk) 01:26, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
Nova Scotia
Main article: List of Nova Scotia hurricanes
(enter Nova Scotia storms here from 1851 - present day)
Lol, thanks. Oddly enough, I've had paper cuts half this size that have hurt much longer. The pain has nearly stopped. Anyway, back on subject. I like that idea, but we should discuss it a little more first. Do you mean putting the most notable storm ever of the province in this article and making a sub-article for the province, or several of the more notable storms of the province in this article, and making a sub-article for the province? →Cycl one1→ 04:06, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
I'll add: Link the first instance of the provinces and place only, not randm occurences withi the article. Circeus 01:20, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
This is the plan. This article will serve as a pseudo-disambiguation page. There will be sections for each province's tropical cyclone history, and those that have over 10 will have their own sub-article. For those that have their own sub-article, only the most notable storm will be mentioned in that section. If one storm is the most notable for more than one section, then pick the second most notable for the province with the lesser impact. This article will have general climatology in the beginning. Then, it goes by provinces with TC impacts. The sub-articles will be
List of Ontario hurricanes,
List of Quebec hurricanes,
List of New Brunswick hurricanes,
List of Nova Scotia hurricanes,
List of Prince Edward Island hurricanes, and
List of Newfoundland and Labrador hurricanes. I think that extratropical storms should not be counted unless they caused actual damage. There's no need to mention every extratropical storm that moved through Canada if you don't have any information on it. So, does this sound good to everyone? --
Hurricanehink (
talk)
17:50, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
Hmmmm, I don't think it should be split up. It sort of sounds like a waste of time. Instead, I think this article could become the focus of it all. A lot more reseach is needed, though, to ensure if is comprehensive enough. Off the top of my head, Katrina and Isabel both affected Canada. Hurricanehink ( talk) 18:40, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Just a quick thought after 10 months - I personally think that the article should be divided into tropical cyclones impacting Canada, with another section of Deadly Post-Tropical Cyclones, post-tropical being a Canadian Hurricane Centre term for tropical cyclones that became extratropical. This would limit the non-tropical storms to those that were actually notable (notable storms usually cause deaths), and would include Hazel and the 1959 storm, as well as Isabel if you care to also include indirect deaths. It might require some more research, though, to ensure comprehensiveness. Hurricanehink ( talk) 02:14, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Should this be List of Canadian hurricanes or List of hurricanes in Canada instead of List of Canada hurricanes? The current title leaves much to be desired grammar-wise, IMHO. — Over My Head 16:27, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
The image Image:Hazel2.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 12:03, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
I wouldn't say 1900-1949 was a long lull - the august Gales of 1926-1927 were pretty much the worst of them all (category 3 direct hit in 1927)! cf: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1927_Nova_Scotia_Hurricane, also numerous accounts, museum displays, monuments etc.. along Nova Scotia's South Shore.
Didier Schvartz ( talk) 21:57, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on List of Canada hurricanes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:30, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of Canada hurricanes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:04, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Moved. I find consensus for the move. It's possible that the articles inside the entire subcategory may need to be moved or addressed. ( non-admin closure) Wikiexplorationandhelping ( talk) 19:16, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
List of Canada hurricanes →
List of hurricanes in Canada – It's very possible that as an American, I am missing something in Canadian English that would have this title formulation sound more natural, and if so please don't move this, but otherwise this title seems oddly worded to me. I was going to propose "List of Canadian hurricanes" but "List of hurricanes in X" seems to be the general logical naming convention and Candian hurricanes could imply the hurricanes originated in Canada.
Tartar
Torte
13:58, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
May I suggest adding the tracks of storms or adding some more pics? The article in its current state looks very dull. Also I would suggest changing the title to List of Canadian Hurricanes, as that's a lot more gramatically correct. "Nova Scotia's biggest train person" ( talk) 15:33, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Another one added to the "List of" series. How's it look? →Cycl one1→ 19:23, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
"Ontario"
Ontario has experienced the remnants of several tropical cyclones that struck the United States, with the most notable storm being Hurricane Hazel in 1954. Hazel dropped heavy rainfall in Toronto, killing 35 people.
And that's it. Then, the List of Ontario hurricanes article would have every last tropical cyclone to effect the area. The NJ format would work well that way. It would be a lot of work, but I'm sure you can get help if you need it. For provinces like Alberta and Manitoba, you could say,
"Alberta" No tropical cyclone has effected the province.
That might get a little redundant, but it's a good way to keep things organized for now. Hurricanehink ( talk) 01:26, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
Nova Scotia
Main article: List of Nova Scotia hurricanes
(enter Nova Scotia storms here from 1851 - present day)
Lol, thanks. Oddly enough, I've had paper cuts half this size that have hurt much longer. The pain has nearly stopped. Anyway, back on subject. I like that idea, but we should discuss it a little more first. Do you mean putting the most notable storm ever of the province in this article and making a sub-article for the province, or several of the more notable storms of the province in this article, and making a sub-article for the province? →Cycl one1→ 04:06, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
I'll add: Link the first instance of the provinces and place only, not randm occurences withi the article. Circeus 01:20, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
This is the plan. This article will serve as a pseudo-disambiguation page. There will be sections for each province's tropical cyclone history, and those that have over 10 will have their own sub-article. For those that have their own sub-article, only the most notable storm will be mentioned in that section. If one storm is the most notable for more than one section, then pick the second most notable for the province with the lesser impact. This article will have general climatology in the beginning. Then, it goes by provinces with TC impacts. The sub-articles will be
List of Ontario hurricanes,
List of Quebec hurricanes,
List of New Brunswick hurricanes,
List of Nova Scotia hurricanes,
List of Prince Edward Island hurricanes, and
List of Newfoundland and Labrador hurricanes. I think that extratropical storms should not be counted unless they caused actual damage. There's no need to mention every extratropical storm that moved through Canada if you don't have any information on it. So, does this sound good to everyone? --
Hurricanehink (
talk)
17:50, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
Hmmmm, I don't think it should be split up. It sort of sounds like a waste of time. Instead, I think this article could become the focus of it all. A lot more reseach is needed, though, to ensure if is comprehensive enough. Off the top of my head, Katrina and Isabel both affected Canada. Hurricanehink ( talk) 18:40, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Just a quick thought after 10 months - I personally think that the article should be divided into tropical cyclones impacting Canada, with another section of Deadly Post-Tropical Cyclones, post-tropical being a Canadian Hurricane Centre term for tropical cyclones that became extratropical. This would limit the non-tropical storms to those that were actually notable (notable storms usually cause deaths), and would include Hazel and the 1959 storm, as well as Isabel if you care to also include indirect deaths. It might require some more research, though, to ensure comprehensiveness. Hurricanehink ( talk) 02:14, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Should this be List of Canadian hurricanes or List of hurricanes in Canada instead of List of Canada hurricanes? The current title leaves much to be desired grammar-wise, IMHO. — Over My Head 16:27, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
The image Image:Hazel2.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 12:03, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
I wouldn't say 1900-1949 was a long lull - the august Gales of 1926-1927 were pretty much the worst of them all (category 3 direct hit in 1927)! cf: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1927_Nova_Scotia_Hurricane, also numerous accounts, museum displays, monuments etc.. along Nova Scotia's South Shore.
Didier Schvartz ( talk) 21:57, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on List of Canada hurricanes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:30, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of Canada hurricanes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:04, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Moved. I find consensus for the move. It's possible that the articles inside the entire subcategory may need to be moved or addressed. ( non-admin closure) Wikiexplorationandhelping ( talk) 19:16, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
List of Canada hurricanes →
List of hurricanes in Canada – It's very possible that as an American, I am missing something in Canadian English that would have this title formulation sound more natural, and if so please don't move this, but otherwise this title seems oddly worded to me. I was going to propose "List of Canadian hurricanes" but "List of hurricanes in X" seems to be the general logical naming convention and Candian hurricanes could imply the hurricanes originated in Canada.
Tartar
Torte
13:58, 6 October 2022 (UTC)