This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on List of aircraft of the Philippine Air Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:53, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
As before, may I again remind everyone especially FOX 52 that this source is inaccurate in its listing of aircraft in the Philippine Air Force. Among those noted are as follows: fleet numbers for AS-211, SF-260, OV-10, F-27, Nomad, Bell 412, UH-1, T-41, and the presence of H125 despite no orders for such helicopter. THis H125 has been appearing in their list for several years now and I remember mentioning this 2 years ago. As I said before, do not use FGs WAF too much especially when there are other sources confirming fleet numbers of other aircraft. This also applies to the Philippine Air Force. Phichanad ( talk) 07:35, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
Years after I pointed out that the numbers found on Flight International's annual World's Air Forces, not just for the Philippine Air Force but for several other air arms, is mostly incorrect. And a few editors are simply disregarding even any other acceptable sources. What's with the fixation on World's Air Forces? Are you an editor of Flight International? Many not just here but in other threads on air forces and air arms have provided reliable sources yet the same people simply take them out just to be in line with the data from World's Air Forces. What's with the monopoly on info? Phichanad ( talk) 12:30, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
As this article is subject to a bafflingly large number of unreferenced changes by IP and new editors, I've applied semi-protection. It defies belief that the PAF's inventory changes more frequently than that of air forces like the RAAF which are larger and have a major re-equipment process underway. Nick-D ( talk) 09:44, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
f5 35 units Bleu Tzy ( talk) 05:30, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. -- Hemantha ( talk) 06:38, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
I just added a tag because some user/s keep on reverting the edits made by me and others with their edits that contain some outdated, redundant, wrong, and sometimes improper information. RPC7778 ( talk) 16:34, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
I just noticed that "Current inventory" table of aircraft section on this page is duplication of List of active military aircraft of the Philippines#Air Force. The issue of duplication is if you want to update the content then you will need to update both pages (there is possibility that we update them differently and create may end up create different table of the exactly same subject) as per WP:REDUNDANTFORK.
My proposal are :
Note: Personally, I'd prefer the option 1, to remove current inventory table on this article and add link to List of active military aircraft of the Philippines#Air Force. Because that list include aircraft inventory of Philippine armed forces and most aircraft inventory reference using Flightglobal's World Air Forces, which also include aircraft belong to other armed forces branches. Ckfasdf ( talk) 16:47, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
@ Ckfasdf: Remove List of active military aircraft of the Philippines#Air Force, from the list will be the easy way to solve this issue - FOX 52 talk! 15:15, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on List of aircraft of the Philippine Air Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:53, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
As before, may I again remind everyone especially FOX 52 that this source is inaccurate in its listing of aircraft in the Philippine Air Force. Among those noted are as follows: fleet numbers for AS-211, SF-260, OV-10, F-27, Nomad, Bell 412, UH-1, T-41, and the presence of H125 despite no orders for such helicopter. THis H125 has been appearing in their list for several years now and I remember mentioning this 2 years ago. As I said before, do not use FGs WAF too much especially when there are other sources confirming fleet numbers of other aircraft. This also applies to the Philippine Air Force. Phichanad ( talk) 07:35, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
Years after I pointed out that the numbers found on Flight International's annual World's Air Forces, not just for the Philippine Air Force but for several other air arms, is mostly incorrect. And a few editors are simply disregarding even any other acceptable sources. What's with the fixation on World's Air Forces? Are you an editor of Flight International? Many not just here but in other threads on air forces and air arms have provided reliable sources yet the same people simply take them out just to be in line with the data from World's Air Forces. What's with the monopoly on info? Phichanad ( talk) 12:30, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
As this article is subject to a bafflingly large number of unreferenced changes by IP and new editors, I've applied semi-protection. It defies belief that the PAF's inventory changes more frequently than that of air forces like the RAAF which are larger and have a major re-equipment process underway. Nick-D ( talk) 09:44, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
f5 35 units Bleu Tzy ( talk) 05:30, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. -- Hemantha ( talk) 06:38, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
I just added a tag because some user/s keep on reverting the edits made by me and others with their edits that contain some outdated, redundant, wrong, and sometimes improper information. RPC7778 ( talk) 16:34, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
I just noticed that "Current inventory" table of aircraft section on this page is duplication of List of active military aircraft of the Philippines#Air Force. The issue of duplication is if you want to update the content then you will need to update both pages (there is possibility that we update them differently and create may end up create different table of the exactly same subject) as per WP:REDUNDANTFORK.
My proposal are :
Note: Personally, I'd prefer the option 1, to remove current inventory table on this article and add link to List of active military aircraft of the Philippines#Air Force. Because that list include aircraft inventory of Philippine armed forces and most aircraft inventory reference using Flightglobal's World Air Forces, which also include aircraft belong to other armed forces branches. Ckfasdf ( talk) 16:47, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
@ Ckfasdf: Remove List of active military aircraft of the Philippines#Air Force, from the list will be the easy way to solve this issue - FOX 52 talk! 15:15, 13 April 2022 (UTC)