This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
List of environmental journals article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 20 June 2008. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
There is an RfC regarding the standardization of journal lists names. Please comment at Talk:List of journals#RFC. Headbomb { talk / contribs / physics / books} 01:36, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
Q. Can the Journal of Interpretation Research be considered an "environmental journal"?
A. Yes. Here's the supporting evidence:
Based on the above, I believe the journal should be listed here. Thanks, DA Sonnenfeld ( talk) 10:45, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your comments, Randykitty -- helpful as usual! I concede that it would likely be a stretch to include JIR here if this list includes only journals with a primary focus on the environment. If that's the consensus, I'd suggest tweaking the intro to this article to make that clearer. Point taken on OR/interpretation, as well... Kind regards, DA Sonnenfeld ( talk) 14:17, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Kashmiri and Randykitty, have both made the valid point, though, that it is not clear from JIR's website, mission statement, etc. that environment (or even environmental interpretation) is a key focus of the journal. At some point it may be useful to revisit what should and shouldn't be included in this list-article. Kind regards, DA Sonnenfeld ( talk) 13:04, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
List of environmental journals article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 20 June 2008. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
There is an RfC regarding the standardization of journal lists names. Please comment at Talk:List of journals#RFC. Headbomb { talk / contribs / physics / books} 01:36, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
Q. Can the Journal of Interpretation Research be considered an "environmental journal"?
A. Yes. Here's the supporting evidence:
Based on the above, I believe the journal should be listed here. Thanks, DA Sonnenfeld ( talk) 10:45, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your comments, Randykitty -- helpful as usual! I concede that it would likely be a stretch to include JIR here if this list includes only journals with a primary focus on the environment. If that's the consensus, I'd suggest tweaking the intro to this article to make that clearer. Point taken on OR/interpretation, as well... Kind regards, DA Sonnenfeld ( talk) 14:17, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Kashmiri and Randykitty, have both made the valid point, though, that it is not clear from JIR's website, mission statement, etc. that environment (or even environmental interpretation) is a key focus of the journal. At some point it may be useful to revisit what should and shouldn't be included in this list-article. Kind regards, DA Sonnenfeld ( talk) 13:04, 20 May 2013 (UTC)